Comment by wkat4242
Comment by wkat4242 3 days ago
Ahh so a simple supply chain attack. I was thinking it might have leveraged the built in batteries. But it was always unlikely, especially in a receive-only device.
Still, if you have the capability of such a supply chain attack, I would imagine the rewards of silent surveillance (tracking, audio) would be of much higher value than this kind of attack where 3 out of 1000s targets were killed.
3 killed but thousands inoperative and hospitals flooded - I would expect an immediate armed escalation