lgats 3 days ago

$600k for 6 years of legal battle and facing felony charges? no bueno

  • Aurornis 3 days ago

    The 6 year, $600K lawsuit was something they initiated against the county.

    The initial charges against them were initially dropped to misdemeanors and then dismissed entirely, but that was a separate matter resolved earlier.

    • giantg2 3 days ago

      Even being charged without conviction can result in a serious reduction in job opportunities.

      • hn_throwaway_99 3 days ago

        Is that accurate? Being charged with a crime but then having charges subsequently dropped shouldn't show up in a background check. Plus, given their line of work, I think in their profession it would basically be a badge of honor.

      • tptacek 3 days ago

        Probably not in this case though.

    • red-iron-pine 2 days ago

      how much did those lawyers cost to get the criminal charges dropped?

      600k would certainly be on the high end, but 50k wouldn't be crazy.

      and then impacts for their career, sheer ineptitude of the gubmnt, etc.

    • jongjong 3 days ago

      It seems like a lot. It's not like they were in court full time.

  • tptacek 3 days ago

    This isn't a felony case. In fact, I'm not sure it ever was? It's not clear from their amended complaint, but they were ultimately charged with simple trespassing, a misdemeanor. Those trespassing charges were themselves dismissed a few months later.

    What we're talking about today is the resolution of what looks to me (not a lawyer) mostly like a defamation case. Were they defamed? Absolutely. The problem is, to get anything useful out of a defamation case, you need to demonstrate damages. They were accused of a crime --- per se defamation --- but the point of the suit is to recover damages.

    I don't want to be glib, and I'm very prepared to be wrong, but the Dallas County Courthouse Incident is likely one of the top 3 world events to have happened to both these pentesters. They've been cause celebres in the field for years and years. It might be pretty tricky to actually demonstrate damages.

    • sophacles 3 days ago

      They were arrested, arraigned and bonded for felony charges. Those were later reduced to misdemeanor charges and the case was eventually dropped/dismissed (can't remember which) - so they were facing felony charges for a while.

    • lazyasciiart 3 days ago

      Lost clearances at least must count for something.

      • tptacek 3 days ago

        Did they lose clearances? If they did, it's not in their civil complaint.

  • edm0nd 3 days ago

    I'd gladly take such a payout.

    Split 2 ways, that is still 300k.

    Parked in an investment at 5% a year, that's an easy +$15,000/year for the rest of your life.

    • nofriend 3 days ago

      Once the lawyers take their cut, you could probably split a ham sandwich between the two of you.

      • dylan604 3 days ago

        Don't forget Uncle Sam's cut as well

    • [removed] 3 days ago
      [deleted]
    • direwolf20 3 days ago

      Which investment is that?

      • edm0nd 3 days ago

        There are plenty of stocks, REITs, or ETFs that offer such returns.

        Me, personally, I'd dump it into $O aka Realty Income or JEPI or JEPQ.

        If you are risk adverse, just park it in VOO or SCHD.

      • jaapz 3 days ago

        World stock index funds yield something like that

      • Onavo 3 days ago

        Are you actually Michael from the channel?

    • adrr 3 days ago

      How much did they spend on lawyers?

      • jiveturkey 3 days ago

        I would guess this would be a contingency case, which would typically be 40%.

        • adrr 3 days ago

          What about the criminal lawyers that they needed when they charged with crimes? Did they get any money?

unsnap_biceps 3 days ago

Darknet Diaries did an interview with the two pentesters: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/59/