Comment by kimixa

Comment by kimixa 12 hours ago

40 replies

That happened to me when I had an ipad in a standing case and the seat in front cranked back - trapping then pinging the tablet across me and by neighbour's lap.

Though the ipad itself wasn't damaged, a couple of glasses didn't make it, and required the steward to try to brush up whatever fragments of glass they could.

I feel that airlines are a microcosm of "Do you care about who you actions might affect?" - similar to the "Do you return the cart to the corral" test at supermarkets - are you willing to put even the smallest bit of effort to significantly improve other people's experiences?

spydr 9 hours ago

> do you care about who your actions might affect

This one surprises me every time I fly. When I have the aisle seat I can be up and out in 10 seconds. It seems to make like everyone else will plop down , place down 3 different liquids on the tray and then take a nap. When I ask to use the bathroom I end up feeling like a nuisance

vasco 8 hours ago

Airlines shouldn't have reclining seats, it's bad design. Blaming people for the bad design is stupid. I never recline and still blame it on the design. Stupid people exist, you should design for that.

  • sp8 7 hours ago

    Sorry for an empty response but this, 100% this. As a person who is WELL over 6' tall, the very idea that the person in front of me might recline is enough to give me significant anxiety throughout a flight. I once saw a design for seats where the base slides forward if you want to recline - the idea being, if you're going to recline you're going to do so into your own space, not the person behind you. I'd be a big advocate of that change in seat design...

  • CalRobert 8 hours ago

    Flights from sfo to Frankfurt bolt upright sound unpleasant…

    Not to mention that when my wife was pregnant she could barely manage her back pain -with- the recline, never mind without.

    The recline button is there for your use. You are welcome to avail of it yourself.

    • oneeyedpigeon 5 hours ago

      > You are welcome to avail of it yourself.

      Ah, the exact opposite of the "pay it forward" principle...

      • srmarm 2 hours ago

        That's exactly how it usually happens in my experience. I think a lot of people are OK if everyones upright on short haul flights (here most budget airlines don't have a recline facility and it's not missed) but once someone reclines into your space you then recline to gain a little space back and the domino effect takes place even if you're not sleeping.

        • gambiting 32 minutes ago

          And then the person in the last row is screwed because they are in a seat that doesn't recline but the seat in front of them does, so they have to sit like a canned sardine for the entire flight(ask me how I know).

    • close04 5 hours ago

      > Flights from sfo to Frankfurt bolt upright sound unpleasant

      Same flight with someone's seat resting on your knees is downright painful.

      > when my wife was pregnant

      Imagine if she was a bit taller and someone reclined the seat all the way over her.

      > The recline button is there for your use

      You're right, like any shared resource, "space" is there for you to use. It doesn't mean you have to use it, you could try to be aware of your surroundings and assess whether your small comfort should come at the cost of someone else's extreme discomfort. And if you use the button others are also free, and probably correct, to call you a dick. Like a guy who empties the bowl of complimentary candy someone offers to all customers.

      You shouldn't need physical blocks or laws to define your own common sense and decency.

      • ahtihn 17 minutes ago

        I'm 185cm and I couldn't imagine having to endure a long haul flight without reclining.

        I never get these discussions. It's only ever online that I see complaints. Almost everyone reclines on long flights. It's normal. It's expected. If it makes you uncomfortable that's a you problem, everyone else seems fine with it. If it makes you physically uncomfortable, pay for extra leg room. Don't make your problem the problem of another passenger.

      • CalRobert 5 hours ago

        So why is the recline button there?

  • 123pie123 7 hours ago

    in reality there should be a legal minimum leg room that's based on the distance of the flight

    the recline feature should be baked in to this as well

    • varjag 3 hours ago

      It's the 21st century. Blowhards of the world united with the miracle of technology are moaning at any attempt of common sense regulation. This will become culture wars material right away.

  • nostromo 8 hours ago

    I think reclining is appropriate at night only. If it were up to me, they would be locked upright during the day.

    • DaanDL 3 hours ago

      Night or day is a vague concept on an 11 hour flight

  • dec0dedab0de 2 hours ago

    I think that they should just make reclining mandatory

  • baxtr 8 hours ago

    It wouldn't surprise me if Ryanair had reclining seats that reclined only if you paid for it.

    • iainmerrick 6 hours ago

      I think the secret of Ryanair is that their goal is actually to make their turnarounds as fast and efficient as possible, not explicitly to make money by adding a fee for every little aspect of the service.

      If anything can possibly slow down flight boarding, disembarking or cleanup, they'll first try to remove it completely, and only if people object too much will they reluctantly offer it with a fee.

      Pocket on the seat back -> most people don't use on short flights -> get rid of them.

      Luggage -> most people need this, but not everyone -> charge a fee.

      Reclining seat -> most people don't use on short flights -> get rid of them.

      They do sell drinks and duty free; that's an interesting one. I guess once the flight is airborne, the flight attendants aren't really doing anything else (from management's perspective) so they might as well sell stuff. Plus the trolley blocking the aisle stops passengers from moving around, which they probably see as a big advantage.

      I think this even applies to the ridiculous penalty fees they charge for e.g. trying to check in at the airport rather than doing it beforehand on the app. It feels like they're just trying to rip you off, but I suspect they see it more as a "nudge" to make people check in online, because that streamlines their airport process.

      I got a little bit less annoyed by them when I realised this. Sure, it's still uncomfortable and sometimes infuriating, but it's all with the aim of an efficient and reliable service, and they're way better than average at that.

      • KolmogorovComp 2 hours ago

        That's not (really) it.

        Ryanair makes little to no money from passengers, nowadays it's mainly from selling airplanes. They were still profitable during COVID without even carrying passengers at some point, only thanks to their flying school, which thanks to social dumping and the UE, allow them to charge 40k€ per wannabe pilot without even guaranteeing them a hire.

        They booked 2000 737max, with their own special version during COVID+MCAS disaster, they paid it dirt cheap.

        Then they operate them marginally, and now that the traffic has gone up again and the delay between buying and receiving a Max is about 8 years, they sell them back for a huge profit.

        It's been known for ages in the industry.

        • iainmerrick an hour ago

          Do you have a link for that? It sounds interesting but a bit unlikely. It's hard to see how charging for pilot training, even at 40K a pop, would be a sustainable business.

          The thing about buying planes is also interesting, but sounds like a sneaky business move rather than the actual foundation of the business.

          I've always heard that nobody really makes money from passengers, which is why airlines are always going bankrupt, and I'm sure Ryanair's margins are super skinny. But even so, it does seem like moving passengers around is the core of their business, rather than it just being a front for something else.

      • varjag 3 hours ago

        > It feels like they're just trying to rip you off, but I suspect they see it more as a "nudge" to make people check in online, because that streamlines their airport process.

        I believe the airline pays the airport for every check in and luggage handling transaction. They are just cutting costs.

      • baxtr 4 hours ago

        Great analysis and insight! Thanks for sharing

      • short_sells_poo 4 hours ago

        I never thought of it this way, but now it's clear.

        I found that once I tack on luggage, a seat with more space, etc.. they become more expensive than traditional airlines with the same package.

        In other words, their business model really seems to be to cater to the "least hassle" passengers who travel light and don't need any extras.

    • foota 7 hours ago

      "Your neighbor is trying to recline, outbid them to stop them..."

    • rsynnott 7 hours ago

      Ryanair doesn't have reclining seats at all.

      • baxtr 6 hours ago

        Which means they haven’t found a way to monetize the feature yet!

  • rsynnott 7 hours ago

    This is one thing I like about Ryanair; they don't.

haritha-j 6 hours ago

I actually quite liek yanair's no frills no recline design. For some reason it feels less clusterphobic to me. it just feels more spacious and roomy, despite the absence of space.

[removed] 8 hours ago
[deleted]
VTimofeenko 10 hours ago

And if you are the airline the answer is a resounding "no"

  • nebula8804 10 hours ago

    The airline is not a human being. It is an imaginary construct.

    • Dylan16807 8 hours ago

      And yet it still gets to participate and answer the question in the worst way.

      • nebula8804 7 hours ago

        Only in some messed up parts of the world.

        • Dylan16807 7 hours ago

          Airlines pick out what seats they want and how to space them in most of the world, don't they?

          That's the root cause of the suffering here. The actions with the strongest ill effects.