Comment by _DeadFred_

Comment by _DeadFred_ 3 days ago

55 replies

There are 100,000+ northern Israeli's who are refugees inside Israel because Hezbollah is firing hundred of rockets indiscriminately daily at civilian targets, but Israel doing something specifically targeted at higher level Hezbollah operatives makes you feel like Israel is doing exactly the same thing? All while you don't even yet know the reason for the Israeli op (was it to stop an imminent Hezbollah action? Seems odd that this also impacted so many operative in Syria, doesn't it? Why aren't people mentioning that this was larger than Lebanon?)

r00fus 3 days ago

Why? Why is Hezbollah firing rockets into Israel?

You don't mention Gaza or Palestinians, yet it's right there (and been there for 75+ years).

  • WorkerBee28474 3 days ago

    > Why is Hezbollah firing rockets into Israel?

    Hezbollah states that their aims include destroying Israel, instilling a Muslim government in the land, and converting the people to Islam.

    They have explicitly said that they will never coexist peacefully.

    • Cthulhu_ 2 days ago

      Yeah but what pissed them off so much? (spoiler: it was Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon)

      • nindalf 2 days ago

        From the first two sentences on wikipedia

        > The 1982 Lebanon War began on 6 June 1982, when Israel invaded Lebanon. The invasion followed a series of attacks and counter-attacks between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) operating in southern Lebanon and the Israeli military that had caused civilian casualties on both sides of the border.

        You asked "but what pissed them off so much". Maybe it was the PLO operating in Lebanon, not sure.

    • komali2 2 days ago

      [flagged]

      • shiroiushi 2 days ago

        >As the Americans discovered, this level of radicalization doesn't come naturally to people.

        It doesn't? Theocratic governments have been around for millennia. They're not some kind of modern invention; they're really just a reversion to how most societies worked in the past.

      • [removed] 2 days ago
        [deleted]
      • hersko 2 days ago

        I never understood this logic. We made peace with the Japanese and Germans after the horrors of WWII. There will probably be peace between Russia and Ukraine at some point. Only Arabs attacking a specific country seem to be infantilized to the point where every retaliation is destined to perpetuate the conflict.

    • ardfard 2 days ago

      Nice, using Islam as a scapegoat. Lebanon is a democratic republic that has 43.4% Christian population. If that is their intention, why not focus on their country first rather than attacking Israel?

      • _DeadFred_ 2 days ago

        Lebanon had a civil war along religious lines. There are many Lebanese Christians in the USA that could help you with what seems to be a misunderstanding about the country.

        Hezbollah's founders writings at the time are available online, and that they are clear about their goal being the rule of Islam. Their slogan was 'The Islamic Revolution in Lebanon'. They were founded as an Islamic revolutionary group, that is very core to who they are. Highlighting that is hardly 'using Islam as a scapegoat' whatever that means.

  • _DeadFred_ 3 days ago

    Hezbollah is firing rockets to conduct terrorism on the civilian population living in the area. Are you are OK with terrorism if you feel it's justified?

    • kombine 2 days ago

      [flagged]

      • _DeadFred_ 2 days ago

        Had Israel killed 15000 people when Hezbollah launched, I think it was 3000 rockets at civilians in an attempt to overwhelm Israel's iron dome defenses for civilians, during and immediately after Oct 7th, partnering with Hamas in ending the semi-peace that had been in place in order to kill the maximal amount if Israeli civilians/instill maximal fear? We are talking about those attacks on this thread about Lebanon.

        • kombine 7 hours ago

          > order to kill the maximal amount if Israeli civilians

          This is hasbara. Both are part of the same wider conflict in which Israel is aiming to eliminate Palestine from the map. There was never peace to begin with, including before October 7. Israeli gradual decade-long land grabs are an act of war in themselves.

  • _blk 3 days ago

    [flagged]

    • Aeolun 3 days ago

      I think the desire to throw grenades over the fence comes more from the neighbor coming over the fence once in a while and murdering anything he finds.

    • ardfard 3 days ago

      You forgot to mention your neighbor razed the yard and killed some relatives too. Throwing some Molotovs, while it may not justified, is still an expected reaction.

  • amy-petrik-214 2 days ago

    > Why is Hezbollah firing rockets into Israel?

    Why, Israel sent them a page and they are merely returning the call, as would be the right thing to do among polite company.

    • _DeadFred_ 2 days ago

      By firing thousands of rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas? That is polite, civil, and worthy of a joke to you?

gizajob 2 days ago

Well, yesterday’s actions aren’t really gonna fix that situation for those 100,000 Israelis now though are they? It wasn’t designed to make that border region safer overnight because those rockets are going to keep coming even more often now. Hezbolah might even get so pissed off they go all out and rush the border.

  • walrushunter 2 days ago

    It absolutely alleviates the situation. The rockets were going to be fired either way. Now with a few dead, a bunch of wounded, and a communication channel disabled, it's going to be harder to coordinate future rocket attacks.

  • GordonS 2 days ago

    [flagged]

    • raxxorraxor 2 days ago

      It looks like Israel wants to be secure. It was attacked in October and since then retaliated to attacks.

      It is not a terrorist attack, it was an reaction of Hezbollah indiscriminately firing rockets into Israel. That are terror attacks. Something UN troops are supposed to stop, but that is another topic.

      You can look up what Hezbollah wants and that is nothing else than the elimination of Israel. The terror is almost exclusively one sided here and it is sourced from radical fundamentalism.

      And no, Israel doesn't not murder, rape and torture, that is purely projection.

      • gizajob 2 days ago

        Personally I’m all for Israel’s security. I find it devastating how hard long term peace in the region seems to be, and how it keeps getting further and further away.

      • GordonS 2 days ago

        > It is not a terrorist attack, it was an reaction of Hezbollah indiscriminately firing rockets into Israel

        It was literally a terrorist attack - it was designed to cause terror. If Hezbollah had done this to the Israeli government or even IDF reservists, I've no doubt that you would call it a terror attack.

        And why might Hezbollah be firing rockets onto Lebanese land illegally occupied by militant Israeli settlers, I wonder? Could it also have something to do with Israel launching unprovoked airstrikes in Lebanon?[0] Israel is the occupier, Israel is the aggressor - Israel needs to stop.

        > Something UN troops are supposed to stop

        That's ironic, given how many UN staff Israel has murdered since last October.

        > And no, Israel doesn't not murder, rape and torture, that is purely projection.

        I'm sorry, but you're either incredibly misinformed, or an that's an outright lie - even the UN says Israel has institutionalised the use of abuse, torture, sexual abuse and rape[1][2]. Even B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, agrees with this![3]

        I've read countless reports of Israel torturing Palestinian hostages - they are doing it on a huge scale, and in mind-bendingly evil ways.

        Israel is a sick, apartheid regime that must be stopped.

        [0] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/25/israel-launches-att...

        [1] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/08/israels-esca...

        [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_and_gender-based_violen...

        [3] https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-rights-gro...

cornercasechase 3 days ago

[flagged]

  • ghufran_syed 3 days ago

    Sure, except Moses and the Jewish people were on the land around 1500 BC, and the Islamic religion didn't start until after 500 CE. So the Jewish people got there at least 2000 years earlier, so if we are doing the "who ethnically cleansed who" game, I think the Jewish people appear to be at most, reversing the previous ethnic cleansing? Or is there some kind of moral "expiry date" on ethnic cleansing?

    • treetalker 2 days ago

      This is a pretty heated thread, and I’m not trying to fan any flames: the Assyrians and Sumerians were there before that. It always seemed a bit arbitrary to me to claim land based on whose religion started first — although not quite as arbitrary as “my God said it’s mine, so there.” Plus I believe they claimed that Ashur promised the land to them.

    • ardfard 3 days ago

      I think we can all agree that the ancient Roman and Byzantine empires were not exactly gold standards in protecting human rights. However, the fact that something was done to the Jews thousands of years ago does not make it acceptable to do the same to another population today.

    • cheeseomlit 3 days ago

      The birth of Islam did not cause a whole new race of people to spring from the ground, some of their ancestors lived in the region as well. And according to the Torah the Jewish people who came to that region with Moses during the exodus had to fight off the caananites and philistines before they could settle, so apparently itd been occupied for a while- not that I'd put too much stock in the ancient history thats come down to us, certainly not enough to enforce modern territorial claims

  • _DeadFred_ 3 days ago

    Ah so indiscriminate rocket attacks on civilians is OK if you like the reason for it. Heck of a stance to take.

  • PixyMisa 2 days ago

    There are two million Arabs and Muslims living as citizens of Israel.

    They have more rights in Israel than they would in any Arab nation.

    Gaza was handed back entirely to Palestinian rule in 2005. Everything Jewish was removed, even graves.

  • light_hue_1 2 days ago

    Violently expanding into Gaza?

    You don't know even the most basic facts.

    Israel left Gaza. It gave the Palestinians what they wanted. Their own area with no settlers. Israel forcefully removed all of its people from all of Gaza.

    In exchange they immediately voted in a terrorist organization as their government and began to attack Israel over and over again.

    • cornercasechase 2 days ago

      Almost a million people are displaced in Gaza (violently) as we speak.

      • light_hue_1 2 days ago

        How is this violently expanding into Gaza?

        That's like saying that during the us invasion of Iraq to replace the regime the US expanded into Iraq. It did not. The us didn't settle Iraq.

        I stand by my statement that people here talk with authority without knowing even the most basic facts.

        • cornercasechase 2 days ago

          The US definitely violently expanded into Iraq. What Israel is doing is even more extreme.

    • aguaviva 2 days ago

      Violently expanding into Gaza?

      Yes, very violently, and on a massively greater scale than before. Just ask the country's National Security Minister:

      Backing settlement, Ben Gvir says he’d be ‘very happy to live in Gaza’ after the war

      If ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Palestinians leave the Strip, ‘we will be able to bring in more and more people,’ minister says

      https://www.timesofisrael.com/backing-settlement-ben-gvir-sa...

      • light_hue_1 2 days ago

        [flagged]

        • aguaviva 2 days ago

          Do you even believe this nonsense?

          Of course the guy's a lunatic. He also happens to have a lot of support within certain very powerful circles, not in spite of but because of what he's proposing to do in Gaza, and for his lunatic, outright fascistic worldview generally. That's why they made him National Security Minister, after all.

          There was nothing remotely racist in my post, and I don't appreciate the smear.

  • jojobas 2 days ago

    There are like 20% Arabs among Israel citizens. The are about 20 (not %, just 20) Jews in Lebanon. Who's ethnically cleansing whom again?

    Both Jews and Palestinian Arabs have legitimate claims against each other. The levels of barbarity in pursuing these claims is not even remotely comparable.

  • yadaeno 3 days ago

    How is it ethnically cleansed if 20% of the Israeli population is native?

    • FridayoLeary 3 days ago

      By native i assume you mean arab. Not to mention that the infant mortality rate dropped something like 90% after the state was founded and the arab population is still growing at a huge rate.

    • judahmeek 3 days ago

      The percentage of native population used to be 100%, so I don't think pointing out the change in percentage really works in favor of your argument.

      • olalonde 2 days ago

        Not necessarily, this can happen with immigration alone. For example, French and English descendants used to form a much greater percentage of the Canadian population, yet they were not "ethnically cleansed".

        • ardfard 2 days ago

          Yes, a flood of immigration combined with systematically displacing the local population. See the Nakba and Settler movement.

      • yadaeno 2 days ago

        Doesn’t it depend on the time scale?

        If we are talking about pre-globalization many countries are no longer have a majority “native” population. (US, Japan, Taiwan, parts of Europe) and that is just the reality of human history.

        I think we have to decide on a time when the back and fourth geocoding between groups is no longer acceptable. Most of the world thinks it’s around the end of ww2 and the start of globalization, but are you contending that it should be later, and the Arabs should take back Israel?