Comment by sampton

Comment by sampton 3 days ago

29 replies

It's crazy we are hunting tuna to extinction yet here is perfectly good python meat going to landfill. Florida needs to build a marketing campaign to make wild python a delicacy.

rocketpastsix 3 days ago

Pythons in SW Florida are found to have dangerously high levels of mercury[0] so it may not be as perfectly good as hoped for.

[0]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31256202/

  • sfilmeyer 3 days ago

    >dangerously high levels of mercury

    All the better for a tuna substitute!

    More seriously, from your article

    >4.86 mg/kg in liver tissue from a snake that was 4.7 m long but overall averaged 0.12 ± 0.19 mg/kg in tail tip

    Tuna looks like it's about 0.39 mg/kg, so the liver tissue is suuuuper high but the tail tip is just normal high mercury.

    • vintermann 3 days ago

      Eating predator livers is a bad idea in any case.

      • SideburnsOfDoom 3 days ago

        Tuna are also predators. And high in mercury. Not a co-incidence.

  • aspenmayer 3 days ago

    As pythons are probably bioaccumulators of mercury due to their position in the food chain, would it be fair to say that the pythons are canaries? Perhaps that is another reason to shoot the messenger.

    • IAmBroom 2 days ago

      Canaries, except that they don't die easily, and do attack and eat the miners. And can slip out of cages.

      So nothing like.

      • aspenmayer 2 days ago

        Sounds like they've improved the living conditions and diet of the canaries, er, pythons.

        Shame about the miner incident.

metaphor 3 days ago

Consider water spinach[1]---a.k.a. swamp weed in Florida, but also known as kangkung amongst Asian households---to which the USDA apparently classifies as a "noxious weed". It can be prepared for consumption in many ways, but I especially love it in a Filipino sour soup dish called sinigang[2].

If you want to buy this "noxious weed" in Florida (or anywhere in CONUS, for that matter), you'll need to skip Walmart and make a trip to your local Asian produce store, where it can be found profitably sold for pennies on the dollar. Why? At face value, the ethnic majority simply don't consume this green, and in any case, its natural supply far outstrips market demand, making it far less attractive for most sellers to justify retaining inventory.

Now consider pythons that have invaded the Florida Everglades. Suppose the market for this were to flip in a similar way that beef oxtail has: a cut of "trash" meat historically shunned by the ethnic majority (but favored by certain ethnic minorities and the poor for its low cost and exceptional flavor) which has seen a major market repricing upward driven by the popularity of certain ethnic dishes. Or how short ribs (kalbi) and skin-on pork belly (samgyupsal) have seen significant upward repricing and market availability as KBBQ restaurants grow in popularity throughout the country (fire suppression equipment and commercial fire code compliance being primary enablers around my locality).

In the case of beef/pork cuts, the market simply recognizes value and prices are set consistent with supply/demand...it's just optimizing margins on an existing large scale process.

But would such a scenario really work out when the source of meat is an invasive species that Florida is looking to wholesale exterminate? I mean if the market wins, the state has a problem; and if the state wins, it's difficult to imagine how the market naturally materializes. Gator tail in the South is the closest proxy equivalent I can think of, but for all intents and purposes, it's a novelty dish which has hardly gained market traction at scale.

I don't know...random food for discussion, so to speak.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipomoea_aquatica

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinigang

  • aspenmayer 3 days ago

    Maybe look at market for other foraged products like ginseng and truffles to see what might happen? Those are supposedly difficult to farm, but I don’t see why pythons would be.

    • metaphor 3 days ago

      Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting farming pythons as a prospective solution?

      Assuming this is the case (that would likely mitigate the mercury bioaccumulation hazard), it may be doable, but that would only make business development sense if an addressable market actually exists.

      I say "may" because it's unclear what a notional python farmer would feed such a carnivore that's both cost-effective at scale and isn't a disease vector itself. Corn is the answer for chicken, pigs, and (unfortunately) cows. In Japan, farmed unagi are fed a highly nutritious semi-solid paste that's relatively expensive...but demand for unagi in Japan alone is absurdly high and priced accordingly, with cultural significance providing additional market support.

      I imagine the incentive to create a market for python meat would be primarily driven as a way to combat its invasive status in Florida...to which consuming farmed python does nothing to address this underlying root environmental issue.

      • aspenmayer 3 days ago

        I agree that farming wouldn’t address the environmental issue. I was mentioning farming because you mentioned supply chains. Snakes are picky about what they eat, but they eat mice, and there are already live mice supply chains, so that is probably the cheapest way to feed them: just outsource it. I think that snakes are already farmed in other Gulf states where alligators are farmed, so I don’t think there’s room for much innovation here. It was just food for thought for you and others.

        I don’t think that marketing the snake as a delicacy would do anything but increase the demand for the snakes. When incentives have been advertised and paid for invasive species in the past, breeders immediately started cashing in, so there are limits to how much nudging you can do, and how you can do it, or you will have rewarded bad behavior and perhaps created negative externalities that did not exist before.

        I was trying to explore the idea of farming them and what would happen if consuming them became popular, which is likely farming them unless prohibited, which would probably be cheaper than catching them. If the wild ones are higher in mercury, then farmed ones might be worth less even though they are healthier, due to potential subsidies to promote eradicating them and charges due to it being a wild caught novelty menu item. This could create perverse incentives leading people to adulterate farmed pythons to pass them off as wild ones. I think the entire idea is fraught and isn’t as simple as a comment thread might make it seem, not that I think you are minimizing the issue. I just don’t know if any individual comment can do the issue justice, so it’s hard to explore the issue in bite size pieces.

        • metaphor 3 days ago

          Great points and in full agreement. Thanks for broadening my perspective!

nine_k 3 days ago

Before the advent of sushi, tuna was a low-value catch, mostly used for cat food and such. I don't see why python meat cannot be used similarly.

  • seb1204 3 days ago

    Salmon as well as I recall. It was a Norwegian advertising campaign that made is desirable.

    • vintermann 3 days ago

      I don't know its prestige as food, but its prestige as catch has been high for a long time. A hundred years before Norway had a salmon farming industry, it had a salmon fishing tourism industry, consisting of various British lords.

      • arnsholt 3 days ago

        Apparently salmon was considered dubious in Japan as sushi. I forget the details, but I think something about freshwater fish being inappropriate for sushi due to the possibility of a parasite in the meat that only lived in fresh water, not salt. So salmon for sushi was apparently pushed hard in Japan by Norwegian authorities and the salmon industry, I think in the late 80s or the 90s?

        • [removed] 2 days ago
          [deleted]
    • esseph 2 days ago

      Alaska has a very different and extremely positive view on salmon in its many forms.

hinkley 3 days ago

Feed it to pigs and eat the pigs?

  • TZubiri 3 days ago

    That doesn't get rid of the pigs and is exactly how mercury accumuation works, it would even exacerbate the process.

TylerE 3 days ago

There is very little meat on a snake.

  • chasd00 3 days ago

    Also lots and lots of bones. I’ve had rattlesnake before, it’s not bad (taste like chicken) but man so many bones.

    • TylerE 3 days ago

      Yes, exactly. A snake is mostly bones and digestive tract. Almost no fat (they’re ambush predators and only eat every few weeks typically).

  • metaphor 3 days ago

    Not just any snake...these are Burmese pythons[1].

    [1] https://youtu.be/0wXeRStcG6A?t=173

    • TylerE 3 days ago

      Yes, there’s still not much meat on them, and it’s not meats want to eat. Carnivore meat tends to be extremely gamey.

      • metaphor 3 days ago

        The 9 footer in the video should weight around ~25 lbs, good for around 4-5 lbs of consumable meat...not a bad harvest considering level of effort to butcher relative to, say, deer.

        Acknowledged on the potential excessive human consumption hazard and gaminess, but I'd like to think it's still possible for one man's trash to be another's prospective opportunity.