Comment by lenerdenator

Comment by lenerdenator a year ago

49 replies

> 2. The govt is mad that they have control over the narrative on Facebook but do not on TikTok

If the last four years are indicative of anything, it's that the US government has fairly limited control over the narrative on American social platforms.

I lost count of how many times I saw people typing in "FJB" and "MAGA".

ok123456 a year ago

"FJB" and "MAGA" are within the bounds of allowed political discourse and were encouraged.

"Throw the bums out" without any additional coherent political project is precisely what the elites allow and what allows them to maintain power.

  • lenerdenator a year ago

    I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that the JB was Joe Biden and he was quite literally President of the United States when that was a trend, sure.

    Same with MAGA after January 6th.

    • ok123456 a year ago

      Why would you have to "ignore" those facts?

      It was a concerted effort to channel quiescently conservative voters into national electoral politics.

      Neither of those challenged the super-structure.

kristopolous a year ago

Or, maybe, those things they don't see as a problem.

These shifty foreigners, however... Xenophobia isn't just some old timey things we use to do

spencerflem a year ago

Facebook is extremely censored re: the genocide in Gaza

TikTok is not

  • lenerdenator a year ago

    Is it censored, or do most people just not talk about it on Facebook?

    It's interesting how incredibly supportive of human rights that a platform in bed with the CCP became, no? Do you think that China's human rights bugaboos are often discussed on their internal social networks?

    It's amplified.

    • spencerflem a year ago

      No, I do not think China's bugaboos are allowed on TikTok for the exact same reason the US's are not allowed on Facebook

      • lenerdenator a year ago

        I mean, I've seen plenty of dissenting material against the powers-that-be on Meta platforms over the years, but okay.

        Police brutality (both viewpoints), COVID conspiracies, election conspiracies, etc. are not particularly hard to find on there.

    • 93po a year ago

      there's a billion people on facebook, i am sure people talk about it

      • lenerdenator a year ago

        It's possible, but ultimately it's hard to tell, especially in regard to the American users.

        The results of the election would point to the idea that most American voters aren't so perturbed by what's happening in Gaza as to want an administration that would be at least as effective in reeling in the Israelis as the Biden administration was. Whether that's right or wrong, well, that's another discussion.

        It's a chicken-or-the-egg problem. Do people not talk about Gaza on Facebook because it's censored, or do people not talk about Gaza on Facebook because no one was talking about it to begin with?

  • throwawaymaths a year ago

    tiktok is extremely censored re: genocide in xinjiang. facebook is not.

    • segasaturn a year ago

      Great, so we have TikTok where we can access information that's being censored by the West, and Facebook to access information that's being censored by the East. What's the problem? Information wants to be free.

    • spencerflem a year ago

      Not disagreeing, that's exactly my point, the govt wants to be able control the narrative

    • squarefoot a year ago

      There are places in the west where you risk losing your job just by mentioning the ongoing genocide that is happening now in Gaza. I'm not defending the CCP in any way, it's just that power corrupts and abuse of power happens pretty much everywhere.

    • whimsicalism a year ago

      i feel that we overuse the word genocide nowadays, in a way that almost amounts to holocaust trivialization

      • spencerflem a year ago

        if this is referring to Gaza, many Holocaust experts are willing to call what's happening there a genocide

      • NoGravitas a year ago

        Yep. The Chinese state is guilty of a number of things in Xinjiang, but genocide is not one of them.

        • throwawaymaths a year ago

          fair. they are guilty of arresting specific ethnicity for the crime of gathering in groups, and targetting men and forbidding men to have children, and forcing women to take han husbands to dilute their ethnicity. but not genocide.

  • strathmeyer a year ago

    Trump won, the Russian misinformation campaign is over now. You can stop making stuff up about Jews now.