Comment by tannerc

Comment by tannerc 4 days ago

18 replies

I have also used GPTs since 2020. I am also a writer. Much of the writing equated with “generated by AI” is so precisely because it’s broadly trained on real writing.

So the claim of “AI slop” without proof is little more than heresy. It would be helpful to have any evidence.

It’s not about just the writing in one example, it’s about writing patterns—which are common—being equated with AI simply because they’re common.

volkk 4 days ago

if you're a writer, and you're using GPT for so long and you can't see it as obvious, i dunno what to tell you at this point. i guess LLMs are trained particularly on this guy's writing.

  • tannerc 4 days ago

    So you have zero evidence to convey something you claim is “obvious”? Got it.

    • volkk 4 days ago

      here's your evidence, tanner https://xcancel.com/PlumbNick/status/2016590894485385347#m

      I'm not going to say i told you so, but you should utilize these tools more before you start arguing, especially when it's so goddamn obvious

      • tannerc 4 days ago

        If you read his original draft you can see how much of it was still carried over, as well as how his original writing conveys much of your same arguments that an AI wrote the final text.

        I don’t think your point is as strong as you believe it is.

        Lastly, I work directly with AI models and utilize all popular generators every single day, so I don’t know why you think you’re the expert here.

        • volkk 4 days ago

          my point was that its AI slop. whether his original point is intact doesn't matter to me. the fact that you're now defensively doubling down and steering the conversation into a direction which serves you better is just cringe. i bet you're a pleasure to work with. c ya later nerd.

  • layer8 4 days ago

    If you can’t explain it, then you don’t actually understand it.

    • volkk 4 days ago

      i just don't feel like enumerating all of the common patterns ai slop produces. again, if you don't see this as obvious, i can tell you're clearly not using this stuff often enough (which might be a good thing)

      • layer8 4 days ago

        The thing is, these stylistic patterns existed before AI, and weren’t completely atypical. Maybe you’re using LLMs so much that you’re over-associating them with AI now. Or maybe the author is using LLMs so much that he’s unconsciously adopted some of the patterns in his own writing.