Comment by ojame

Comment by ojame 14 hours ago

7 replies

Currently Claude etc. can interact with services (including AWS) via MCPs.

What the user you're replying to is saying the Bun acquisition looks silly as a dev tool for Node. However if you look at their binding work for services like s3[0], the LLM will be able to interact directly with cloud services directly (lower latency, tighter integration, simplified deployment).

0: https://bun.com/docs/runtime/s3

mrcsharp 14 hours ago

That doesn't make sense either. Agents already have access to MCPs and Tools. Your example is solved by having an S3 wrapper as a set of tools.

  • rs186 16 minutes ago

    I bet you didn't click that link. A wrapper and an API that is built-in to the runtime and optimized for those use cases are different things.

  • [removed] 8 hours ago
    [deleted]
  • solumunus 5 hours ago

    Being able to remove a layer of abstraction to get the thing done is usually good right?

fishmicrowaver 13 hours ago

An AI company scoops up frontend tech. Do you really think it was because of s3?

  • rs186 19 minutes ago

    JavaScript ≠ frontend

    bun ≠ front end development tool

    hasn't been like that for many years

  • gedy 11 hours ago

    Bun is not really frontend tech