TrnsltLife 5 days ago

Neither of them were abiding by the law. Nor were either of them executed. Such hyperbole.

  • 0dayz 4 days ago

    Abiding the law?

    What law did they break to constitute being shot dead on the spot?

    Or do you now support vague charges like "obstruction of justice"?

    • kreetx 4 days ago

      One person showed up with a gun, the other tried to flee (or run over) an officer.

      Wold you as a police officer always behave perfectly in any urgent situation?

      • array_key_first 4 days ago

        Trying to flee is famously not a justification for murder, if anything it's the opposite. You're literally kicking someone while they're down. Or, uh, shooting them. Obviously a fleeing person is not a threat to your life, which is the ONLY justification for a shooting.

      • 0dayz 4 days ago

        So anytime an officer kills a person with a gun, that is now justified?

        Despite the fact that the man in question that was killed had a legal permit for said gun AND 1 of the ICE agent even took his gun away and despite this was shot to death while lying on the ground?

        So where is the urgency? Not enough KDA ratio to score high enough on the scoreboard?

      • vharuck 4 days ago

        If you have the right to bear arms, but law enforcement officers can shoot you if they spot that gun, then you don't actually have the right to bear arms.

        • kreetx 4 days ago

          You do have the right to bear arms but bearing arms conveys a meaning, that you'd see a reason to use it, so if you have a gun at an event where there are ample amounts of law enforcement present, against who would you be protecting yourself?

      • dannyfreeman 4 days ago

        It is famously against the law to own a gun, and carry it with a permit in the United States.

  • [removed] 4 days ago
    [deleted]
solaris2007 4 days ago

This kind of made up bullshit makes you look like a total lunatic.