Comment by pcblues

Comment by pcblues 2 days ago

34 replies

If you remove yourself from a group, how will they change their minds without a dissenting opinion? I had to do it myself eventually, for my own sanity, but I believe this is still a real problem I am no longer addressing among my loved ones.

rdegges 2 days ago

In my case, my goal isn't to change anyone's mind. It's to preserve sanity -- I can't in good faith "pretend" to get along and have normal conversations when people are actively engaging in behavior that directly harms myself and others.

  • fastball a day ago

    Could you give an example of behavior that "directly" harmed yourself or others which caused you to sever ties?

    Politics is almost always indirect, usually with multiple levels of indirection.

    • Philpax a day ago

      People proudly voting for parties and policies that demonise trans people, of which I know many. I cannot be your friend in good conscience if you're willing to destroy the lives of my other friends.

      • bigstrat2003 a day ago

        That is, by definition, indirect. So that doesn't qualify as "directly harming" anyone, even if your analysis of those policies is otherwise accurate.

      • duckfan a day ago

        How are their lives being destroyed?

        Being told that you have to follow the same rules as everyone else for e.g. spaces designated to be used solely by the opposite sex, doesn't seem so bad.

    • StefanBatory 19 hours ago

      I am bi, my "friends" would hate LGBT people, constantly talk how we're pedophiles and so on, and kept voting for parties against equal rights.

      • fastball 7 hours ago

        If your "friends" were calling you or your other friends pedophiles (and you are not) then yes, absolutely, you should not be friends with them.

  • bakugo a day ago

    So, basically, you believe that everyone who doesn't strictly adhere to your own ideologies is insane.

    You're pretty much the exact kind of person that the article talks about.