Comment by conductr

Comment by conductr 3 days ago

24 replies

We pay for a private school, it's expensive yes and I know not accessible for all, but it's kind of the best of both worlds. You get to choose the school and it's a community vibe. It helps when the other kids, potential bullies, know your kid and know their parents talk to your parents. It also helps as the staff is acutely tuned in to things like this, and they have amazing ways of conflict resolutions. It's not difficult, it just requires some attention and thought. They reinforce golden rule type actions/behaviors/leading by example/etc. As an example, if one kid picks on another one, instead of detention - they will both be given a 'private talk' and then paired up on some activity. The result is, they were constructively scolded then had a chance to bond and become friends - and it works. It's never going to be fully eradicated, but it's amazing just how little there is and how supportive everyone is in trying to develop good humans.

They also assess the kids emotional maturity early on. Those that they feel are not ready to go from Kinder to 1st get a 'Primer' year. It's basically holding them back in Kinder but with a positive twist.

Tons of other benefits as the parents hold a lot of power (since we pay). But also, the quality of staff/teachers, and low ratios are quite a perk compared to our area's public schools which are poorly rated.

I went to public school myself, and while I was never bullied, I do think I was a target of bullies at some time. Any time I felt like someone was bullying me, I fought back and would often be disciplined under zero tolerance rules. That's how my parents taught me to deal with it, 'stand up for yourself boy' kind of thing. We've taught our kid not to hit and to be kind and he is, but that's exactly what I think would make him a huge target in a public school environment.

drak0n1c 3 days ago

This is why introducing a degree of school choice is becoming a popular policy among parents in both parties, but I think bringing back rapid expulsion to disciplinary boys/girls schools would be even more impactful. Unfortunately, recent social justice activism has stymied that possibility in progressive areas. Either restore unfettered power of self-curation to the environment and ensure it is wielded effectively, or parents will demand more flexibility in choosing from non-monopoly options.

  • pempem 3 days ago

    I'm sorry - you're following all the comments about public schools being like a prison and you're suggesting people get expelled faster or disciplined more to improve schools?

    • bdangubic 3 days ago

      my kid goes to private school. expelled students by grade:

      1st: 2

      2nd: 4

      3rd: 4

      4th: 3

      5th: 5

      6th: 3 (so far)

      why am I saying this? we pay tens of thousands of dollars per year for having access to this kind of environment. if there is a kid who is fucking up everyone else, the “everyone else” should not have to suffer through it. I would pay double what I pay now for this priviledge for my kid. so yes, 100%, more expelling and more discipline is needed

      • Aeolun 3 days ago

        Isn’t that an absurd indictment of your school? If my (converted) $30k/year school had to expel even a single student every year that would be a massive failure in my eyes.

        • bdangubic 3 days ago

          I am not sure I am following what you are saying here? what kind of failure?

          there is a lot of parents that have money to pay for private education for their kids and there is also a lot of those kids that are fuckups.

          if you mean failure of the parents - you are 100% - complete failure of the parents.

      • programjames 3 days ago

        The crazy thing is, the American populace is already paying ~15k per student for public education. Why are they not expelling kids who are fucking up that environment?

    • quacked 3 days ago

      Prisons would be a lot safer if the dangerous inmates got kicked out of prison and left behind the ones who didn't attack other inmates.

      If you want to improve schools quickly, expelling problem kids is the easiest way to do it. But that would cause consequences to the expelled kids, as well as society.

      • influx 3 days ago

        Often dangerous inmates are moved to higher security prisons. Gang members are segregated, etc.

      • Purplehermann 3 days ago

        "Your kids should take one for society" is an atrocious pitch.

        "Your kids should be stuck with people who ruin their lives because criminals are" is also terrible.

        The correct response is moving problem kids to problem schools, then to disciplinary schools, and if necessary to juvy.

        Put people where they belong, with the people they belong with.

        Otherwise the people stuck with the trash will leave (and maybe that's okay in the end)

    • pempem 3 days ago

      I suppose we're reading and experiencing different things. Here's what I'm reading:

      April 2021: https://publications.csba.org/california-school-news/april-2...

      Ballard Brief at BYU: https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/racial-inequality-...

      2018 GAO report: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-18-258

      I've been following the topic for a while as a minority and I worry about this as well as cops in our schools continuously raising the specter of violence and school shootings raising the real concern of violence.

      It doesn't feel like expelling students has reduced violence or improved the quality of the day to day when I see the tracking of these issues.

    • keeganpoppen 3 days ago

      yeah, in what world would that not help? they're not getting kicked out of the school system, just the school. lowest-common-denominator idealism like you are espousing here is one of the primary reasons why schools have gotten so terrible.

      • munksbeer 2 days ago

        Obviously there is a bigger picture in all of this. I don't know what the correct balance is, but assume that all problem kids (for some strict definition of problem) were expelled and placed in a "problem school". I highly doubt that is going to improve that child's life or attitude, but obviously it will help those at the previous school. So we end up with a large number of kids who will almost certainly grow up to be "problem adults", in many cases criminals. Suddenly the problem you solved for the first school is now the problem of society at large.

        In a perfect world, most of those problem children would be mentored correctly in regular schools and given a path to a better adult life, and therefore not create a future "problem adult".

        In practice, it doesn't seem to work like that, and I agree, "problem children" do cause frictions and disruptions and worse for other children at regular schools.

jcarrano 3 days ago

I find it appalling that parent who can afford a private school, even with much sacrifice, would instead send their children to a a public school.

It is the equivalent of eating soup at a homeless shelter when you can go to the store and buy something better, made worse by the fact that you are making the decision for someone else that cannot decide on their own.

  • FlyingAvatar 3 days ago

    You have a choice of what public school your child goes to based on where you live. Many parents “shop” for their schools in this way.

  • nothercastle 3 days ago

    There is an assumption that private is better always and that’s not true. Top 10-20% of private is better but it’s expensive and not available to most. There is a lot of poor and low quality private too.

  • saagarjha 2 days ago

    Kids make do at good public schools. Source: went to one of them.

  • meetingthrower 2 days ago

    Lol. My public school sent 10% of its senior class to ivy league schools last year. I'll take it. Not all of them are inner city hell holes.

ACow_Adonis 3 days ago

I attended a private school for a couple of years, and I have to say it was worse than the public ones.

Now obviously this is going to be neighbourhood, country, and community specific, but the problem I had with observing private schools was that now the school had an additional incentive not to expel students, rich and influential parents had extra influence over whether their child could be disciplined and how the school should do things, and half of the time the problematic behaved people were... the rich people and their children. Having and paying money isn't exactly a free ticket to well-adjusted children especially if the children are mimicking the culture they see at home and the society awards bullying and various behaviours with more money... Which most of ours do.

And this was on top of the downsides of private schools: being image obsessed over academics and intellectual investigation, surrounded by non egalitarian private school twats, and bunches of arbitrary private school rules. Now obviously this is not all private schools, but in the same way it's not all public schools either.

I think in this system it's a roll of the die. In my country, neighbourhood and in my life, my kid is currently going to public school and, touch wood... thriving for now. The other private schools around here have too much woo like Waldorf and Steiner and they steer away from evidence based methods in literacy and numeracy.

But I don't know if that's going to hold off into the older ages, and I can't promise, much to my wife's chagrin, not to consider homeschooling considering my own experience of high school also approaching that of a dysfunctional prison and a poor educational environment.

PS: there was plenty of interpersonal violence at the private schools when I grew up.