Comment by keyle

Comment by keyle 2 days ago

88 replies

I typically jump on the latest macOS with enthusiasm. I once made the mistake to install the beta version of the next os, and well, that didn't go well for me. But typically, within X.1, I'm there.

However something shifted since this "visionOS" melted version of macOS (Tahoe); where I have absolutely no intension to upgrade from Sequoia. I hope they will fix it by the time I'll be forced to upgrade (post support deadline).

It started with the macOS that brought the iOS settings panel. We went from a logical structure of easily findable stuff to a complete mess. Just open the "Keyboard" settings on macOS today and it's bewildering how they could ship this and think this is fine. Steve would roll in his grave.

The process to allow running applications that are unsigned is just a horrible hack. It feels like a last minute "shove it and move on!".

By 2035 I wonder if we'll be all running KDE or WindowMaker and the hell with modern OS GUI.

From a Gestalt standpoint, human relations with desktop computers are not the same as with thumb driven mobile OS or air-pinch driven vision OS, period. The hell with "glass" or "flat" design. Desktop OS should be as forgettable as possible, as it's about having long stints of flow, not giving a feeling of "air" or "play".

AnonC 2 days ago

> It started with the macOS that brought the iOS settings panel. We went from a logical structure of easily findable stuff to a complete mess.

It’s difficult to pinpoint when exactly the decline started. But one key event before the Settings app was the Catalyst apps that were straight out and dismal ports from their iOS versions. Till date, none of those work well and cannot be navigated properly using the keyboard. Reminders, Messages, Notes and more.

Craig Federighi seems to be increasingly taking on so much authority without having a trusted set of people under him and his leadership (or lack of it) has resulted in neglecting software across device platforms. Some of the Apple apps on tvOS with paid subscriptions are worse, because the bugs in them don’t get any attention at all.

  • airstrike a day ago

    Notes straight up crashes if you "open this note in a separate window" and edit from there for prolonged periods of time (minutes, not days)

    I think if you minimize the main window it gets even worse

    It's completely unacceptable

    • happymellon a day ago

      I'm curious if this is a bug that other people deal with, but I have to screenshot stuff to send folks all the time.

      Screenshot, right click, and "copy" doesn't appear. Sometimes moving the app to another screen makes it appear, sometimes just switching to another app and back will help, sometimes I can't get it to be an option at all and I have to close screenshot and retry.

      Really awful. Just make it an option all the time.

      • pjmlp a day ago

        When Microsoft decided to rewrite the screenshot app from Win32 to WinUI, it had plenty of bugs, to the point I kept the old exe around for about one year.

        The one that mostly bothered me, was not being able to select desktop regions if using multiple monitors, the rectangle region went nuts on what was possible to select.

      • Ghoelian a day ago

        I just want to be able to save the image to a folder and copy it to my clipboard when taking a screenshot. iirc in KDE Plasma's Spectacle, these options are checkboxes, you can enable as many at once as you like.

        • airstrike a day ago

          Have it set to the clipboard always, and then to save somewhere cmd+space open preview and hit cmd+N

    • wahnfrieden a day ago

      If you cut text in a "separate window" note, it will delete the text, but it won't actually copy it unless you issued the command for a note in the main window. So when you go to paste it elsewhere, you find it's gone, and then you often find Notes has lost the undo history too.

  • olivewong 16 hours ago

    my beef is with the new iOS having to take like 3 clicks to disable bluetooth now

    • RGamma 2 hours ago

      And no easy way to block phone numbers from the caller list (among other things). iOS 26 is the first upgrade I really regretted.

mrkpdl 2 days ago

I’ve always felt the decline in Mac OS started on the day of the ‘Back To The Mac’ event in 2010. And has continued since. Symbolically this event made clear the iOS first focus of the company. And since then Mac OS updates have continued to be secondary/lesser to iOS.

Mac OS is still my system of choice, but I don’t have as much confidence in it as I would like.

The big thing from around fifteen years ago is the mixed modes for autosave, where they sort of half heartedly changed the language around save/save as and just sort of… left it. Some apps use their new (for the 2010s) auto save system and some don’t. And it’s up the the user to muddle through. Weird. And there are many half baked things like this in the OS now.

Mac hardware, on the other hand, has never been better than it is right now!

  • Someone a day ago

    > The big thing from around fifteen years ago is the mixed modes for autosave, where they sort of half heartedly changed the language around save/save as and just sort of… left it. Some apps use their new (for the 2010s) auto save system and some don’t.

    I may be mistaken, but AFAIK, all Apple’s apps auto-save on quit and restore state on open. If so, what do you suggest they do about making third party applications do that as well?

  • randmeerkat a day ago

    > Mac hardware, on the other hand, has never been better than it is right now!

    I thought the same until trying a framework laptop with Ubuntu. Mac is the “IBM” choice, no one gets fired for choosing it, but quite frankly there’s better options these days.

    • ghqst a day ago

      A framework laptop is very nice, and definitely has a lot of upsides, but it can't match screen, keyboard, trackpad, camera, or speaker quality with a MacBook Pro, not to mention the battery life.

      • akho a day ago

        Those may be nice for people who need them, and are ok with the software side.

        for me, the screen on the framework is ok. I think there's little to gain with LCDs at this point. The trackpad on the framework is smaller, so it's better. A nicer camera requires a nicer piece of tape to cover it, I guess. Notification beeps do not require Atmos or whatever. I can pack a powerbank for trans-oceanic flights, but I'm usually at a desk if I work long stretches.

        Having nicer stuff would be nice, but the value proposition does not work for me in light of the software situation.

      • linguae a day ago

        I concur. I have a Framework 13 I use as my personal laptop and a work-issued M3 MacBook Pro. While I love the freedom that my Framework 13 provides in terms of user serviceability and operating system choice, the MacBook Pro feels more premium, and it has absolutely amazing battery life.

      • lostmsu 10 hours ago

        What do people like about MacBook trackpads? I can't stand them because you can only do a "click" action at the bottom of the thing, but there's nothing tactile that would help you to find it.

venturecruelty a day ago

By 2035, I'm not even sure I'll have a computer. (Sort of a joke, but like, at this rate...)

My current OS X update strategy is: I don't, mostly. I'm a few versions behind, and at this point, I'd rather keep an OS that sort of works and just deal with the script kiddies, then upgrade to an OS that doesn't work and have to deal with my OS vendor.

  • dijit a day ago

    You kid, but you might be onto something.

    The majority of users are content with chromebooks, what does that tell you about the requirements of desktop computers today? It tells me that they are just niche professional tools; and professional tools largely suck for UX..

    I had an interesting realisation the other day (that's tangentially related): on my iPhone and iPad: I can't access my work emails or chats at all. Yet on my significantly more difficult to secure laptops: no problem.

    The mobile platforms have built-in mechanisms for remote attestation. Desktop operating systems do not.

    I think as soon as companies realise that an iPad is "good enough" for email/excel/word workers, we'll see an even more precipitous decline of the desktop operating system experience.

    • pr3dr49 18 hours ago

      "I think as soon as companies realise that an iPad is "good enough" for email/excel/word workers, we'll see an even more precipitous decline of the desktop operating system experience."

      This has a ring of SurfacePro as a corporate EUC choice. Quite common these days.

    • Liftyee a day ago

      Maybe my definition of UX is behind the times, but I think professional tools have great UX for their intended users... Professionals.

      Fine grained control, informative error messages, thought out keybinds, all make the system easier to use for experts

      • dijit a day ago

        Professional software is aimed at people who use it day in day out so they’re optimising for a different problem than software that’s aimed at the casual user.

        Intuitiveness is often seen as a outright positive by most people but actually it’s more of a trade off. Often the greatest efficiency is achieved by interfaces that require a bit of learning by the user. The ultimate example of that is command line interfaces which are very powerful and efficient but require you to know what you’re doing and give you relatively little help.

        You’re on the other side of a steep learning curve for a lot of professional software you use. A steep learning curve is bad UX.

  • usefulcat a day ago

    I regularly wait almost a year after a given version of MacOS has been released before upgrading. I don't care about new features, and I already spend all day fixing bugs of my own creation. That leaves very little time for debugging other people's software.

    • bluescrn a day ago

      Meanwhile in Windows world, Win11 has been out for what, 4 years?, and we’re still clinging to Win10

weaksauce a day ago

about 5 months ago i jumped ship to kde plasma and it's been great. took a month or two to get the most prized things working the way i wanted but kde is so configurable that you can get it to work pretty much identical to a mac. toshy gives you all the familiar mac keyboard shortcuts and lets you do per application configs. I can't see going back to a mac unless an employer mandated it. the freedom you have is refreshing. if something doesn't work the way you want it you can change it.

  • xp84 a day ago

    > if something doesn't work the way you want it you can change it.

    This sentence here is my biggest heartbreak with modern “computing.” I came up in the Windows 98/XP days and over about 7 years from 98-05 basically gained full mastery of basically every aspect of Windows and how to change it, and also from 03 on started using Mac OS X daily and found it to be just as customizable or more, in most ways that mattered. I felt that my computer was my own and loved having full control, making it perfect for me.

    None of that is possible now. You cannot even select your own notification sound for Messages on MacOS anymore. Only the 20 sounds packaged with the OS. What. The. F%$k.

    • safety1st a day ago

      This is because in any monopoly/duopoly/oligopoly, the product inevitably stops being about what the user wants, and becomes about what the monopolist wants. They're removing features like this because simplifying configurations translates to reduced support costs, and reducing their costs and padding their margin is the name of the game for a monopolist, they believe there's nowhere else for you to go, so they can and will hose you over and over again.

      We're now paying the piper for many years of accrued monopoly effects, it turns out the way our IP law is structured, the rights we've granted corporations to sue people who attempt any kind of reverse engineering etc. all privilege the monopolist and encourage the formation of the monopoly, because the entire legal and regulatory system is designed to juice corporate profits and pesky old laws like the Sherman Act which got in the way have essentially been ignored for decades.

      One really important thing for people to understand is that until there's a serious change to these dynamics, IT WILL GET WORSE. Mac OS will get worse, FOREVER. So will Windows and all other monopolist products. This is why you really need to switch away from them as soon as you can; life will be an order of magnitude more miserable for whoever's still using these products a decade from now. They will just keep on squeezing whoever's left, harder and harder until the heat death of the universe.

      • usefulcat a day ago

        > They're removing features like this because simplifying configurations translates to reduced support costs, and reducing their costs and padding their margin is the name of the game for a monopolist, they believe there's nowhere else for you to go, so they can and will hose you over and over again.

        There may be some truth to that, but I really don't think it's the whole story. Otherwise how do you explain spending so much effort on eye candy like MacOS "liquid glass", or the redesigned settings app? For that matter, why bother with an annual release at all?

        To me, I think it's a pretty obvious case of prioritizing style over substance. For whatever reason, but not to save money. If they really wanted to save money they'd stop with the gratuitous change.

    • Someone a day ago

      > You cannot even select your own notification sound for Messages on MacOS anymore

      I don’t see a UI for it, but when I drop a sound in ~/Library/Sounds (tested with .aif an .m4r; .aiff likely will work, too, looking at ~/System/Library/Sounds) it shows up in the “Sound Effects/Alert sound” pop-up for me.

jaredklewis a day ago

Just a data point, in case it’s useful to anyone: I saw the screenshots and blog posts about Liquid Glass and thought it looked miserable. But then I had a hardware issue and had to upgrade.

I swear after the first 3 days, I’ve only even noticed the new UI maybe a dozen times. If I stop and really pay attention to it, I think the old UI was a bit better, but strangely I don’t really seem to notice the new UI. If it’s worse, I rarely notice.

Then again I spend most of my time in jetbrains IDEs, iterm2, and Firefox (none of which have changed much). So I might be a special case.

amluto a day ago

> It started with the macOS that brought the iOS settings panel.

The ridiculous thing is that Microsoft already made approximately this mistake with the Windows 8 “PC Settings” disaster.

  • abhinavk a day ago

    It's still in process. Today's update (KB5070311) added the following:

    > Keyboard settings for "character repeat delay and rate", and "cursor blink rate", have moved from Control Panel to Settings.

    • do_not_redeem a day ago

      To be fair, Windows 8 only came out in 2012, so they haven't had that much time to finish the settings migration. But they're making good progress. If they keep up this pace of moving 2 settings per month, they should be able to finish by 2053.

      • pjmlp a day ago

        Given how bad Project Reunion went, that is being too positive.

    • jajuuka a day ago

      If the goal was to move everything to Settings, sure. But Settings seems to be for the most common settings the average user will want to look at whereas more detailed options are elsewhere. It's a way to easily funnel users away from more impactful settings to system stability. In this view Windows 11 release solidified that pretty well.

      The character repeat and cursor blink rate settings were already in Settings but it just opened up the older windows forms. This just gives them a new coat of paint by putting them in the Settings app.

  • perryizgr8 a day ago

    Even more ridiculous that the same mistake continues in Windows 11 today!

    • int_19h a day ago

      The fact that neither desktop OS seems to be capable of doing settings right is a damning indictment of the general state of UX across the board.

      • pjmlp a day ago

        Worse, it shows how badly staffed the companies are, with a management that doesn't care about their staff skills.

        From experience, I bet Apple and Microsoft have offshored all their desktop teams.

      • bentcorner a day ago

        Windows went through a pendulum swing of integrating touch (I think they ended up in a place where they expect users to use more of a multi-modal approach instead of touch-only).

        I suspect Mac is going through the same thing right now as ipad is "growing up" and they're trying to reconcile all their UI. I'm a little surprised that Macs have never introduced touch.

socalgal2 a day ago

> The process to allow running applications that are unsigned is just a horrible hack. It feels like a last minute "shove it and move on!".

If you're talking about the process that just says "Foo.app is damaged and can’t be opened." and the only way around that is to manually remove the com.apple.quarantine extended attribute, that's arguably working as intended. Apple doesn't want users to run untrusted apps period. They want only apps approved by them.

As a dev and open source dev I don't like it. But, I can't totally be against it I think. It is safer for some users and experts can learn how to remove the attribute with `xattr -d com.apple.quarantine filename`

  • dilap a day ago

    Saying "Foo.app is damaged" is lying to the user though, which is not nice, and not a good sign, in general, for the health of a company / its culture.

    • socalgal2 a day ago

      Saying it's damage is by design. Apple wants to scare you aware. I agree it feels bad from one POV. That was my initial reaction. I also agree though that steering grandma away from evil apps is good too.

      • array_key_first a day ago

        Part of the reason computer users like your grandma are so helpless is because OS' have devolved to be completely untrustworthy. Everything lies, and error messages now look like "oopsy windows made a fucky! >_<"

        It's no wonder granny has zero confidence in the computer and is always behind.

      • dilap a day ago

        Yeah, by design, of course, but I still think it's bad (& there are plenty of ways to scare grandma without lying to her, if you really need to do that).

        In general I'd contend that the mindest which leads you to believe "we need to lie to our users because they are dumb" isn't conducive to making good software.

      • saagarjha a day ago

        Lying to people is usually bad because they will stop trusting your warnings.

martin82 6 hours ago

I have updated as soon as possible and I if you asked me, I couldn't tell you what is different now. Everything I do on a daily basis still works exactly the same. If there are some weird more rounded corners somewhere now, I don't consciously notice them. The glassy effects look cool but after a week you don't even think about them any more.

JKCalhoun a day ago

> It started with the macOS that brought the iOS settings panel.

I get that Apple would want to unify the user experience across the two devices. But, seriously, iOS settings have been shit since iPhone 1.

They should have fixed iOS instead.

array_key_first a day ago

KDE is so good. Every release they make tangible UX improvements to the point where now most subsystems are almost perfect. There's always been things where I think "oh well that could be better". The notification center, the kickoff menu, krunner, the desktop overview. And then it just got better and better.

  • 10729287 a day ago

    The joy of opening a folder and type / to search a file inside.

VerifiedReports a day ago

"macOS encounters an error or fault, but doesn’t report that to the user, instead just burying it deep in the log."

This is another huge facet of the problem. Not only does it hide glaring problems from the user and prevent him from taking action, but it prevents him from reporting it to Apple for potential redress.

Apple loves to hide information, with the excuse that it's "too scary" for the "average user." This has always been bullshit. If "the average user" is put off by information he receives, he can at least use it to consult someone who isn't.

iOS Mail is a great example. It can utterly fail to access your mail server because of wrong credentials or whatever, but it won't tell you. In fact, it'll claim, "Updated just now." So a day or two goes by and you've missed important work or personal E-mails before you even decide to investigate. This is obviously offensive, because Apple has decided that your work and your communications are less important than hiding their defects... which might not even have been to blame!

When you combine the glaring QA failures piling up with the obnoxious douchebaggery and law-flouting that Apple has engaged in with its app store, it's pretty clear that the company needs a major management housecleaning.

Apple loves to coddle and promote certain pets, who are often incompetent but for some reason curry favor with management. Look at the "Liquid Glass" fiasco and hideous UI regressions in Mac OS and iOS. This is what happens when you put an unqualified packaging designer in charge of UI at a company that's held out as the paragon of "elegant" design. Jony Ive was a pompous hack with one idea... or actually two: 1. "Thinner" 2. Less useful

We had a brief respite with his departure, but now... things might be even worse. And at a time when Windows has been degraded into unredeemable garbage... it's a grim outlook for popular computing.

  • timc3 a day ago

    I disagree with your take on that we should show all information to all users. It’s not always the case that they have someone on hand to help, and users do get anxiety when they do not understand or are presented with too many options. But what macOS should be giving is the full-fat answers and UI is asked for.

    The rest of your comment I can’t argue against at all.

    • VerifiedReports 9 hours ago

      I'm not saying all information all the time. But when something fails, tell the user. Don't lie to them, saying "Everything's working fine!"

      And if you don't show further details up front, provide the user a means to dig them up if he desires to do so. Otherwise, what is he supposed to do?

danans a day ago

> By 2035 I wonder if we'll be all running KDE or WindowMaker and the hell with modern OS GUI

I love Linux, but I doubt that will happen. If anything, by then Linux will be a feature of a workstation OS running in a hypervisor, just like it is with Windows and ChromeOS today.

> The hell with "glass" or "flat" design. Desktop OS should be as forgettable as possible, as it's about having long stints of flow, not giving a feeling of "air" or "play".

There's nothing stopping you from running a Linux desktop with a minimalist tiling window manager - I have for years and found it does exactly what you say.

But it sounds like it's more that you don't like that there aren't many product offerings like that. That is true. Even computers with Linux pre installed use "bouncy" desktop environments like Gnome/KDE by default.

My preference - ChromeOS - comes the closest but is still nowhere near as stripped down as i3 tiling window manager (which I also think is great).

tacker2000 a day ago

Yea im even worse, i was on mojave until last year.

Update frustration has long set in.

Im gonna buy the new macbook pro with the M5 max when it comes out in a couple of months (from an intel 2019) and this will probably be my last mac, im giving them one last chance before i move to Linux.

I dont have big hopes though…

noduerme a day ago

I'm still on Monterey, on a 2021 M1 that works just fine. I'm not buying a new Mac this year specifically to avoid having to spend days dealing with all the potential headaches of updating my dev environments. I hate upgrading. I don't want any of the new stuff. I just want something that works. The first thing I do when I get a new Mac is uninstall every piece of Apple software that can be uninstalled, then use Little Snitch to block all their IP addresses.

That being said, now AWS is forcing all my RDS instances to upgrade to mysql 9 (also: Why???), so I need to get 9 working on my dev box, and tonight I'm up against a wall trying to work through Homebrew issues. There's no way to win.

  • bingo-bongo a day ago

    Huh..? MySQL 9 is not even GA in AWS RDS yet, only in preview: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/MySQL...

    And latest 8.0 and 8.4 is supported at least a year from now.

    • noduerme 5 hours ago

      Aaaannnnd.... I figured out last night that I don't need to go to 9, only to 8.4. Strangely, what version I needed to upgrade to from 8.0 was not stated anywhere in the mass of emails Amazon sent me. I hadn't yet gone on RDS and noticed that 9 is not on the list of options, I was just trying to build 9 on my Mac.

      8.4 won't build in homebrew under Monterey, though, so I'm stuck with 8.3 for my dev stack. I guess I can live with that. I'm dreading the next forced upgrade.

  • balder1991 a day ago

    I think it would be better to just use Docker/Podman at this point?

    • noduerme 5 hours ago

      I was considering that route but was surprised that I couldn't find a version of Docker Desktop that'll run on Monterey anymore.

pjmlp a day ago

> By 2035 I wonder if we'll be all running KDE or WindowMaker and the hell with modern OS GUI.

That is what I wished for back in the 2000's, eventually I went back to Windows starting with Windows 7, because I got fed up with laptop support.

As the main laptop OS, I never stopped having UNIX based systems on servers across many customer projects, or trying out the flavour of the month via local VMs, since hardware virtualization became a commodity.

pbreit a day ago

Tahoe is SOOOO ugly! The huge rounded corners are atrocious. The fonts look terrible. The windows keep snapping, expanding and contracting with no obvious pattern. Yuck.

And iOS's transparencies are disastrous. They make so much of the test illegible.

andrekandre 2 days ago

  > Desktop OS should be as forgettable as possible, as it's about having long stints of flow, not giving a feeling of "air" or "play".
100% agree, though i wonder how much an influence casual users are having on apple's marketing of macos...

its almost as if apple doesnt want to sell "trucks" anymore (as steve would say) and would prefer to morph macos slowly into a sedan like the ipad (cause that is where the money is)

  > By 2035 I wonder if we'll be all running KDE or WindowMaker and the hell with modern OS GUI.
tbh this is probably me in 2026 or 2027 i think...
  • DuperPower 2 days ago

    Windows IS also suffering from macosification

    • keyle a day ago

      no, Windows is suffering from profiteering and corporate malignancy.

exasperaited a day ago

On the other hand, presumably Steve was happy with the insanity of the iOS settings app, where applications had their settings only accessible in another application.

  • JKCalhoun a day ago

    Yeah, it half-ass made sense? Maybe?

    I mean when the apps are small and have just a couple settings, you save having every app having a settings widget that takes you to another panel, etc.

    (But a "Good" iOS app in my mind would still have a widget in the app to take you straight to the correct pane in Settings where you configure it.)

    • ryandrake a day ago

      I kind of like the iOS settings application. If I want to change some settings for an application, I have one place I have to go to find it. I don't need to launch the app and try to guess where their designer decided to stick settings (probably buried deep in a hamburger menu). I don't have to guess whether a dark gray switch on a light gray background is "on" or whether a light gray switch on a dark gray background is "on" because the app's designer thought it would be cool to not use native controls.

      I honestly wish this "central settings" app idea would spread to desktop operating systems.

dilap a day ago

It's basically a "when to rip the band-aid off" type of situation.

Briefly poked around w/ linux again for the first time in years (Omarchy, DHH's tune of Arch + hyprland), and hoo boy, it's come a long way! Nothing like the KDE/Gnome+X jankery of the olden times. Very polished, very slick, very nice.

eduction a day ago

I like “intension” it’s like “intention” + “tension.” The act of planning something, but anxiously.

nurettin a day ago

> By 2035 I wonder if we'll be all running KDE or WindowMaker and the hell with modern OS GUI.

Ironically, it was all downhill since KDE2.

  • prmoustache a day ago

    I think peak KDE was version 3. A project called Trinity Desktop Environment aim to maintain it but I never really tried it for fear of realising those glasses are indeed rose tinted.

    https://www.trinitydesktop.org/

    • TsiCClawOfLight 2 hours ago

      Current Plasma is, in my opinion, the best desktop UX ever made - except maybe for windows 95/98, which is hard to compare on feature set basis.

SheinhardtWigCo 2 days ago

> Steve would roll in his grave.

Steve understood better than anyone that having a finite amount of time to build means you can't please everyone. The vast majority of Apple's customers just do not care about the Keyboard settings UI or the clarity of unusual error messages.

  • wpm 2 days ago

    Users do care they just don't have the words to explain what it is thats frustrating them. Just a silent "I find myself using this less" sort of thing.

    Not for everything, but the excuse of "normies don't give a shit" is a bullshit one.

  • hedora 2 days ago

    I wonder how many care that messages lights up like a Christmas tree on speed on iPadOS, battery life dropped 90%, calculator requires 32 GB of ram, offline maps stranded them in the woods, iOS can no longer keep two apps loaded at once, ocr screenshots broke, the magnifier “flashlight” button no longer fits on the screen, or the ai text suggestions in notes are simultaneously garbage and undeletable.

    Those are just some of the bugs I hit. I’d guess most normal users hit 4-5 problems this upgrade cycle.

    • cgriswald a day ago

      For my side gig I need to quickly take multiple pictures (with my iphone) of subjects that aren’t still or cooperative. This used to work fine. Now the camera just quits with no crash or notice so I think I’m taking pictures but I’m not. Closing the camera app doesn’t disable or stop the camera, I have to wait or reboot. But hey, I can take really cool photos I can view in the Apple Vision I don’t own.