baby 3 hours ago

Lots of loyalists have replaced people there. It's for sure incompetence.

  • jimbo808 3 hours ago

    There are hundreds of thousands of documents being reviewed by probably a thousand or more FBI agents. There is zero chance they are all loyalists.

  • tremon 2 hours ago

    Indeed, incompetence is basically guaranteed if the organization selects for allegiance rather than competence. But I prefer to think that at least part of this was malicious compliance, because that suggests that at least some people at the FBI still have their soul.

cmarschner 7 hours ago

Since hundreds of people were involved the most likely explanation is incompetence

  • thdrtol 5 hours ago

    Once I worked for a company that got a quote in the form of a Word document. Turned out it had history turned on and quotes to competitors could be recovered.

    There is a lot of incompitence when it comes to file formats.

    • SvenL 25 minutes ago

      You don’t even need a digital format for this. When I was a consultant I waited in a room with a flip chart for a negotiation. I flipped through the “old slides” of the flip chart and found one where they did budget planning for the project. This was very good background info for the negotiations.

    • vidarh 2 hours ago

      For one of my first jobs I negotiated a better offer because "strings" on the document revealed the previous offer they'd sent out, and made me confident I could ask for more.

      Though, makes me wonder if someone has intentionally sent out offers like that with lower numbers to make people think they're outsmarting them.

    • sallveburrpi an hour ago

      To be fair handling Word documents is much more complex than redacting a PDF properly.

    • quickthrowman 2 hours ago

      Similarly, I’ve been sent PDF proposal letters by my customers with redacted pricing from my competitors so I can compare the scope against mine. A simple unflatten reveals the price along with the scope.

  • wkat4242 4 hours ago

    I'm sure not all those hundreds have been involved with every document.

    I'm kinda surprised (and disappointed) nobody has done a Snowden on it though.

  • ndsipa_pomu 6 hours ago

    Having lots of people involved means that it's more likely to be malicious compliance or deniable sabotage. It only needs one person who disagrees with the redactions to start doing things that they know will allow info to leak.

    • michaelt an hour ago

      Doesn’t having lots of people involved also raise the chance of incompetence?

      You’re more likely to get at least one inept agent in a random sample of 1000 than a sample of 10.

  • locknitpicker 4 hours ago

    > Since hundreds of people were involved the most likely explanation is incompetence

    Hundreds of people might be involved, but the only key factor required for a single point of failure to propagate to the deliverable is lack of verification.

    And God knows how the Trump administration is packed with inexperiente incompetents assigned to positions where they are way way over their head, and routinely commit the most basic mistakes.

jvanderbot 2 hours ago

And here we are again rediscovering Hanlon's Razor.

  • xzjis 2 hours ago

    It wouldn't be malicious though. Well, it's malicious towards the Trump administration, but not towards the people. Quite the opposite.

    • seg_lol an hour ago

      The maliciousness is always towards the compliance.