Comment by ggm

Comment by ggm 18 hours ago

2 replies

I think this is a good move for Apple. It avoids tying them directly to internalised beliefs in their own AI model, it avoids all the capex around building out an AI engine and associated DC, it reduces risk, and it keeps google in a relationship under contract which google will value, and probably value enough to think hard about stupid legal games regarding Playstore and walled gardens.

Apple plainly doesn't believe in the uplift and impending AGI doom. Nor do they believe there's no value in AI services. They just think for NOW at least they can buy in better than they can own.

But based on Apples VLSI longterm vision, on their other behaviours in times past with IPR in any space, they will ultimately take ownership.

bigyabai 14 hours ago

> they will ultimately take ownership.

How? People have been saying this since CoreML dropped nine years ago. Apple is no closer to revamping Siri or rebuking CUDA than they were back then.

  • ggm 11 hours ago

    When the cost of deployment drops. And, when their own chip designs are profitable, they'll take the capital hit. Until then, as long as the income split for Gemini backed siri isn't terrible they'll stay an outsource. If they persuade Google to deploy Apple chips into the service I'd say an in-house is within sight.

    Apple private relay runs in cloudflare and fastly and I believe one other major. They certainly can and do run services for a long time with partners.