Comment by modeless

Comment by modeless a day ago

76 replies

I tried the reverse recently, charging my Model 3 at third party CCS chargers with adapter (and CCS compatibility retrofit). It is bleak out there. The chargers are few and far between, half of them are broken, and even the ones that aren't broken have compatibility issues so they may not work anyway. The required apps are unreliable and annoying.

I remember 5+ years ago Superchargers were a lot less common and also frequently broken. But those days are long gone. Tesla has really figured out reliability and maintenance, and there are plenty of stations for all but peak times. And the charging experience couldn't be simpler, park and plug in, unplug and go. No tap, no app. Crazy how no one else could figure this out.

epistasis a day ago

We had some visitors to California from out of state recently, and the rental car place gave them an electric car (not Tesla), without basically any education about how to deal with them.

I'm a huge fan of electric cars, and will probably never buy anything except EVs in the future, but man are you right that the non-Tesla experience is bleak.

Charging was incredibly stressful. Few CCS chargers, each with a tiny number of charging spots (4-8), with many chargers broken, and the rest fully occupied.

I know it will get better, but I can't believe how bad it is at the moment, and can't believe that car rental companies are handing EVs out without much much more handholding.

(Edit: plus, the car navigation system had zero knowledge of how to plan a long route with charging. That's table stakes for an EV, and criminally bad management that they'd ship a car that didn't have full knowledge of the chargers out there and also how to route. Traditional US car manufacturers are absolutely incompetent and will not survive competition with Chinese manufacturers unless they clean house on everything software related.)

  • jessriedel a day ago

    > Traditional US car manufacturers are absolutely incompetent and will not survive competition with Chinese manufacturers unless they clean house on everything software related.

    Legacy American car companies have been fully non-competitive with foreign brands for decades. Their continued existence is completely due to tariffs, and it’s not close. I see no reason to think congress would suddenly allow them to be threatened by Chinese companies.

    • nxm a day ago

      Tarrifs exist to protect higher wage jobs here in the US. There are no tariffs on foreign makers as long as they produce the cars or truck in the US.

      • jessriedel 21 hours ago

        “Completely due to” was meant in the sense of “fully reliant on” not “solely reliant on”. Tarrifs are not the only tool used, and US companies would simply not be allowed to fail, period.

    • throwawaymaths a day ago

      Moreover it's not clear how long china will be able to continue subsidizing the electric cars the way they do.

      • reaperman a day ago

        More subsidies than the $7,500 per vehicle subsidy that the US government gives for our EV vehicles?

      • yosefk a day ago

        are you sure they are subsidizing them and not simply producing them more cheaply?

    • Aromasin a day ago

      For those who aren't aware it's a 25% tarrif, so most manufacturers don't bother even trying to sell in the US. That's why almost all European/Japanese brand cars are 30+ years old over there.

      I find it entertaining when my US colleague come visit and are amazed at all the options. I drive a new Toyota Hilux, and they weren't even aware they made them anymore. For a country that once prided itself on being the land of the free market capitalist, it's a shame the decision makers are so scared now of competition.

      • HFguy a day ago

        "That's why almost all European/Japanese brand cars are 30+ years old over there"

        This is just completely incorrect. Most of European and Japanese cars are not 30+ years old in the US.

      • _thisdot a day ago

        I find the inverse interesting too. US Brands trying to sell in foreign markets. India, for instance, has a lot of Asian and European brands. But the two American brands we did have, Chevrolet and Ford, had to leave India. They were decently popular back when they were here. And I still drive a Chevy Spark from 2012.

        Ford is trying to make a comeback now though

      • xattt a day ago

        Back in the 2000s, VW released the Sirroco. I was graduating from uni, and it looked like the perfect car for me. I would have moved heaven and earth to own one. Alas, VW hemmed and hawed on homologation for North America and ultimately, it did not happen.

        I do wish we had EU-level options here.

      • mschuster91 a day ago

        > For those who aren't aware it's a 25% tarrif, so most manufacturers don't bother even trying to sell in the US. That's why almost all European/Japanese brand cars are 30+ years old over there.

        BMW has a 23.000-employee plant in South Carolina that produces X model SUVs for the entire world [1]. Volkswagen has an even larger presence [2]. No tariffs apply on these.

        [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_in_the_United_States

        [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_of_America

      • ThunderSizzle a day ago

        We haven't been the land of the free in a while, but we repeat it enough and then keep electing the uniparty in to keep it moving.

        Itjumped significantly when the Federal Reserve was founded, backed by a national and originally-unconstitutional unapportioned direct income tax to feed it money. DC suddenly had a way to tax anyone and everyone without repercussions. Then FDR played with fascism and instituted many new agencies interested in managing the economy.

        The welfare state LBJ started began the individual competing with free government money, and we've had nothing but an explosion of regulations tied to taxes or grants thanks to these categories and the hope of managing an economy to utopia.

  • reaperman a day ago

    > Traditional US car manufacturers are absolutely incompetent and will not survive competition with Chinese manufacturers

    Oh they won't have any trouble. They may lose international market share but the US government will keep raising tariffs ad infinitum to protect the US automakers no matter how far behind they get, or how expensive the vehicles get. We already are giving them 100% tariffs against BYD/etc. You might think that's absurd but the steel industry has received tariffs up to 266% against Chinese steel, so there's a lot of headroom left to continue to price out international competition.

    There's really no pressure for the US automakers to do better or innovate or actually compete.

    • ywvcbk a day ago

      Chinese companies can do the same thing Toyota and a bunch of other European and Japanese brands did.

      Open factories in NA and make their cars here. If the US companies are so incompetent they should still be able to outcompete them while paying several times higher wages and not getting any subsidies from the CCP.

    • corimaith a day ago

      Everybody (including outside the West) is raising tariffs against Chinese steel.

  • jahewson a day ago

    It’s shocking. I’ve had a non-Tesla electric car for about 5 years and the public chargers have always been garbage. The new ones are garbage too. If they do finally work, they charge at 1/4 the quoted speed. I had free charging for a while and even that was not enough of an incentive to use it.

    • tirant a day ago

      Interestingly it is a very different situation in Germany and other surrounding countries.

      I've been driving electric since 2022 (non-tesla) and I have never charged with a tesla Supercharger. They have been either more expensive than my contract or in locations far way from the highway or gas stations.

      The situation in Germany right now is extremely good, almost every gas station by the Autobahns has 150KW+ chargers available (and most of them non-Tesla). No need to plan stops anymore. And at the moment Plug-and-Charge is also working in Ionity and other stations. My BMW is able to store several contracts and I can choose beforehand which ones to use without having to resort to any app or RFID cards.

      Charging is now as easy as with Tesla, but with full market competition and many extra locations.

    • vel0city a day ago

      I've had a non-Tesla for three years now. I've never had a single problem charging at a public DC fast charger. Every time I've managed to find an open and working stall. Every time it worked either with plug and charge or took credit cards on the dispenser. My car isn't 800v so it doesn't do the full 350kW but it has always been about the speeds my car can charge at.

      I'm in North Texas and have mostly encountered chargers in Texas. I can't speak to charging elsewhere.

      > If they do finally work, they charge at 1/4 the quoted speed

      Just to confirm, 1/4 of the quoted average charging speed of your car, 1/4 the quoted peak charging speed of your car, or 1/4 the max supported speed of the charger? Few cars can actually charge at the 350kW max charge rate available. And then on top of that those cars don't actually sustain that peak rate very long, and only when it's been preconditioned and already at a low state of charge. If you're rolling in at 50-60% SoC and especially if you didn't precondition you probably are looking at only being able to charge 100kW or so. That's not the fault of the charger.

      Teslas don't charge at 250kW the entire time either. They too have charge curves and need preconditioning to hit max charge rates.

    • short_sells_poo a day ago

      Same experience in the UK. Just within London you have a dozen charging networks, they all have their own shitty apps, they require you to add your credit card and create an account and half the time they simply don't work and just give you some garbage error message like "charging failed".

      Don't even get me started on Oxford. We arrive to a charging station and it turns out it is exclusively for electric taxis. No mention of this anywhere online.

      It boils down to trial and error, and then remembering which specific charging points tend to work. For a completely new piece of infrastructure with no legacy cruft, the industry has made a complete and utter mess of it.

      • zelos a day ago

        Most UK chargers are on Electroverse now I think?

      • mavhc a day ago

        90% of the ones I use have a card reader, and not found one that doesn't work in the past 2 years, of course I'll check on zapmap comments first

  • badgersnake a day ago

    Hertz walked back their big bet on EVs. They don’t make good rental cars. For day to day use where you can charge at home or go to places you know they are great.

    For long trips to unfamiliar places, not so much.

jasoncartwright a day ago

This situation sounds like Europe (& the UK) two or three years ago. Plentiful well maintained, fast and convenient chargers have sprung up since from a wide variety of operators (electricity companies, oil companies, startups, plus Tesla).

We standardised on CCS a while ago.

Many chargers are even faster than Tesla Superchargers whilst supporting the plug-and-charge standard ISO 15118. They are often surprisingly cheap too.

  • zelos a day ago

    I was surprised just how good charger provision is in Europe. On a recent 1600 mile road trip we never had a problem finding 350kW chargers. There were always plenty of spaces free and I saw one broken charger the whole time - it maxed out at ~70kW instead of 230kW - but I just moved to the next charger in the row.

    • pornel a day ago

      The EU charging infrastructure is pretty good now.

      Tesla has no advantage here, except maybe good car navigation integration. Most Tesla Superchargers are still 400V v2 which are slower than 300kW/800V Ionity and Fastned chargers.

__m a day ago

> Crazy how no one else could figure this out.

Tesla obviously didn't figure out how to do it with third parties either. It's about cooperation and politics, not so much about the technical implementation.

  • aydyn a day ago

    They are talking about the user experience. Charging from a Tesla supercharger is completely frictionless. From a non-Tesla charger... have you ever tried it?

  • iknowstuff 21 hours ago

    Interoperability sure, but the chargers breaking left and right is a separate issue.

tw04 a day ago

>The chargers are few and far between

Where are you that the CCS chargers are few and far between? While I agree it's annoying to have to potentially use multiple apps if you aren't in a car that has a consolidation play (like fordpass), there are far more CCS chargers in the states I've visited than Tesla counterparts.

With gas station chains like Pilot, 7-eleven, Wawa, Circle-K, and others building out their own networks, and Tesla firing basically their entire charging network staff, non-Tesla chargers will only continue to grow at a faster pace than what Tesla has to offer. At least we've standardized on J3400 plugs so we can (hopefully) move away from the game of "do you have the right adapter"?

  • modeless a day ago

    I guess it's more "few" than "far between". There are a decent number of locations in e.g. grocery store parking lots but they usually only have 2-4 fast chargers and one or two are broken. So you'll show up and someone got there before you and took the last one. Meanwhile I don't think I've ever seen a Supercharger with fewer than 8 stalls and many have 20+.

  • infecto a day ago

    Non-Tesla charging locations can be hit or miss. As others have mentioned, many spots only have 2-4 stations, with at least one often out of order and others occupied by cars that have been sitting there for a while. If you manage to find a working charger, actually paying for it can be a hassle. I’ve had situations where I skipped the wait at Tesla chargers and tried another network, maybe EA. Despite having the app and using it before, it wouldn’t work. My credit card didn’t go through either, so I used my bank card, which worked for half the charge, but then stopped working for the rest.

cbm-vic-20 a day ago

> the [Tesla] charging experience couldn't be simpler, park and plug in, unplug and go. No tap, no app. Crazy how no one else could figure this out.

Agreed. I don't know why the vehicle and charger manufacturers didn't settle on a system that would let a user store credit card credentials or some other token in the car itself. When you pull up to a charger, plug in, and the charger and car do the handshake, and the car requests that a PIN be entered to release the credentials to the charger.

The charger could still support their own cumbersome apps or CC entry system (if you're trying to charge someone else's vehicle, in a rental scenario for example), but the default experience should be: pull up, plug in, enter PIN/Passkey, walk away.

  • zelos a day ago

    Fastned chargers do plug-and-charge using CCS. Works pretty well in my experience, I believe it's an open standard.

  • vel0city a day ago

    I don't have a Tesla. Almost all my DC fast charging experiences have been plug and charge.

pkulak a day ago

Well, for another anecdote from the PNW, there are dozens of combo chargers in the 300 miles North of me and 6-8 in the 300 miles south. They seem to mostly work, more are going in, and old, unreliable ones are getting swapped out. It’s not perfect, but it’s fine for me. Of course, 99% of my charging is at home.

euroderf a day ago

> The chargers are few and far between, half of them are broken, and even the ones that aren't broken have compatibility issues so they may not work anyway. The required apps are unreliable and annoying.

This also describes a lot of modern American life. I am constantly impressed by people saying how reliable the Tesla charger network is. This level of quality should be held up as an example at every opportunity. My 0.02€

appendix-rock a day ago

It’s not that Tesla has uniquely worked it out. It’s that the other options in your country basically only exist out of spite. We know how to do charging networks now. Eventually, someone in the US will see the worth in it.

hackernewds a day ago

Crazy how Tesla vastly outperformed the govt investing billions into making 8 chargers

  • epistasis a day ago

    The government investment is just getting started with deployment, and frankly waiting to standardize on NACS instead of deploying with CCS was the smart choice, even if it delayed deployment by a year or so.

    NACS is so much better and having a single standard will smooth out so much in the future.

    • kristopolous a day ago

      But globally it's not a single standard. I believe with NACS, the US once again, sits alone, like it does so often.

      Basically every other country is doing CCS, the US was deploying CCS but then the government said "nah, let's go with this other one".

      I remember when I saw companies switching to it, I seemed to be the only person who thought it was a bad idea.

      On the side of International Standardization it's me, a couple crickets, and a bunch of people telling me how wrong I am.

      • tw04 a day ago

        That’s not really accurate. Europe uses CCS2 which is completely different and incompatible with CCS1 which is what we have in the US. Recently the US agreed to move to J3400 for dc fast charging with the expectation CCS will eventually go away. China uses a fourth standard GB/T which is incompatible with any of the above.

      • mattmaroon a day ago

        What do we need it for? Are you driving your car across the Atlantic? We don’t have an international standard for what side of the road to drive on.

        Being something you practically always don’t take with you when you travel, as long as we’re standardized by continent what would even be the benefit?

      • vel0city a day ago

        Oh no I won't be able to charge my car when I do my yearly road trip from Texas to Croatia? What ever will I do.

        It's such a non-issue.

      • [removed] a day ago
        [deleted]
sandworm101 a day ago

>> The required apps are unreliable and annoying.

The requirement of an app to fuel a car is ridiculous and is one of the largest barriers for many people. Too much of our lives are already dependent on our phones. The idea that any random issue with my phone will then cause my car to not work ... that is just unacceptable. This is why airplanes don't have keys, let alone apps.

(My secure work phone is currently bricked due to an issue with my email address being moving between departments. That sort of thing is why I would never trust a phone for vital things like fueling a vehicle.)

yieldcrv a day ago

I have a Mustang mache specifically because of the Tesla supercharger authorization and compatibility

It’s still bleak-ish, but is right on the cusp of getting better

Tesla’s schizophrenic behavior makes the promised adapter to have an unknown delivery date

The bootleg adapter works decently, tricky at first though

I had to learn there are multiple versions of tesla superchargers, and even of the V3 ones they are not all the latest version that I’m supposed to use. This is undocumented.

Then, of ALL of them, the charging cable is too short and in the wrong place for my vehicle. I have to take up two spots unless I’m next to another vehicle with my ‘affliction’, rare

I dont want a Tesla I want the supercharging network

Now, knowing all these things and altering my life just a little bit around the local ones, things are great

CSS charging stations are pathetic and often have long lines, while the Tesla stations are massive, don't have a line, all while an additional doubling is occurring in a roped off section

Fortunately, you don't have to supercharge and its ill advised to do it often.

  • [removed] a day ago
    [deleted]