Comment by vgeek

Comment by vgeek 10 months ago

108 replies

View on Hacker News

The same thing happens every 3-5 years. HowStuffWorks, About.com (now like 10 different domains), many IAC acquired properties, RedVenture sites, even random sites like LiveStrong.com will be wildly prominent when the domains historically aren't relevant or authoritative for a given niche.

Even recently, sites like CNN were using subdomains with affiliate offers managed by third parties(1). These sites weren't being de-ranked algorithmically-- someone at Google would have to apply a manual action to remove them from the SERPs. What incentive would there be to do so if a prior agreement was in place?

Google doesn't really care about discoverability for smaller domains that may have good content. They are either being risk averse (avoiding potential spammers, junk AI content) by favoring trusted domains, favoring brands who are likely to spend on display or search ads, or maybe a combination of these.

1) https://searchengineland.com/google-begins-enforcement-of-si...

Animats 10 months ago

It's really frustrating. I currently want to buy a mattress and a refrigerator. The results for those are so awful as to be useless.

Reply View 94 replies
  • supportengineer 10 months ago

    A lot of classic software essentially worked more like a database. In the last 10-15 years it's all moving to an algorithm.

    Here is what I mean. Photos apps used to let you search through your photos using filters.

    The same kinds of things are happening on the web which already happened to apps (desktop and mobile).

    In the modern world, some marketing company wants to tell YOU which of YOUR photos you wanted, so they can sell you some prints, harvest your data, or something.

    I would like any apps that have to do with collections of files, photos, music, etc to be more of a deterministic DATABASE and less of a nondeterministic algorithm.

    Reply View 28 replies
    • wolpoli 10 months ago

      > A lot of classic software essentially worked more like a database. In the last 10-15 years it's all moving to an algorithm.

      You just described what I missed about the older software. Older software gives users control over sorting and show data in a tabular format. Modern software sorts data with an algorithm, with ads mixed in, and shows data in a card format, making it a lot less usable.

      Reply View 16 replies
      • TeMPOraL 10 months ago

        Exactly. My related observation: half of the SaaS products I see would be more useful and ergonomic for the user if they were implemented as an Excel sheet.

        (I actually worked for one of such "better off as an .xls file" startup in the past, and its main competitor was an incumbent that sold the same stuff as an Excel extension. Trying to replace that with a React app is not a worthwhile use of life.)

        Algorithms are fine. I'll happily apply the most advanced ones I can get. The problem is with who applies them to what - as you and GP said, it's about user control - or, currently, lack of.

        Reply View 3 replies
      • brookst 10 months ago

        > Older software gives users control over sorting and show data in a tabular format

        I'm old and tend to agree, but I suspect this is similar to "you used to have a knob on the TV that showed the channel it's on".

        Reply View 11 replies
    • grugagag 10 months ago

      Deterministic software puts the user in control of the product. Nondeterministic algos put the products in control of the user. Naturally companies want the latter and under guises of the ‘now better’ give the user worse and charge them more. A new generation isn’t even aware they’re being fleeced because they don’t have anything to compare with. And the frog boils slowly…

      Reply View 6 replies
      • knowaveragejoe 10 months ago

        This entire thread reads like multiple people circling around product opportunities. There are users out there who want control and will pay for something no-frills. You might not get big VC money to build this, but you could build this.

        Reply View 5 replies
    • Ekaros 10 months ago

      Reminds of Windows and search. I am not anymore even sure if there is some nice dialog where I could put some pattern and folder or list of folder and have it run through it for me...

      Reply View 3 replies
      • ncpa-cpl 10 months ago

        > nice dialog where I could put some pattern and folder or list of folder and have it run through it for me

        Everything from Voidtools is a dialog window, accepts patterns and is really fast.

        https://www.voidtools.com/

        Reply View 1 reply
        • _DeadFred_ 10 months ago

          And Stardock's Start11 adds EveryThing's search to your start menu.

          Reply View 0 replies
      • zeagle 10 months ago

        It's just enshitification. It's pretty funny when I search for putty and get the help doc, or my email client and get some windows setting option. I switched to powertoys search to get around it but wonder if anyone responsible for maintaining this feature actually uses it.

        Reply View 0 replies
  • devjab 10 months ago

    I got so frustrated trying to find some shelves recently that I ended up building them myself. It used to be that I could use Google to find some furniture stores, but now they all require me to throughly vet them to make sure they aren’t just reselling stuff from China or scam sites. Ikea still works, but that’s about it unless I go to big designer brands where a shelf will cost me a gazillion DKR. Unfortunately Ikea didn’t have any shelves that I liked, which is why I build them out of some wood I purchased in the local hardware store.

    It’s so annoying that it’s almost impossible to find a legitimate store. Well maybe that’s not the correct way to word it. It’s so frustrating that it’s almost impossible to know whether or not the top shops you get in your search results are stores you want to use or not.

    Reply View 7 replies
    • PaulHoule 10 months ago

      It's bad enough that manufacturers in China might start complaining about it as the best manufacturers there have a reputation to protect.

      There is a mushroom grower in Shanghai, for instance, which grows very inexpensive but tasty beech mushrooms in a giant vertical farm where workers only touch the mushrooms with a forklift (see https://www.finc-sh.com/en/about.aspx#fincvideo)

      There are numerous photography equipment vendors in China that make innovative and value-conscious products (like this inexpensive manual focus lens which takes pictures like you've never seen: https://7artisans.store/products/50mm-f1-05) that excel in customer support. They post real manuals to their web sites where you can easily find them, they correspond to you with email and not a ticket system behind a CAPTCHA, they don't have a huge list of unauthorized vendors for whom they won't support your product if you bought from them, etc. I hear back from them in 24 hours most of the time compared to an Italian vendor that makes great tripods but takes more like four days to respond.

      If Chinese vendors are working that hard to get my business I very much want to support them.

      Reply View 2 replies
      • Kye 10 months ago

        I borrowed a Laowa 100mm macro lens (Venus Optics) for a little while. The only reason I didn't buy one is it disabled TTL since it lacked the required electronics.

        https://www.venuslens.net/product/laowa-100mm-f-2-8-2x-macro...

        There are also several Chinese graphics tablet companies that Wacom still doesn't realize it's in competition with.

        Reply View 1 reply
        • PaulHoule 10 months ago

          It depends what kind of shooting you are doing. I depend on autofocus for a lot of the work I do (sports) but I have more fun shooting with my manual 7Artisans lens with the aperture ring than I do with a Zeiss 55mm/1.4. The 7Artisans lens has weaknesses that show up when you try astrophotography with it (definitely some light goes the wrong way and bright stars turn into weird shapes) but it also takes great shots like

          https://mastodon.social/@UP8/111077882869934997

          (freakin’ at night!) I bought this ring flash

          https://godox.com/product-d/MF-R76.html

          which requires manual metering to save more than $100 off one which has TTL metering as I am using it for studio work where I am going to set it up once and take 20 shots.

          Reply View 0 replies
    • sirsinsalot 10 months ago

      I was looking for a product recently. I wanted to buy from a UK business.

      I found countless Web stores pretending to be UK businesses complete with founder stories and convincing copy... All turning out to be Chinese fronts.

      They know the tide is against them and see starting to employ some shady tactics to get sales.

      At the same time the big money in China is buying westernised historic brands to trade through.

      I'm not anti-China for goods and services, but I am against the deceptive practices I've been seeing.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • darth_avocado 10 months ago

      > they aren’t just reselling stuff from China

      At this point everything you buy is from China in some way or the other. From iPhones to Nikes, from your electronic batteries to garlic. At this point stuff from China isn’t exactly a bad thing, considering how poorly things made elsewhere are doing. I have had so many issues with American made things that I almost prefer items made elsewhere. From cars to refrigerators.

      Reply View 2 replies
      • devjab 10 months ago

        I don’t mind products from China as long as they live up to EU regulations. If they are resold from places like Temu and similar then they’ve been found to be out right dangerous in some cases and in most they don’t live up to any of our safety standards. This isn’t an issue with “normal” stores which do their due diligence in their supply chain. Yes, it sometimes goes wrong, but it doesn’t happen often and when it does they inform you and recall products.

        I can’t tell the authentic stores with legitimate quality control apart from the ones which will shut down and reopen with a new name next month.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • [removed] 10 months ago
        [deleted]
        Reply View 0 replies
  • ghaff 10 months ago

    Mattresses have been especially bad for a long time. For refrigerators, you can look at consumer reports and wirecutter--and you can reasonably do some evaluation at your local big box appliance store. I wouldn't buy based on a random web search though.

    Reply View 34 replies
    • Animats 10 months ago

      > Mattresses have been especially bad for a long time.

      Yes. Refrigerators, at least, are made by a relatively small number of companies with established brands. They have EnergyStar ratings, and there's some objective evaluation.

      For mattresses, the whole industry is a scam. Mattresses actually cost about US$50 to US$80 in bulk. Search Alibaba. Almost all consumer-facing companies are resellers. Markups are huge. Essentially all the mattress review sites are paid promotions.

      Reply View 6 replies
      • dghlsakjg 10 months ago

        I imagine that the logistics of moving a bunch of stupidly large items is also part of the markup.

        Sure, I can buy a mattress from a factory in China, but getting it to my door is a whole other thing.

        Last time I bought a mattress, admittedly, an overpriced one. I got to test out a sample at the store, and then a truck with two guys showed up, put on special booties to keep my house clean, carted away the old mattress, placed the new one, etc. I even took advantage of their 90 day guarantee to swap to a slightly less firm mattress, and the whole process was repeated for no cost.

        Hiring a truck and two men to deliver a large item, and then haul another large item to the dump, and then pay the dump fee for a mattress (a lot more than standard dump fees), is something that would cost a few hundred dollars otherwise.

        I'm sure that they made a profit off of me, but I have my doubts that there are riches to be made in the mattress industry given that there seems to be VERY low barriers to entry.

        Reply View 1 reply
        • ghaff 10 months ago

          Yeah, even if there are often explicit delivery/disposal/installation charges, large deliveries are often not just a matter of shipping something to your door sight unseen and no reasonable recourse if you're not happy.

          Reply View 0 replies
      • mschuster91 10 months ago

        > For mattresses, the whole industry is a scam.

        Pillows as well. Mike Lindell (the My Pillows guy who sank himself with "election manipulation claims") didn't get his fortune from nothing. The markup is insane there as well... if you want decent pillows go to Ikea.

        Reply View 3 replies
    • groby_b 10 months ago

      Wirecutter's gone downhill after the NYT purchase as well. The Spruce seems somewhat better (but is also part of a huge web site family, so caveat emptor)

      Either you do deep research, or you find a trusted friend to advise you. The Internet is largely useless at this point.

      Reply View 11 replies
      • ghaff 10 months ago

        I think Wirecutter is still a decent source; they probably won't steer you too far wrong if you're not too picky. But nothing, including your trusted friends, is an all-knowing oracle if only because their tastes and priorities are probably different from yours. Certainly pre-Internet there were few enough reliable sources of recommendations--maybe some specialist magazines but even those were far from perfect.

        Reply View 5 replies
      • sheepolog 10 months ago

        > or you find a trusted friend to advise you

        I think there's an opportunity here for a review platform that only shows you reviews from individuals that you personally trust. "Find a trusted friend" but for the internet.

        Reply View 4 replies
    • frontiersummit 10 months ago

      It has always felt to me that Wirecutter focuses on only one end of the Pareto curve ("what is the very best XXXX that money can buy, within reason") and ignores the middle of the curve where most people are actually shopping ("what is the best XXXX that I can get for $XXX"). It also seems to reliably ignore brands from Mainland China (Hisense, Midea, etc). I guess It makes obvious sense to court rich (or at least price-insensitive) readers.

      Reply View 8 replies
      • ghaff 10 months ago

        Whether or not it started that way, yes, it makes sense to recommend brands that New York Times subscribers are familiar and comfortable with. I'll buy a GE Profile refrigerator or Bosch dishwasher. Not some Chinese brand I've never heard of and have no idea what the service situation will be with. Makes perfect sense to me and I'm in that demographic. Especially with major appliances and things I can buy at the local big box store seems to make perfect sense to not buy things you have to go to Alibaba to obtain.

        It's not about being price insensitive but recommending things that are relatively mainstream and that don't seem risky, especially for major purchases that have to be installed and potentially serviced.

        (Did have a service issue on my recent GE Profile refrigerator but it took one phone call and was a no-brainer.)

        But you're probably right in general. Wirecutter mostly doesn't recommend unknowns it thinks are potentially bargains. Which I probably wouldn't do in its position either.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • crazygringo 10 months ago

        That's not true at all.

        They usually have a midrange "top pick", followed by a "budget pick" and an "upgrade pick".

        It's not "the best money can buy" at all -- that's what they reserve their "upgrade pick" for. E.g. look at humidifiers:

        https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/the-best-humidifi...

        Also it's full of Chinese brands. The top two humidifiers are Levoit, from Shenzen. Or if I look at dehumidifiers, Midea is their #1 pick:

        https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-dehumidifier...

        So I don't think anything you said is true. Maybe for some individual products, but certainly not for the site as a whole.

        Reply View 3 replies
      • dghlsakjg 10 months ago

        Check out Tech Gear Lab. (I have met the owner)

        They are a great review site, and normally do categories like "absolute best", "best value", and "best budget".

        They are very thorough, and always buy their own stuff, never take sponsorships or freebies.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • datavirtue 10 months ago

      It's easy, browse to GE on big box hardware website. Select the model you want. Avoid everything else.

      Reply View 2 replies
      • jameshart 10 months ago

        One problem with this kind of strategy is that brands often become enshrined when you aren’t looking. While the last time I was looking for kitchen appliances GE was pretty good, how do I know that in the past few years they haven’t been bought out by a private equity firm and started having their brand slapped on random low quality products?

        Reply View 0 replies
      • ghaff 10 months ago

        I might add a couple other brands but, yeah, you probably won't go too wrong.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • murukesh_s 10 months ago

      if there is a trial period better get cheapest and highly reviewed mattress. Even if it's a scam you get to know it within x days and can return it.

      I try to buy natural materials like latex or cotton - which cannot and are not mass produced (difficult to roll and transport from across the world)

      Reply View 0 replies
    • Supermancho 10 months ago

      Saatva mattresses raised the bar. They are amazing.

      Reply View 1 reply
  • froglets 10 months ago

    If I want to buy something like that I set an alert on slickdeals.net Like everything else it used to be better years ago, but there are still some genuine great deals and lots of insight if you’re willing to sift through the comments.

    When I was looking for a fridge a year or so ago I heard that Samsung was trying to fix their bad appliance rep and quality of parts had gone up, but I went with a different brand.

    There’s been an issue the last few years of fiberglass escaping through the cover on memory foam mattresses. If I was mattress shopping I’d probably still get foam, but look for one without fiberglass or find some kind of allergy cover to at least contain it.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • lotsofpulp 10 months ago

    The only signal I use is warranty. So I tend to go to Costco, and avoid Samsung.

    Reply View 4 replies
    • hansvm 10 months ago

      It's not a bad idea to pair that with lawsuits related to such warranties.

      Costco and Samsung are big enough that you can achieve reasonable signal.

      When your local car dealer offers you a full drivetrain warranty though (assuming it's a full warranty and not one of the other ways people are often fleeced), will they honor it when the lemon they sold you breaks the first time? the 2nd? the 3rd? Will they, instead, note that most people buying that car don't have much money (or, if you used any form of dealer financing, know for a fact you don't have much money) and require you to retain a lawyer and sue them to recover any damages?

      Reply View 2 replies
      • mdorazio 10 months ago

        Not sure if your car example was meant to be general or specific, but Lemon Laws are extremely common across the states and are very easy to take advantage of without needing to retain a lawyer. For example, in Texas you fill out a form, pay a $35 filing fee, then bring your evidence to mediation.

        Reply View 1 reply
        • hansvm 10 months ago

          It's a bit of both. Generally the idea holds. The example isn't that bad either. O(100k-1M) people have dealer-fraud related problems every year in the US, usually without happy outcomes. A few ways this might happen relating to my use of the word "lemon" include:

          1. Colloquial use of "lemon" differs from the legal definition. In the given example, this might include a 15yr old vehicle (far outside any normal "manufacturer's" warranty) with numerous defects both known to the dealer and lied about to the consumer. The dealer would likely lose any civil complaint, but in Texas, and most states, this doesn't count as a "lemon." You're protected, if at all, by the fact that the salesperson warranted a thing, and perhaps any actual written "warranty" (really insurance, not that it necessarily matters) the dealer might have sold you. You usually waive the warrant of merchantability, so the fact that the car is a dud isn't enough by itself for you to have any damages (all state-specific, consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction).

          2. Picking on Texas, since you brought it up, if you only bring the car in 3 times for a major defect covered under the lemon law, it's not a lemon yet. If the dealer refuses to deal with you on the 3rd instance then you'll have to sue with some other justification.

          3. In the vast majority of states, you don't have an automated (minus filing fees) hearing process pertaining to lemons. Even in those which do, you're much more likely to succeed with the help of an attorney. In either case, in most states, attorney's fees are not part of the damages you can claim, and when squabbling about a $5k used car it can easily cost more in attorney fees (plus incidentals like renting a car and missing work for the actual hearings -- usually not covered even in states granting damages for incidentals (including rentals and missing work in other contexts) arising from the lemon), often making it not even worth pursuing.

          ...

          Usually, even with moderate legal protections, you don't want to enter into an agreement where you expect to have to rely on those protections. Your best-case scenario is that you waste a bunch of time and still have only as many resources as you started with. You'll usually do even worse. Why take a losing gamble?

          Reply View 0 replies
    • tacocataco 10 months ago

      Samsung appliances are awful. I'd rather do my own dishes or put my food in a cooler.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • Hnrobert42 10 months ago

    I got a mattress last year using Consumer Reports rec for most the mattress with the least synthetic chemicals. I am not going to say its name lest it look like I am shilling for them. I will say, it has been great.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • Larrikin 10 months ago

      If it's in a verifiable external source (Consumer Report for instance, not some lady's Amazon affiliate links blog), then I would say it's never shilling.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • brendoelfrendo 10 months ago

    Having bought a mattress recently, it might be worth going to a mattress store. The sales process sucks, but if you want to find a mattress you like, it's hard to beat actually laying down on one.

    Reply View 4 replies
    • Loughla 10 months ago

      It also can help you identify the kind you like (coil, latex, etc) and composition you like (layer style and thickness).

      Then you just search for those two things online.

      That's how I found an amazing natural latex cooling mattress online.

      And the best part is that most online mattress retailers have 90 day try out periods. We didn't like our first one, and instead of having us ship it back they told us to donate it and sent us the next to try. So now we have a really nice spare bedroom mattress as well as the perfect mattress in our bedroom.

      Reply View 3 replies
      • underlipton 10 months ago

        This is common. Most online retailers don't have the means to recover and remediate used mattresses (if it's even legal). Most are essentially just branded drop-shipping companies hocking products manufactured in Asia (often from the same factories, with minor differences between "models"). If you have the money to purchase the mattress initially, then you can just keep doing 90-day trials until you get one that the seller asks you to dispose of yourself when you try to return it. Bam, free mattress. Manufacturers and retailers can afford to do this because the markup on materials+labor+shipping is insane.

        I'm surprised that people haven't caught on yet. Maybe something to do with the nature of the purchase. In a better world, even a "luxury" mattress would cost a couple hundred bucks, at most, but then be extremely difficult to return.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • jihadjihad 10 months ago

        I like how you donated it to the spare bedroom lol

        Reply View 1 reply
        • Loughla 10 months ago

          In my defense, we did call multiple agencies that work with low-income folks on finding housing and household goods. Due to the possibility of bedbugs, none of them are taking bedding or mattresses anymore.

          Reply View 0 replies
  • boringg 10 months ago

    I want to add in case people think this is strictly a Google thing. DDG is equally terrible at finding this kind of thing. I didn't realize until I read this thread that I was suffering this same kind of issue. Its so painful trying to find on the internet.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • klyrs 10 months ago

      Is DDG not just a whitelabel Bing?

      Reply View 1 reply
  • pembrook 10 months ago

    It’s the same for pretty much any product category now. Affiliate marketing and Google using its monopoly to prioritize ads over search results has basically ruined search. It’s in their best interest to lower the quality of results because the ads get more useful comparatively.

    Gmail is next I predict. They have a monopoly over consumer email, so it’s revenue growth just waiting to be unlocked when times get tough. A higher percentage of your inbox is going to become paid Gmail ads and there’s nothing you’re going to do about it. Nobody wants to go to the hassle of changing their email address (the amount of boomers still on Yahoo mail is staggering).

    Reply View 0 replies
  • heintmyer 10 months ago

    May I ask why you use search engine for buying something like a mattress or refrigerator? I dont mean to sound that as an insult. I'm genuinely curious. I or anyone I know of will just go to a nearby store and checkout these items to buy. For things like these one would already know who sells these items, even online. So why not directly checkout those stores, either online or physical?

    Reply View 0 replies
stackghost 10 months ago

>The same thing happens every 3-5 years. [...] Google doesn't really care about discoverability for smaller domains that may have good content.

What's galling is that (ostensibly) they used to care. So much for "organizing the world's information" and "don't be evil".

Reply View 1 reply
  • Nevermark 10 months ago

    Well they are certainly organizing the world's information, and continue to be incentivized to do so. Deeply. For advertisers.

    Reply View 0 replies
Workaccount2 10 months ago

I get flashbacks to the exodus of Digg, when the admins basically said "Look, we get a lot of junk content and a lot of common source content so we are going to start fast tracking the common source content from trusted providers"

We all know how that went over.

Reply View 1 reply
  • underlipton 10 months ago

    And then the exodus ruined Reddit. Eternal September dominoes.

    Reply View 0 replies
scottshrum 10 months ago

“The same thing happens every 3-5 years.”

This is so true. I remember when Demand Media was crushing it on Google in the early 2010s. Seem like they were everywhere, and then one day they weren’t.

Reply View 0 replies
paulpauper 10 months ago

Investopedia is another one. Same for bankrate.com Other ones included wikihow and genius.com

Reply View 7 replies