Aurornis 3 days ago

The 6 year, $600K lawsuit was something they initiated against the county.

The initial charges against them were initially dropped to misdemeanors and then dismissed entirely, but that was a separate matter resolved earlier.

  • giantg2 3 days ago

    Even being charged without conviction can result in a serious reduction in job opportunities.

    • hn_throwaway_99 3 days ago

      Is that accurate? Being charged with a crime but then having charges subsequently dropped shouldn't show up in a background check. Plus, given their line of work, I think in their profession it would basically be a badge of honor.

      • port443 3 days ago

        Yes it absolutely matters. My brother was charged with three felonies in his only arrest, all of them dropped.

        It shows up in his background report and no company has cared (or taken the time to notice) that they are dropped charges and not convictions.

        He's basically treated like a felon and effectively got bumped out of his career.

      • giantg2 3 days ago

        You'd have to get it expunged for it to not show up. Even then, it will still show up for security clearances and such.

        • jimt1234 3 days ago

          Can confirm. I needed a security clearance for government contracting work when I was in my mid-30s. The background check flagged a dismissed charge from when I was a teenager.

      • xvector 3 days ago

        It does show up in background checks unfortunately, and it is considered.

      • bigfatkitten 2 days ago

        It’s an absolute pain if you ever need to apply for a security clearance, or a visa for a foreign country.

    • tptacek 3 days ago

      Probably not in this case though.

      • giantg2 3 days ago

        It's hard to say if they would be able to gain security clearances in the future. Not to mention automated application systems will drop them from the system immediately with a prior arrest.

  • red-iron-pine 2 days ago

    how much did those lawyers cost to get the criminal charges dropped?

    600k would certainly be on the high end, but 50k wouldn't be crazy.

    and then impacts for their career, sheer ineptitude of the gubmnt, etc.

  • jongjong 3 days ago

    It seems like a lot. It's not like they were in court full time.

tptacek 3 days ago

This isn't a felony case. In fact, I'm not sure it ever was? It's not clear from their amended complaint, but they were ultimately charged with simple trespassing, a misdemeanor. Those trespassing charges were themselves dismissed a few months later.

What we're talking about today is the resolution of what looks to me (not a lawyer) mostly like a defamation case. Were they defamed? Absolutely. The problem is, to get anything useful out of a defamation case, you need to demonstrate damages. They were accused of a crime --- per se defamation --- but the point of the suit is to recover damages.

I don't want to be glib, and I'm very prepared to be wrong, but the Dallas County Courthouse Incident is likely one of the top 3 world events to have happened to both these pentesters. They've been cause celebres in the field for years and years. It might be pretty tricky to actually demonstrate damages.

  • sophacles 3 days ago

    They were arrested, arraigned and bonded for felony charges. Those were later reduced to misdemeanor charges and the case was eventually dropped/dismissed (can't remember which) - so they were facing felony charges for a while.

  • lazyasciiart 3 days ago

    Lost clearances at least must count for something.

    • tptacek 3 days ago

      Did they lose clearances? If they did, it's not in their civil complaint.

      • lazyasciiart 3 days ago

        I didn’t see how long it took for the charges to change from felony to misdemeanor before being dropped. It would be standard for clearances to be suspended for investigation when you get charged with a felony. (You have to report even an arrest or misdemeanor, but it’s less likely they’ll suspend it while investigating you for those).

        • tptacek 3 days ago

          Their lawyers issued a press release that sketched out the timeline.

edm0nd 3 days ago

I'd gladly take such a payout.

Split 2 ways, that is still 300k.

Parked in an investment at 5% a year, that's an easy +$15,000/year for the rest of your life.

  • nofriend 3 days ago

    Once the lawyers take their cut, you could probably split a ham sandwich between the two of you.

    • dylan604 3 days ago

      Don't forget Uncle Sam's cut as well

      • wl 3 days ago

        Compensatory damages aren't taxable income.

  • [removed] 3 days ago
    [deleted]
  • direwolf20 3 days ago

    Which investment is that?

    • edm0nd 3 days ago

      There are plenty of stocks, REITs, or ETFs that offer such returns.

      Me, personally, I'd dump it into $O aka Realty Income or JEPI or JEPQ.

      If you are risk adverse, just park it in VOO or SCHD.

    • jaapz 3 days ago

      World stock index funds yield something like that

    • Onavo 3 days ago

      Are you actually Michael from the channel?

  • adrr 3 days ago

    How much did they spend on lawyers?

    • jiveturkey 3 days ago

      I would guess this would be a contingency case, which would typically be 40%.

      • adrr 3 days ago

        What about the criminal lawyers that they needed when they charged with crimes? Did they get any money?