askedrelic 14 hours ago

This matches some previous comments around LLMs driving adoption of programming languages or frameworks. If you ask Claude to write a web app, why not have it use your own framework, that it was trained on, by default?

Reply View 1 reply
  • fishmicrowaver 13 hours ago

    Users are far more likely to ask it about shadcn, or material, than about node/deno/bun. So, what is this about?

    Reply View 0 replies
ojame 14 hours ago

Currently Claude etc. can interact with services (including AWS) via MCPs.

What the user you're replying to is saying the Bun acquisition looks silly as a dev tool for Node. However if you look at their binding work for services like s3[0], the LLM will be able to interact directly with cloud services directly (lower latency, tighter integration, simplified deployment).

0: https://bun.com/docs/runtime/s3

Reply View 7 replies
  • mrcsharp 14 hours ago

    That doesn't make sense either. Agents already have access to MCPs and Tools. Your example is solved by having an S3 wrapper as a set of tools.

    Reply View 3 replies
    • rs186 16 minutes ago

      I bet you didn't click that link. A wrapper and an API that is built-in to the runtime and optimized for those use cases are different things.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • [removed] 8 hours ago
      [deleted]
      Reply View 0 replies
    • solumunus 5 hours ago

      Being able to remove a layer of abstraction to get the thing done is usually good right?

      Reply View 0 replies
  • fishmicrowaver 13 hours ago

    An AI company scoops up frontend tech. Do you really think it was because of s3?

    Reply View 2 replies
    • rs186 18 minutes ago

      JavaScript ≠ frontend

      bun ≠ front end development tool

      hasn't been like that for many years

      Reply View 0 replies
    • gedy 11 hours ago

      Bun is not really frontend tech

      Reply View 0 replies