Comment by TedDallas

Comment by TedDallas 3 days ago

15 replies

Per Anthropic’s RCA linked in Ops post for September 2025 issues:

“… To state it plainly: We never reduce model quality due to demand, time of day, or server load. …”

So according to Anthropic they are not tweaking quality setting due to demand.

rootnod3 3 days ago

And according to Google, they always delete data if requested.

And according to Meta, they always give you ALL the data they have on you when requested.

  • entropicdrifter 3 days ago

    >And according to Google, they always delete data if requested.

    However, the request form is on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard'.

  • groundzeros2015 3 days ago

    What would you like?

    • AlexandrB 3 days ago

      An SLA-style contractually binding agreement.

      • edmundsauto 3 days ago

        I bet this is available in large enterprise agreements. How much are you willing to pay for it?

cmrdporcupine 3 days ago

I guess I just don't know how to square that with my actual experiences then.

I've seen sporadic drops in reasoning skills that made me feel like it was January 2025, not 2026 ... inconsistent.

  • quadrature 3 days ago

    LLMs sample the next token from a conditional probability distribution, the hope is that dumb sequences are less probable but they will just happen naturally.

    • mattmanser 3 days ago

      Funny how those probabilities consistently at 2pm UK time when all the Americans come online...

    • tempaccount420 3 days ago

      It's more like the choice between "the" and "a" than "yes" and "no".

  • root_axis 3 days ago

    I wouldn't doubt that these companies would deliberately degrade performance to manage load, but it's also true that humans are notoriously terrible at identifying random distributions, even with something as simple as a coin flip. It's very possible that what you view as degradation is just "bad RNG".

    • cmrdporcupine 3 days ago

      yep stochastic fantastic

      these things are by definition hard to reason about

chrisjj 3 days ago

That's about model quality. Nothing about output quality.

stefan_ 3 days ago

Thats what is called an "overly specific denial". It sounds more palatable if you say "we deployed a newly quantized model of Opus and here are cherry picked benchmarks to show its the same", and even that they don't announce publicly.