Comment by volkk 4 days ago
i've been using AI for as long as GPT has been out, so if you can't see through the rambling, overly complex to make you sound smarter kind of text, as well as the written patterns that are always used ad nauseam like "this thing isn't JUST this, it's THIS" -- i dunno how else to prove it to you. IYKYK.
if you're a writer, and you're using GPT for so long and you can't see it as obvious, i dunno what to tell you at this point. i guess LLMs are trained particularly on this guy's writing.
here's your evidence, tanner https://xcancel.com/PlumbNick/status/2016590894485385347#m
I'm not going to say i told you so, but you should utilize these tools more before you start arguing, especially when it's so goddamn obvious
If you can’t explain it, then you don’t actually understand it.
i just don't feel like enumerating all of the common patterns ai slop produces. again, if you don't see this as obvious, i can tell you're clearly not using this stuff often enough (which might be a good thing)
> i dunno how else to prove it to you
A prompt to generate similar output would be a good start.
how's this for your prompt, pal https://xcancel.com/PlumbNick/status/2016590894485385347#m
hopefully that's enough of a good start and a good end for this conversation
I have also used GPTs since 2020. I am also a writer. Much of the writing equated with “generated by AI” is so precisely because it’s broadly trained on real writing.
So the claim of “AI slop” without proof is little more than heresy. It would be helpful to have any evidence.
It’s not about just the writing in one example, it’s about writing patterns—which are common—being equated with AI simply because they’re common.