Comment by shoobiedoo

Comment by shoobiedoo 3 days ago

4 replies

okay, but if you care about recall and activating regions of the brain that create a better understanding of what you're learning, handwriting wins according to research.

BeFlatXIII 2 days ago

But is there a difference between cursive and block lettering? I fully agree with your overall point about handwritten notes being far superior to typed notes. It forces you to filter out extraneous information instead of being a live transcriptionist of your professor.

thrwaway55 3 days ago

I've found drilling notes via method of loci of visualized flashcards/facts for this to be superior for myself which I always sourced from typed notes. Not really familiar with the research that cursive would improve over it.

squigz 2 days ago

Can you link to some of that research? The last time I saw such research get shared on HN, the researchers were limiting the typists to 1 finger (per hand?), which is patently absurd.

More than that, I would be curious to see research that controls for proficiency at writing/typing. My theory is that if more kids were taught to properly touch type from an early age, the alleged differences between writing/typing would be far less dramatic. I was taught since kindergarten and there's no doubt in my mind that I absorb and understand information better through typing than writing. I'm also much, much, much faster. Brief Googling suggests I'm at least 10x faster than the average WPM for handwriting

Instead, here we are talking about how cursive should actually still be taught.

  • shoobiedoo a day ago

    Mueller & Oppenheimer (2014) – available via Psychological Science / SAGE (DOI: 10.1177/0956797614524581)

    Longcamp et al. (2005) – PubMed or Elsevier (Acta Psychologica)

    Smoker et al. (2009) – Human Factors and Ergonomics Society proceedings

    Umejima et al. (2021) – Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (open access)

    Ito et al. (2020) – HCII conference proceedings (Springer CCIS)