Comment by cush

Comment by cush 11 hours ago

7 replies

> There isn't currently a forcing function

Sorry but if there wasn’t a forcing function then “Apple Picks Gemini to Power Siri” wouldn’t be the headline

JumpCrisscross 11 hours ago

> if there wasn’t a forcing function then “Apple Picks Gemini to Power Siri” wouldn’t be the headline

A pair four-trillion dollar companies striking a deal in the hottest technology space since the internet getting headline treatment is not evidence of a forcing function.

  • hnlmorg 8 hours ago

    Them having bolted on ChatGPT in the ugly way they did is evidence though.

    Their naff image generation tool (Playground) is further evidence.

    Apple are definitely panicking. And they should be too.

    • JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago

      > Them having bolted on ChatGPT in the ugly way they did is evidence though

      That's evidence they forced themselves. Not that there was a forcing function. That's the whole point of the top comment. (Mine.) They rushed where they didn't have to. And I still don't think they need to rush.

    • walthamstow 7 hours ago

      Not enough things are referred to as naff these days, which is funny because there's so much naff shit knocking around.

  • cush 11 hours ago

    I mean, maybe if the headline was “For no particular reason whatsoever, under absolutely no pressure from their millions of customers to deliver on the promises they paid for nearly two years ago, Apple picks Gemini to Power Siri”

    Or maybe you’re arguing that Apple never did intend to commit to those promises and it was all intentional and part of a well orchestrated plan from the outset? Seems like an odd strategy

    • JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago

      > if the headline was “For no particular reason whatsoever, under absolutely no pressure from their millions of customers to deliver on the promises they paid for nearly two years ago, Apple picks Gemini to Power Siri”

      Which is not how headlines work.

      You may have an argument that Apple is under pressure. But your headline argument is bananas.

      > maybe you’re arguing that Apple never did intend to commit to those promises

      Where did you get that?

      The attitude I called "fucked up" is precisely rushing to make promises and then meet them. Apple's sales don't suggest customers are putting material pressure on Cupertino. Apple's share price doesn't suggest investors are panicking. The promises have already been broken. If Apple is pushing something out, again, because they feel they have to on the basis of those promises, it's–again-a fuckup.

      • cush 8 hours ago

        > Which is not how headlines work

        That’s the joke. I assure you they are panicking.