Comment by ghaff

Comment by ghaff 10 months ago

I think Wirecutter is still a decent source; they probably won't steer you too far wrong if you're not too picky. But nothing, including your trusted friends, is an all-knowing oracle if only because their tastes and priorities are probably different from yours. Certainly pre-Internet there were few enough reliable sources of recommendations--maybe some specialist magazines but even those were far from perfect.

eitally 10 months ago

I think you hit the nail on the head. They won't steer you far wrong, but they also may neglect excellent options. For example, they recently published a "best water bottle of 2024" list. They chose to rate Hydroflask #1 and mentioned Yeti in a brief comment about "other bottles to consider" near the bottle. No mention of Kleen Kanteen at all. Yet they do cover the current trendy options of Owala & Stanley Quencher. I don't think it's really objective -- not in the same way that rtings.com is for the electronics categories they review.

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-water-bottle...

Reply View 4 replies

ghaff 10 months ago

That's almost certainly true. Depending on your preferences, there are just a ton of perfectly serviceable options out there, including what you're handed at trade shows. I have some Nalgenes that are sort of the standard for hiking (and fit my water bottle parkas) and otherwise mostly random stuff I've been given.

Reply View | 0 replies
Malidir 10 months ago

No affiliate link = less likely to be a star pick?

Reply View | 2 replies
- flir 10 months ago
  
  That's probably a testable hypothesis, with a little screen scraping and some time.
  
  Reply View | 1 reply
  
  ghaff 10 months ago
  
  Probably also hard to test. I was an analyst for many years and, if you generally hated on a company for reasons that you thought were valid, they were unlikely to hire you.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies