Tor3 2 hours ago

"It feels very much an anti-US rule to me."

It isn't. Quite the opposite. It's about a level playing field. There are standards for allowing products to market, some of them are more costly to implement. US car makers want to sell at lower standards than competitors, that's not a level playing field.

  • ExoticPearTree an hour ago

    The would be customers should decide that. If they want a car that is bigger, harder to park, has poor fuel consumption and so on.

    • Tor3 24 minutes ago

      The customer has no right to deside on issues that affect _others_. A customer can decide on what affects the customer. If car A is more dangerous for other people than car B, then it's for somebody else than the car customer to decide what should be allowed. A car owner can't decide that "it's fine to drive this car which will kill other people because of its design".

    • saubeidl an hour ago

      So if I want to, I should be able to drive a literal tank? What a poorly thought out argument.

      Cars are a danger to others, that's why your own choices shouldn't be the only thing that matters.

georgefrowny 2 hours ago

It feels very much like a self-inflicted problem that manufacturers made by lobbying for domestic rules that they knew to be incompatible with foreign markets, followed by inability to innovate sufficiently to supply both markets economically.

I have no sympathy with this plight. They should take responsibility for their past choices. They have agency, they're not victims.

It's not even that you can't see big pickups in the EU, there are plenty of Hiluxen and even Chinese brands like Maxus (SAIC) could figure out how make an EU-compliant vehicle (much as I think even such models are undesirable to share roads with).

It's also not there are no US imports - there are, when the models comply with local regulation.