Comment by squircle

Comment by squircle a day ago

2 replies

It sounds like they have little skin in the game. Does your org reward hard work and hitting targets? Is the company doing mission critical work or feature farming? I dont think there's a company I've ever worked for where the status quo wasn't a full on regression to the mean average of the culture of the place. Conway's law? They were hired for a reason but no one can be firehosed with bullshit for long, before simply giving up if there's no compelling reason to continue striving.

So, have you spoken to them? Or, put them in a position where there failure to deliver will have real world negative consequences to people on the team they care about?

For me personally, I seem to only operate well under intense pressure and heavy load. Maybe they're bored. Maybe there's confounding variables outside of work they need to put time and attention into before they're unblocked and consistently in a high delivery flow state. (Or, perhaps, you need to tell them: we want you to try harder to fail.)

Edit: also, work expands to fill time. Intellectual and creative work accomplishes things in leaps and bounds or fits and starts IMO. Punching a time clock is terribly draining... Is there a shared team vision?

tropicalfruit a day ago

> Does your org reward hard work and hitting targets?

We have a flat team structure so there is not much room for progression, especially as they are here for 10 years so already maxed out promotions. But thats something I cant control.

  • ryandrake a day ago

    Yikes, as an employee, "not much room for progression" and "maxed out promotions" aren't really phrases that I'd want to hear spoken aloud. I was going to comment that the behavior described sounds like someone who doesn't see any future growth potential in the company, but here it is, spelled out!

    Every job I've quit, I decided to do so when I realized that I had hit a (visible or invisible) ceiling that the company was preventing me from breaking through.