miki_oomiri a year ago

90% of 2010’s Mozilla employees are gone. Most core employees are gone. Most Firefox-era developers are gone.

Most PM and directors were brought in after firefox got big.

They can’t even find a CEO.

The people who made Mozilla great are now working somewhere else.

  • kleranc a year ago

    Yes, this is another example how foundation directors and CEOs profit from OSS while ruining the organization.

    One wonders if that is the overarching strategy of those who fund OSS.

  • matheusmoreira a year ago

    That's incredibly sad. I wish those people had forked Firefox and created their own company to rival Mozilla. I would have switched.

    • alternatex a year ago

      There is Zen browser, which is a fork of Firefox. Though no idea who's developing it.

      • tumsfestival a year ago

        A bunch of randos, which doesn't really inspire much confidence.

    • drak0n1c a year ago

      One did. Brave browser.

      • fyrn_ a year ago

        Isn't brave just a chromium flavor?

Alupis a year ago

That is the problem that got them into this situation in the first place.

No consistent leadership vision or direction - do everything and anything their staff wanted, almost none of which was actual tech. They hired activists - not technologists.

Look at the results.

  • Qwertious a year ago

    >No consistent leadership vision or direction

    On the other hand, random side-projects are necessary for finding new ground before it craters you - like how Microsoft was absolutely cratered by the "smartphone" thing and their too-little-too-late Windows Phone.

    • int_19h a year ago

      Microsoft didn't need a side project to figure that out, though. Hell, WinMo was already one of the two major smartphone/PDA OSes long before iPhone was a thing.

  • Loughla a year ago

    What are the results? I can't seem to Google that and get anything meaningful.

    • Alupis a year ago

      You can google Firefox market share, Thunderbird market share, Mozilla's financial standing over the past two decades, all of their failed social justice endeavors, etc.

      The company rotted from the inside by allowing the inmates to run the asylum. Now Mozilla is severing the limb responsible for endless side-quests - but probably way too late.

      FTA: "Fighting for a free and open internet will always be core to our mission, and advocacy continues to be a critical tool in that work. We’re revisiting how we pursue that work, not stopping it"

      How about you just make the best damn web browser imaginable?

      One of the most important and influential technology companies ever ate itself into a failed advocacy group with a couple mediocre tech hobbies. What a joke...

      • cxr a year ago

        Your diagnosis is off. So many of the good workers got poached by Facebook and all the other companies that HNers dream of working for. Not all of them ever even worked for Mozilla Foundation or its subsidiaries—some simply got reassigned by the company that was actually paying them. Pre-Chrome, for example, the Firefox lead was a Google employee.

        And not that it's the product of any of the people who were let go, but developer.mozilla.org is a pretty valuable and high-impact resource. It's more "advocacy for a free and open Internet" than it is "making a browser".

      • tcfhgj a year ago

        > How about you just make the best damn web browser imaginable?

        Difficult if you compete directly with your main money source

        • emmelaich a year ago

          But that's their reason for being. So they have to try.

_HMCB_ a year ago

I’ve been following them for over 20 years. Mozilla’s problem is idealism. One project to the next. At the end day, you have to pay your bills.

  • Alupis a year ago

    They seemingly spent the last 20 years actively figuring out ways not to make money. It's a terrible shame. They coast on the memories of yesteryear - a shell of their former selves.

    • naasking a year ago

      They did create some things of lasting value though, like Rust.

      • lolinder a year ago

        And then proceeded to lay off the Rust team and force it out on its own. That probably worked out for the best in the end, but they don't get to claim credit for Rust's subsequent successes.

      • Alupis a year ago

        Another missed opportunity in my opinion.

        Why do I use a Microsoft product to develop in Rust? Mozilla could have built the best-in-class Rust developer experience, a la Jetbrains.

        Just another mismanaged, incoherent side quest.

    • [removed] a year ago
      [deleted]
cxr a year ago

This presupposes that decisions made by the collective would be better than the direction the execs have given. They won't. It will be just as ineffectual as the Mozilla we've known for the last 10 years.