haswell 13 hours ago

Read about the notion of “spiritual bypass”.

Yes, people turn to faith and religion. But this often amounts to a complete bypass of actually processing/reframing difficult feelings (like regret) and instead of learning to use those feelings to learn/grow and make your future less regretful, they’re offloaded onto some entity who is supposed to carry the load for you.

It works for some people for a period of time because they feel like they have permission to let go. Until it stops working because letting go isn’t enough. Actually processing these feelings is necessary but gets ignored, and eventually this build up and leads to burnout/breakdown.

(I was steeped in the church from a young age, and have watched countless people find the limits of this approach).

Better to confront things head-on.

  • brodouevencode 12 hours ago

    I can speak about Christianity, because I'm a Christian.

    > they’re offloaded onto some entity who is supposed to carry the load for you

    This isn't supposed to happen, and in fact can be considered sinful. Christians are supposed to pick up their cross and carry it.

    • haswell 11 hours ago

      I was raised in a Christian church. Spiritual bypass was alive and well. The notion of "carrying one's cross" was more about finding virtue in suffering than it was about actually gaining practical tools to navigate life's difficulties or learning how to process them in a psychologically healthy way.

      > This isn't supposed to happen, and in fact can be considered sinful

      And this highlights the problem with turning to religion as a primary solution for dealing with life's major emotional challenges. If you don't happen to find the "true" Christians, you're out of luck. There's a wide variety of opinions and interpretations.

      Unfortunately not a single one of the dozen or so churches my family bounced around while I was growing up had an enlightened view of this.

      And I still have fundamental problems with "bearing one's cross" (the "correct" way) in terms of the actual psychological benefit. It personalizes things that happen in life that need not be personalized. Instead of establishing a rational reason for acceptance that can actually bring psychological freedom, it attaches the idea that it's your lot in life to suffer these specific things, which is a deeply harmful idea psychologically in the long run.

      e.g. if I do something that I later regret deeply, the church says "you fucked up, and now you must feel bad about it". A more reasonable mindset is to use the regret as a signal that change is needed. To choose how to live differently in the future based on that regret. And then to leave that regret behind since the past can't be undone.

  • nindalf 13 hours ago

    It took me until I was 19 to understand this and accept it. The reason for my failure wasn't because some higher was displeased with my lack of piety or because of some deep mysterious plan the universe had.

    I failed for a much more mundane reason - I didn't work hard enough, or I didn't have the right tactics/strategy or the dice roll simply didn't go my way. In the first two cases I know what I need to fix and I can fix that. In the third case, I simply must shrug my shoulders and move on.

    But I was no longer sitting there unhappy about some extra terrestrial being not giving me the help I asked for. The religious mindset was making me unhappy because it made me think I had no control over my life, someone else did.

    Once I accepted that I had control of my life I was much happier and also more successful.

  • roninorder 12 hours ago

    I witnessed spiritual bypass many times in the context of people becoming "spiritual" as an emotional avoidance strategy. It's even more tragic in my experience because at least traditional religions have very strong and developed frameworks for addressing various types of grief - both individually and as a group.

    Modern-day spiritualism is dominated by shallow inspiration masquerading as profound psychological and medical insight. Courses on "raising vibrational frequency", literal belief in astrology, crystal healing, etc.

croes 12 hours ago

Does it? Or is it just shifting responsibility?

It's a kind of narcissistic wound to accept that we make bad decisions.

To learn to let go such regret is a big achievement for our further life.

VoodooJuJu 13 hours ago

[flagged]

  • yoyohello13 11 hours ago

    > But lament not. These rationalists can be exploited for fun, profit, and votes.

    Implying that religious people are not (have not) been exploited in this way for centuries?

  • ziddoap 11 hours ago

    >But lament not. These rationalists can be exploited for fun, profit, and votes.

    Wow, very pleasant and inspiring. What a wonderful thing to encourage (and, dare I say, on brand).

  • zelphirkalt 13 hours ago

    Exploiting for profit -- That sounds exactly like what some religious structures are doing. Perhaps "fun" for them, but bad for the ones exploited.

    • roninorder 12 hours ago

      I am an atheist but it's preposterous to dismiss the fact that a vast number of people find healing in organized or individualized religion. Or to suggest that the sole purpose of religion is exploitation for profit.