Comment by submeta

Comment by submeta 4 days ago

127 replies

I went fully digital some years ago, gave away most of my printed books and bought ebooks only. Now I have my whole library in Calibre and on my Kindle. Why? Because I have my whole library with me. And I can download my highlights and process them. Into notes in Obsidian, that I can link to in my study notes.

Recently I started buying paper based books again. Man, I missed holding physical books in my hands. And I start to regret having gotten rid of my physical library. There were so many memories I had with most of these books. I remember their covers, and instantly my emotions , thoughts, feelings are triggered. I don’t have these emotions when I think of my digital books.

My spouse has books that she was gifted when she was a child. Still in our kids shelf. I cannot give her my digital books.

I regret the decision having gone fully digital, which can only be a complement to physical books.

Printed books are a physical experience. Something that allows me to attach thoughts, emotions, feelings to it. And they can become part of my life. Like a good friend.

NoboruWataya 4 days ago

And let's be honest, a good book collection is a great addition to a room, aesthetically. People tend not to talk about that aspect, I think they worry about being seen as pretentious showing off their books. But I think a book collection can be a great decoration, just as flowers or a painting can be.

And if you have family or friends over and one of them sees something they like, you can lend it to them there and then (if you are so inclined). Some of my earliest reading-related memories are being in an uncle's or neighbour's house and being fascinated by a book on a shelf that they kindly let me take home to read.

  • illiac786 3 days ago

    I actually made the opposite experience. Books nowadays have so many different format and colors, it’s really hard to make it esthetically pleasing, I have multiple walls full of books and they look like a mess, I dislike it.

    Even if I could make it look nice, it would then be an intellectual mess, it wouldn’t be organised properly, I would struggle to find anything.

    Actually, good question, how do you people organise your books? (Full disclosure, I’m messy)

    • iamacyborg 3 days ago

      Learn French and then you can have a wall of books with white spines.

    • duckmysick 3 days ago

      I organize them by the color, either rainbow-style or from darker to brighter.

      > it wouldn’t be organised properly, I would struggle to find anything.

      Libraries solve this with the Dewey Decimal Classification. Most people don't have enough books for it make sense though.

      For me, I don't have that many paper books and the ones I own I know by the side and the color. I keep the books that I reference often in a separate place. I noticed I don't need to find all of the books, all of the time. So organize most of your books to look pretty.

      You can also group similar books together on a single shelf and then order them by color. For example I have a dozen of cookbooks and those go on a separate shelf, arranged in a rainbow. I also have a book series that goes neatly together, so I keep them it grouped too.

      I also organize my clothes like that too. By general category first (t-shirts, pants, socks, jackets), and then by color.

      I used to be extremely messy too (piles of clothes and documents, cardboard boxes, you know the deal). I turned it around after I read the Marie Kondo book "The life-changing Magic of Tidying up". Then after I got the mess under control I look at the pictures for inspiration how to make it aesthetically pleasing. I got a lot of ideas from Pinterest (I know, I know), but you can do an image search or check the organization subreddits too.

    • internet_points 3 days ago

      Put them backwards in the shelves – now everything is calm and paper-coloured.

      • mrweasel 3 days ago

        Doesn't that make it exceedingly hard to locate specific books?

        One thing I have notices about modern books is that they are a freaking huge. I have a large number of novels from the 1970s. Their are all 250 - 400 pages, about the the same as my wife's moderns books about people getting murdered. The 50 year old books are less than half the size. Why is there a need to make modern books into tomes?

  • djhn 4 days ago

    And they improve room acoustics a decent amount, making the space that much more pleasant.

    • Obscurity4340 4 days ago

      Are books like a natural version of those fancy futuristic sound panels in recording studios?

      • bongodongobob 3 days ago

        Yeah, diffusers. Smears first reflection time. Probably some low end absorbtion too.

  • knighthack 3 days ago

    While I agree with the sentiment, I have hesitation in letting people see what I read.

    In a way, you're letting people see the nature of things that you read - from which they might glean the nature of your thoughts, and privacy is something we all value. For that reason (and since I don't have any particular sentimental value for books, only their contents) I've long since preferred a digital library. As a minimalist, having a single Kindle on the table is aesthetics enough for me, which is complementary of the minimalist viewpoint as well.

    However, I completely agree with the fact that having a physical library is a very conducive environment for kids to grow up with. I remember fun memories of my childhood reading from the home library, and thinking how pretty and colourful the shelves were too. But I think there should be a distinction between cultivating a library for your kids, versus that for the observation and assessment of strangers.

    • dbtc 3 days ago

      That, to me, is closer to a policy of isolation than privacy, which sounds unhealthy to me, unless maybe you're some kind professional spy or military strategist. Privacy is good; so are water and salt. We also value connection.

      Minimalism is secretly about maximizing something, perhaps empty space and silence, or perhaps something else that you love.

      Finally, life is layered on as we live it - that kid is still in there somewhere ;)

      I'm not trying to prescribe necessarily, just giving a different point of view.

    • baq 3 days ago

      > While I agree with the sentiment, I have hesitation in letting people see what I read.

      Woah there. Nobody* is showing off their playboy collection either. The visible bookshelf is just what you want others to see. You don’t even have to read those books. It’s like your Facebook wall - a facade of yourself.

      * of course there are people proud of their playboy collection and showing it off

    • Loughla 3 days ago

      Do you not have human conversations with your friends and family? That's also a way for them to learn about you.

      I like your view in this because it's just so different than anything I've thought before. Having books in common areas sparks conversation, real, substantive conversation with family, friends, and acquaintances. It's one of my favorite things to talk about at get togethers.

    • Saigonautica 3 days ago

      I've been thinking about this a lot lately. I share what I read, but only with very close friends. I'm hesitant to lend books out -- people are not great at returning them (partly my fault, I'm also bad at tracking the loans). I also have a hard time finding my books, as I live in a very small house (bookshelves are out of the question, it's numbered bins).

      I am also wary of most of the cloud services in this domain.

      So I wrote a little software to manage the situation -- just a simple CRUD thing that lets me manage a small personal library, or a small shared library between friends. It's not a "social network for books" or something grand like that. Just a simple self-hosted thing with minimal system requirements. There were some existing solutions, but none that really felt right.

      It's published (open source) and has a few users, but I don't think I'll be able to manage it, if it receives a giant burst of attention. On github it's called 'ubiblio'. Perhaps I'll be ready to share it more generally in a few months.

      Not sure if it's useful to you, but I hope it is!

    • brador 3 days ago

      Amazon through the kindle is storing massive amounts of data about your reading habits. Statistically, and inevitably, this information will be used against your best interests.

      Maybe simply to sell you something you don’t need, to price up your insurance, or as a layup to a precrime you have yet to commit.

      If reading privacy matter a kindle isn’t it. Imho.

    • neuralRiot 3 days ago

      To me “minimalism” is just a poor excuse for bad design and aesthetic sense, like dressing all black or white to avoid color coordination. It’s easy, but totally devoid of personality and expression.

    • Clubber 3 days ago

      >from which they might glean the nature of your thoughts, and privacy is something we all value.

      I mean you let them into your house, privacy kinda goes out the window when you do that. You can always put books you don't want people to know you read in your bedroom or something.

    • michaelt 3 days ago

      > I have hesitation in letting people see what I read [...] privacy is something we all value.

      Other people are replying to you acting like this is strange, but it's actually something normal people do all the time.

      Every politician being interviewed from their home for TV news, every professor recording video lectures, every remote working CEO, and every twitch streamer has considered what is on display behind them.

      If I choose shelves as my background, do I want eagle-eyed viewers to see my copies of playboy, my figurines of naked anime ladies, and my copies of the communist manifesto and mein kampf? As a matter of fact I don't.

      • kristiandupont 3 days ago

        I get that sentiment, it's not like I would put everything on display indiscriminately.

        However, a statement like this "they might glean the nature of your thoughts", strikes me as .. lonely, if nothing else. I want privacy from Facebook and the general public, etc. But people that I invite into my house are people I am going to have conversations with and I want them to know the "real me", whatever that means, or at least a closer approximation of it. I certainly wouldn't want them to think that my political beliefs are something completely different from what they actually are.

    • tolerance 3 days ago

      How do you get along with communicating to others?

    • bnetd 3 days ago

      >In a way, you're letting people see the nature of things that you read - from which they might glean the nature of your thoughts

      Nobody cares what you think. But if there are state-sponsored actors that do, they have way more insight into your life than the _nature of things that you read_ from physical texts you own. Digital library gives off a much resonant footprint in this regard.

  • eleveriven 3 days ago

    It’s a window into your interests, personality

    • itishappy 3 days ago

      Sure, but so is every interaction with me. Surely the friends you've just invited into your home are already privy to much of this info?

graemep 4 days ago

I will not buy DRMed ebooks. I hate the idea that someone can delete a book I bought. Once I have a book, I want to keep it.

I have quite a lot of books that belong to be grandfather, and lots that belonged to my parents. A lot of those will last another generation, maybe more. That does not happen with ebooks either.

  • op00to 4 days ago

    I buy books and immediately rip the drm out. They get their money, I get my book.

    • hagbard_c 3 days ago

      Where do you live? If you live in the USA you're violating the DMCA, if you live in the EU it is the EUCD which you'll be breaking, elsewhere there may be similar directives. That 'they get their money' does not make any difference here, it is the 'circumvention of technological protection measures' which makes you into a law breaker.

      • op00to 3 days ago

        Oh well. I also speed. Call the police.

  • bluGill 4 days ago

    On that note, does anyone have a copy of "The C programing language" (first edition) that isn't falling apart because the acid paper is decaying? I was referring to my copy the other day and it is clear the days I own that book are numbered because of planned obsolesce in the 1970s. I never bought the second edition, but if I did I'm sure it too would be falling apart from age before my likely death.

    • tartoran 4 days ago

      First edition may be collectible regardless of condition. And as well as newer editions it is resalable. Can you sell an used ebook you bought? How about can you buy an used ebook?

      • bluGill 4 days ago

        I don't have it because it is collectable. I have it because it is a great book and I still refer to it once in a while. (mostly I can find what I need on the web, but once in a while what K&R really said is important - though mostly for online arguments)

    • dokyun 4 days ago

      I got a lightly used copy off Amazon, along with "The UNIX programming environment" a year or two ago, probably. They're both fine with only a bit of wear, but I don't think they were ever of a super sturdy binding that would hold up well under heavy abuse.

      • bluGill 3 days ago

        The binding isn't great, but on my copy the pages themselves are getting brittle. In a few more years if I touch them they will fall to little pieces.

  • galleywest200 4 days ago

    It is trivially easy to remove DRM with a plugin for Calibre.

    • protonbob 4 days ago

      Not with the latest encryption. Although you can always screenshot and ocr. Or maybe I've missed something new.

      • EA-3167 4 days ago

        Unless latest means "In the last few months" then no it's still trivial. I buy a lot of "Kindle" books, but I always rip the DRM and make an ebook version I actually use and archive. My attitude is that once I pay for a song/game/book/etc... it's no one's business, but my own how I use it (for myself I mean, obviously uploading it to others is a different issue).

        • [removed] 4 days ago
          [deleted]
      • goosedragons 3 days ago

        For books from Amazon. Still trivial to remove DRM from Kobo, Google Play, any place that uses Adobe DRM.

    • NoboruWataya 4 days ago

      I think it's easier with some providers than others. I bought an Amazon ebook that I was really struggling to de-DRM (so I promptly returned it and have only bought books with Adobe DRM since).

    • seszett 3 days ago

      It's probably even easier to download them from Z-Library after having bought them on whatever legal platform.

      • nottorp 3 days ago

        Erm, i have a "friend" that has a few fancy signed physical hard covers that were never opened... because they took their sweet time to arrive so said "friend" downloaded the epub...

        Also back in the day when games came on discs, they used to download the no cd crack before opening the shrink wrapped box.

        • loughnane 3 days ago

          I think we have the same friend. He told me he likes to download a book to get a feel for it… like thumbing through a book in a bookshop. If it’s good, he goes ahead and buys it.

  • fullstop 4 days ago

    eBooks can be backed up and survive a house fire or a flood, though.

    • thih9 4 days ago

      Depends where the house fire or a flood is. If it's in a data center then they might suddenly disappear[1].

      [1]: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/ovhcloud-fire...

      • lowdownbutter 4 days ago

        If only we had more than one datacenter.

        • thih9 3 days ago

          > Many believed they had been paying for a reliable service with backups, and were shocked that their data was lost.

      • maksimur 4 days ago

        You can keep multiple copies in different locations.

        • thih9 3 days ago

          Exactly what the provider said.

          > Customers were not even compensated for lost data, unless they had paid for backups [which were also lost], with the company saying cloud customers should be handling their own disaster recovery plans.

    • dowager_dan99 4 days ago

      the challenge is I don't love my books for the content, but for their essence, so ebooks just aren't as valuable. If my physically books were destroyed in a fire I would be sad because i lost the objects, not temporarily lost access to the contents.

      • julian_t 3 days ago

        For me it's a bit of both. A programming book that I wrote over 10 years ago - the content is long out of date but the weight reminds me of the effort I put into producing it. Then there's my father's library, all 2000 books of it. I've kept about 50, on a wide variety of topics, and I value them both for the unusual content (Ancient churches of Wales; Jazz record catalogs from the 1940s; English artists from the early 20th century) and for the fact that they remind me of him.

      • krisoft 3 days ago

        > I don't love my books for the content, but for their essence

        Curious thing to say. For me it is obvious that the content is the book’s essence.

    • Aeolun 3 days ago

      You can buy an extra copy of the book too!

      • fullstop 3 days ago

        ... But you'll need a second house!

        • selcuka 3 days ago

          > ... But you'll need a second house!

          In another city... Multi-AZ deployment. Standard procedure.

zem 4 days ago

I'm kind of the opposite, I can't bring myself to let go of my collection of paper books, or even to stop buying a new one every so often, but I do not like the physical experience of reading one nearly as much as I like the experience of reading on a phone or kindle. holding a book in one hand and turning a page with a click is a really wonderful way to read.

  • tsujamin 4 days ago

    The standard I arrived at is roughly "would I be sad if, in 15 years, I forgot about this book/piece of music?". If it's something that I enjoyed so much today that I'd be afraid to lose it amongst 10,000's of eBooks or songs on a streaming platform, I physically buy it.

    • snoman 3 days ago

      I like this. I do something similar; I ask myself “Am I buying this for the knowledge inside it, or the experience of it?”

      I buy the latter. Be it a comic book, photography book, or something else. Those are artistic experiences for me.

  • jhbadger 4 days ago

    Exactly. I've even gone to the trouble of getting ebooks of physical books that I have in some cases. I vastly prefer the size and weight of an e-reader as compared to most books, plus the ability to change the font size to something I can easier read as opposed to the small fonts often chosen by paper books to minimize pages.

OJFord 4 days ago

> I regret the decision having gone fully digital, which can only be a complement to physical books.

I've long thought the purchase of a book should be considered a licence: you pay a little more if you want a physical version too, but they're not separate things; the digital ebook comes free/is the basic way your licence can be exercised.

(Ideally licenced people would be allowed to order cheap replacements if they damaged the physical copy, but how would you stop fraudulent sale & continual replacement-ordering.)

personalityson 3 days ago

Have you ever noticed than even after using screens/computers/phones for 12 hours a day, they almost never appear in your dreams when you sleep?

  • wholinator2 3 days ago

    My phone has come up in some dreams. But it seems my dream world can't properly render it cause it's always blurry, but even when I'm doing something specific, it has never, not once, worked the way its supposed to. My dream phones always do about 1 action and then completely stop responding. Then i get confused because i had a specific task in mind that's slowly fading and all i know is this diffusing rectangle in my floating palm is disobeying me. The dream moves on

    • personalityson 3 days ago

      I have a recurring dream where I'm trying to type something on my phone, and it never comes out right, I delete and try again and again, can't hit the right buttons

  • _kb 3 days ago

    It's a security limit in the simulation to help prevent sandbox escape.

  • amonith 3 days ago

    There's a "threat simulation theory" that sort of explains it, but it's not 100% correct for everyone. TL;DR: in dreams your brain often seems to practice "threats"/stressful situations. E.g. you're more likely to dream about missing work, having exams, car breaking, running from someone, interacting with someone you care about etc. rather than doing something you're completely used to.

    • wholinator2 3 days ago

      I wonder if very small children dream about screens then don't understand. Like, if a poor small child got hit with the car commercial or the maze jump scare, would that get added to the threat list? I'm talking young enough that they can't tell you it's a screen. Do babies dream? What could they ever dream about? Is there a library of set concepts that we're all genetically made to fear, if so, how would that be represented in dreams? Gosh

      • amonith 3 days ago

        Honestly probably yes to all of those. Except for small children the dreams are probably also non-visual like in the case of blind people. They probably dream about "weird feelings" (chills, shivers, cold, heat etc) and smells and sounds and whatnot. The TST also assumes that some of the instincts are inherited from our ancestors (e.g. that uneasy feeling when you walk alone through the forest at night - because for thousands of years predators could kill you in that exact scenario) so a baby's brain might dream about those feelings too (probably without visuals, just chemically induced feeling of uneasyness).

        And back to the screen scenario: To the brain "excitement" is also "stressful" from a chemical PoV. So if you really really enjoyed some game (as a kid or whatnot) you probably dreamt about it too.

  • eliasson 3 days ago

    I have never thought about that!

    Even if the last thing going through my head before sleep is related to programming (which is quite often the case), I cannot remember having dreamed of computers, ever.

  • fsiefken 3 days ago

    that's interesting, i don't remember my dreams often but I do remember books and comics - I even distinctly remember being lucid, reading a really good comic - but not my screen work or apps. Perhaps my brain just cannot LLM them convincingly? Are there lucid dreamers that sit behind their dream computers? If so, what are they doing, and do the programs give coherent responses? Are people playing chess or solo card- en boardgames or with dream characters?

sitkack 4 days ago

I understand your pain, we all seem to make dichotomies where none should exist.

Getting rid of print books is not a prerequisite for carrying your entire library with you. Why not both meme.

Hopefully ebooks will get to the point where they offer a better experience than paper books. But my mind does not handle the information in nearly the same way when using ebooks. I find them wonderfully valuable and productive, but in the same deep introspective way. They are transactional, focused and very task directed.

  • watwut 4 days ago

    I ebooks better for reading already. Physical books advantage is that I can read inside them in bookstore - bookstores are much better for me when I looking for something new.

    But I prefer actual reading on the phone.

    • bluGill 4 days ago

      Are you reading, or are you studying? When reading my phone is great. When I want to study though I will want to take notes, compare tables on different pages and other such things that my phone doesn't work for.

      • watwut 4 days ago

        I actually prefer ebook for both - including for studying. If the book I want to study requires larger screen, I prefer notebook. I never wrote into books, if I am taking notes it is on paper and sometimes electronically (with keyboard).

        For comparing tables, I prefer laptop.

sandworm101 4 days ago

I have a library of work-related books (military). Most of the great ones have no digital alternative. Authors of rare or definitive works know to avoid digital formats. Last year I paid 200+ to get my hands on a newly printed book because i know it will still be relevant on my shelf in 10/20/30 years. After reading it once I may leave it on that shelf for years. One day i will need it again. I will know where to find it no matter what OS i will then be using.

Things like this cannot be bought digitally, nor would most readers want a digital copy. http://www.hisutton.com/pages/Book%20project.html

I cannot champion this guy enough. His website belongs jn the 90s (it needs the "www") but his skills in open source analysis and drawing are unmatched. (He draws in MS paint!)

http://www.hisutton.com/

https://youtu.be/PdKkR_lbLN0

globular-toast 4 days ago

I read all fiction on my Kobo these days. I used to collect paperbacks but they take up a lot of space, especially if you're getting through 20+ books a year. I basically hoard books on my Kobo so I never don't have another book to read.

I do remove the DRM, though. I still want to own books.

But paper is still by far the best format for textbooks. It's not even close.

vishnugupta 3 days ago

For similar reasons I went back to physical books.

To add an additional change I noticed. Before I used to be big on reading as much as possible, remember everything. I’d get anxious if I forgot some details.

But now that’s all gone. I’ve learned to slowdown. I enjoy the books more and don’t worry too much about finishing it or remembering everything. I’m now deliberate about building my library. If I forget something I don’t sweat, if it comes back it comes back.

It could also have to do with age and COVID induced reprioritisation; either way I’m more at peace with where I’m about reading. I don’t think I’ll go back to digits books.

And oh now my children and wife know what I’m reading and who knows some shared reading habits could develop.

loughnane 3 days ago

Same with me.

Another part is I didn’t like my kids seeing me staring at a screen all the time, especially when they were young enough to not get the distinction between eink and lcd.

What’s worse is id be reading all these books and they’d have no idea, even incidentally, what I was reading. Now we’ve probably got 500-600 books on the house and kids are always pulling out something to read.

I still get ebooks sometimes to search for something specific or to feel out a book. I still use my remarkable tablet for papers and things, but my personal library (filled with my personal notes that’ll last my life) is very precious to me.

ccppurcell 3 days ago

I got rid of all novels and pop science books. They are fine to read on a kindle and rarely re-read. My physical books are textbooks and reference books (dictionaries, atlases).

I am a mathematician and I used to get a ton of mileage out of Google for research. I got really good at working out likely phrases other researchers would use for concepts that I encountered, and using Boolean operators to filter out pages with similar keywords. I think those days are over sadly. I think we will see a resurgence of personal libraries.

2OEH8eoCRo0 4 days ago

Physical has a spatial dimension that digital cannot replicate. Like I can't tell ya what page something is on but I can find it quickly by feel.

Something is lost by moving to digital but what? By what metric?

  • w00ds 4 days ago

    Exactly that which is not amenable to metrics...

jjice 4 days ago

I love a paper back, but man did I fall in love with ebooks in the last year and a half. I own a Kindle and a Kobo and it's just so incredible for traveling (instead of carrying two books in my backpack) and in bed (the screen backlights are just fantastic).

I absolutely buy certain books physical still, if they're of a certain quality or meaning to me. If Martin Fowler released a new book tomorrow, I'd get it physical. Hell, I might even buy a physical and digital copy.

That said, digital is now my default way to read a book.

Cthulhu_ 3 days ago

I have some books from my childhood still, and while I'm not really interested in reading them, my parents and others that gave them to me as gifts made sure to write a note of sorts in the cover. It's a great idea, if you give books as gifts. Make sure it's written in the book itself, not a separate (loseable) postcard or something. Add a date and the occasion.

mistahchris 4 days ago

I did the exact same thing. I'm back to buying real books, but I will say I still use my ereader in situations without good lighting or where the book is just too cumbersome. Sometimes that means I get the book twice which is suboptimal, but I strongly prefer the reading experience of a physical book. My appreciation of the work is even higher when the reading experience is better.

dghughes 3 days ago

I agree physical books are great since you can hold them, smell them - nothing like an ebook. There is also a big advantage for us middle-aged folks that ebooks have and that's adjustable font size. Bifocal glasses help bit making font bigger is better.

p00dles 3 days ago

I like to rent/buy eBooks for the first-time read, and if I like the book, buy the physical version.

Few things are more satisfying to me being able to hand a book off of my shelf to a friend when I think that they would like it, and having them report back they read and liked the book.

darknavi 4 days ago

I really enjoy audio books much more than reading (perhaps it helps me feed my need to "consume", as I can listen to them while doing other, menial things) but I also enjoy buying the same titles and filling out a physical book shelf.

I love the visual appraisal of a library a lot more in person than on a screen.

  • dowager_dan99 4 days ago

    I never got hooked on audio books, even back in the "on tape" days. So slow and I have trouble visualizing and immersing myself in them.

    • darknavi 4 days ago

      The narrator absolutely makes or breaks a book. I find my self more often following narrators versus following authors, which is crazy to say.

      If you want to give a narrator a shot, Ray Porter is super solid. Lots of cool sci-fi books out there that he narrates.

myko 4 days ago

I went this route as well, and I've now repopulated many of my favorite books from my youth in physical editions. I wish more physical books were like Goodman Games where any purchase includes a digital download code.

Regretfully, I still prefer generally reading on my Kindle, so I end up buying two copies of the book.

dbtc 3 days ago

I can relate! A well-bound book is such a perfectly designed thing. A few books on my shelf were printed over 100 years ago, they have a very special weight to them.

Ebooks are also a miracle; a literal library on a microsd is mind-bogglingly amazing.

If I had to choose... I would choose both.

dowager_dan99 4 days ago

I just love the experience of reading a paper book, especially in trade paperback - which is weird because it's not a great format, but something about the dimensions (as long as the book isn't too long), and the cover and the feel and the paper...

tikkabhuna 4 days ago

I'd love to have bundles where you can get the physical and ebook at the same time. Going on holiday it is ideal to have an ebook reader to carry many books, but, like you say, there is something precious about having books lined up on shelves to see them.

[removed] 3 days ago
[deleted]
coffeebeqn 3 days ago

It’s also a great practice if you actually wish to own the things you purchase. Same with things like music, movies, games. If it’s just on a cloud platform it will disappear one day.

brtkdotse 4 days ago

> Now I have my whole library in Calibre and on my Kindle.

Funnily enough I’m contemplating buying a MiniDisc player since my music listening has gone way down since Spotify came along.

Its like the abdunance of selection is overwhelming.

  • fsiefken 3 days ago

    Yes, I have the same. Why not a simple mp3 player or a portable cd player?

bowsamic 4 days ago

The real question is why did you feel the need to be so extreme? Why couldn't you just do a little digital rather than fully? I don't understand this all or nothing stuff. Live moderately

eleveriven 3 days ago

I personally form the sensory and emotional connection with printed books! Holding a book, feeling its weight, and flipping through its pages...

fullstop 4 days ago

My wife donated all of her CDs and subsequently started buying the same albums on iTunes. I still don't know why.

  • DaiPlusPlus 4 days ago

    Was this recently (say, after 2014?) Try finding a computer with an optical drive today. You need to get an external USB device today, modern cases don’t have external 5-inch bays.

    Another problem is all the music apps and services that we’re supposed to use according to the music industry are streaming services: Spotify doesn’t have a CD-player feature; it wouldn’t surprise me if today’s new-computer-user had no idea that CD-ripping was even possible.

    • fullstop 4 days ago

      It was before 2014 and we still had ways of either playing optical content or ripping the media and storing it ourselves.

  • torcete 4 days ago

    I just recently discovered navidrome https://www.navidrome.org

    I converted all my old CDs to ogg and installed navidrome on my home server. Basically, now I have my own personal spotify.

    I am aware though that this solution won't work for everybody.

    • fullstop 4 days ago

      Too late, the library has all of the discs now. :-)

      She could borrow them all back, one at a time, and re-build the library.

      • torcete 3 days ago

        I think it's a brilliant plan! Your wife transfered the cost of ownership to the library :-D

  • nytesky 4 days ago

    That bothers me less, as finding a device to play CD music is very hard and expensive now.

    Also the CDs will degrade in another decade to worthlessness, unlike books

    • GuestFAUniverse 4 days ago

      I have a whole drawer full of barely used cdrom drives from decommissioned office PCs to play my audio discs, in case my Philips Player from 1995 is worn down -- didn't even need a repair yet, so no real worries... Additionally the CDs get backuped as FLACs.

      I don't see what's "hard" with that approach. Most new releases still get presses as CDs.

    • bluGill 4 days ago

      Pressed CDs - which most of them are (pressing is much cheaper in quantity) will generally last well. Record able CDs (like you buy from the individual artist won't last much longer.

      Either way though I have long since ripped my CDs to my NAS system. I keep the CDs in storage so if someone says copyright I can prove fair use as I still own the media.

gunian 3 days ago

what do you feel about the inability to move easily with a large library? ebooks + printer seems like a nice compromise

but kind of moot if you are settled in life are not a desperado nomad of sorts

Al-Khwarizmi 4 days ago

I'm an avid reader. But about maybe 15 years ago, I stopped buying printed books because I felt guilty - they took up too much space, and it was running scarce. And surely ebooks were superior - no space wasted, I could take an entire library with me, etc. It was just a matter of getting used to them, and abandoning the impractical romanticism of fetishizing the printed page.

At that time, I pretty much stopped reading. Now it's obvious why that happened, but at that point I didn't really connect the dots. I thought that I ran into a bad streak of books that just didn't hook me much, and then I was very busy, I always seemed to have something else to do rather than continue reading. So for those hypothetical reasons I went from reading several books per month to one per year, or even less.

At some point, I read a printed book and it hooked me like in the old times. And then, it dawned on me that the books being bad, or me being busy, were just excuses. The real reason is that I didn't like electronic reading. I wasn't proud of this. It wasn't a rational attitude. Electronic reading was clearly superior (less space, more flexibility and so on), and the content was exactly the same. I was actually quite ashamed of myself: was I such a shallow person that I didn't appreciate the contents of the literature enough to abstract away from purely materialistic concerns? What kind of person can't appreciate culture or art just because they don't like the medium used to transmit it? But be that as it may, the plain truth was that ebooks didn't hook me, and physical books did, so I admitted it and started buying printed books again. And once again, I'm an avid reader.

In the last few years, papers and studies have started to appear saying that with paper reading we retain more, we concentrate more, we learn more, etc... so I have started to reconcile with myself. Maybe I'm not a shallow materialistic asshole after all, and it's just human nature.

  • the_af 3 days ago

    It's weird, but I find myself abandoning ebooks much easier than printed books. It's actually very rare that I abandon a printed book, but very common that I put off finishing an ebook.

    I wonder why. What you say rings true.

    As silly as it sounds, my emotional connection to ebooks is somehow weaker.

fcsp 4 days ago

I'm jojoing on this for at least 15 years at this point. I really appreciate the physical experience of real books, the smell, the weight, just as you describe it. At the same time I really despise the storage space they take up, collecting dust, never to be touched again. So I go full digital for a while and read books on my Scribe. I get decision paralysis really quickly because of all the content available at a finger press, but the note taking and accessibility of it all are really nice. But after a while I grow tired of this and buy some hardcover books again and really enjoy that.

This cycle has been repeating for me for a long time, I wonder if I'll find a good balance eventually. My current approach is to try and read more technical stuff digital while keeping novels, the humanities, history as paperback, we'll see.

deegles 3 days ago

you could learn bookbinding and print out your annotated books. i feel like it would be a nice hobby.