Comment by jaredhallen

Comment by jaredhallen 12 hours ago

26 replies

I'm fully aware this is pedantic, but you can't save 10x. You can pay 1/10. You can save 90%. Your previous costs could have been 10x your current costs. But 10x is more by definition, not less. You can't save it.

PantaloonFlames 12 hours ago

+1 words matter

Clarity of expression is a superpower

I don’t feel it’s pedantic at all.

  • baq 4 hours ago

    Communication is a superpower. You say something and the other person understands.

    Being pedantic about words means you think effective communication is somehow wrong. Be precise, don’t be pedantic.

  • big_maybe 10 hours ago

    People commonly use this expression in everyday conversation, such as, "you could save 10 times as much if you would just shop at Costco." So I agree with OP, their comment is correct but pedantic.

    • happymellon 3 hours ago

      > People commonly

      Your example them was a weasel worded advert that uses meaningless terminology to make something sound big (savings in this case).

      People don't use that expression.

arcastroe 10 hours ago

hmm.. if you reduce latency from one second to a hundred milliseconds, could you celebrate that you've made it 10x faster, or would you have the same quibble there too?

Edit: Thinking about this some more: You could say you are saving 9x [of the new cost], and it would be a correct statement. I believe the error is assuming the reference frame is the previous cost vs the new cost, but since it is not specified, it could be either.

  • thedufer 9 hours ago

    > if you reduce latency from one second to a hundred milliseconds, could you celebrate that you've made it 10x faster

    Yes you can, because speed has units of inverse time and latency has units of time. So it could be correct to say that cutting latency to 1/10 of its original value is equivalent to making it 10x the original speed - that's how inverses work.

    Savings are not, to my knowledge, measured in units of inverse dollars.

jand 10 hours ago

This becomes much clearer with a balance sheet in front of you.

What is saving? _Spending less_, that's all. Saving generates no income, it makes you go broke slower.

Independent of the price or the product, you can never save more than factor 1.0 (or 100%).

Wasn't there a guy on TV who wanted to make prices go down 1500%? Same BS, different flavor.

veqq 11 hours ago

In English, x or time(s) after a number marks a "unit" used by various verbs. A 10x increase. Increase by 10x. Go up 10x. Some of these verbs are negative like decrease or save. "Save 10x" is the same as "divide by 10". Four times less, 5 times smaller etc. are long attested.

  • happymellon 4 hours ago

    Thats not how English works.

    Saved 10x would imply there was an amount being saved that they multipled.

  • adammarples 11 hours ago

    No, x literally means multiply. It doesn't somehow also mean divide. They should use the percent sign, it's what it is for. 10x my costs means 10 x mycost, it's literally an equation

    • veqq 10 hours ago

      It's just inversion, like 2 to the power of 2 or 2 to the power of negative 2. These negative words inverse it just the same. You may dislike it, but millions of people have spoken this way for a long time.

      > x literally means multiply

      And some use the dot operator or even 2(3) or (2)(3). When programming, we tend to use *.

  • jaredhallen 11 hours ago

    Agree to disagree.

    • ffsm8 6 hours ago

      It's basically multiplication with fractions, just like you get 1/4 from 1/2 * 1/2, which is once again a multiplication that turns into division

      I agree that it's a suboptimal and click baity way to phrase it though...

      • imp0cat 4 hours ago

        Exactly, it's multiplication.

        Example: He was saving $10 every month before the change. Then he switched and now he is saving 10 x $10, ie $100 every month.

        But that's not the case here, right? And that's why the parent post is correct.

      • [removed] 5 hours ago
        [deleted]
gerdesj 11 hours ago

  Cost of item = 10

  First discounted cost of item = 9
  => First saving = 1

  Second discounted cost of item = 6
  => Second saving = 4

  Second saving is 4x first saving.

  (Edit - formatting)
  • jaredhallen 11 hours ago

    But that's 4x the savings compared to another saving. I suppose you've upped the pedantry and are technically correct, but that's a pretty narrow use case and not the one used in the article.

[removed] 11 hours ago
[deleted]
lblack00 9 hours ago

Colloquially, differences in powers of 10 would be better stated as differences of orders of magnitude.

rr808 10 hours ago

I could care less.

immibis 11 hours ago

Consider it as getting 10x the resources for the same price - that is, the resource-to-price ratio is 10x. Except you don't need 10x the resources so you choose to get 1x the resources for 0.1x the price instead.

  • jaredhallen 11 hours ago

    Sure. Getting 10x the resources for the same price is another valid way to express the thought. Saving 10x isn't, though.