Comment by venturecruelty

Comment by venturecruelty a day ago

6 replies

By 2035, I'm not even sure I'll have a computer. (Sort of a joke, but like, at this rate...)

My current OS X update strategy is: I don't, mostly. I'm a few versions behind, and at this point, I'd rather keep an OS that sort of works and just deal with the script kiddies, then upgrade to an OS that doesn't work and have to deal with my OS vendor.

dijit a day ago

You kid, but you might be onto something.

The majority of users are content with chromebooks, what does that tell you about the requirements of desktop computers today? It tells me that they are just niche professional tools; and professional tools largely suck for UX..

I had an interesting realisation the other day (that's tangentially related): on my iPhone and iPad: I can't access my work emails or chats at all. Yet on my significantly more difficult to secure laptops: no problem.

The mobile platforms have built-in mechanisms for remote attestation. Desktop operating systems do not.

I think as soon as companies realise that an iPad is "good enough" for email/excel/word workers, we'll see an even more precipitous decline of the desktop operating system experience.

  • pr3dr49 18 hours ago

    "I think as soon as companies realise that an iPad is "good enough" for email/excel/word workers, we'll see an even more precipitous decline of the desktop operating system experience."

    This has a ring of SurfacePro as a corporate EUC choice. Quite common these days.

  • Liftyee a day ago

    Maybe my definition of UX is behind the times, but I think professional tools have great UX for their intended users... Professionals.

    Fine grained control, informative error messages, thought out keybinds, all make the system easier to use for experts

    • dijit a day ago

      Professional software is aimed at people who use it day in day out so they’re optimising for a different problem than software that’s aimed at the casual user.

      Intuitiveness is often seen as a outright positive by most people but actually it’s more of a trade off. Often the greatest efficiency is achieved by interfaces that require a bit of learning by the user. The ultimate example of that is command line interfaces which are very powerful and efficient but require you to know what you’re doing and give you relatively little help.

      You’re on the other side of a steep learning curve for a lot of professional software you use. A steep learning curve is bad UX.

usefulcat a day ago

I regularly wait almost a year after a given version of MacOS has been released before upgrading. I don't care about new features, and I already spend all day fixing bugs of my own creation. That leaves very little time for debugging other people's software.

  • bluescrn a day ago

    Meanwhile in Windows world, Win11 has been out for what, 4 years?, and we’re still clinging to Win10