Comment by danabramov

Comment by danabramov a day ago

9 replies

What questions do you have about AT? I agree its docs are mostly “bad” and hard to understand. I find the actual tech approachable so happy to answer more concrete questions.

Tools like http://pdsls.dev in particular can be helpful to see how things fit together.

hugs a day ago

i think it really is as simple as boiling it down into a doc that looks like nip-1 and saying, "this is the absolute minimum amount you need to understand and implement to start sending messages on an AT-based network." -- not from a user perspective, but from an average developer perspective.

i know eventually i'd need to implement a ton more than the absolute bare minimum, but my gut-feeling "average developer brain" says nostr's absolute minimum feels smaller that AT's absolute minimum. i guess i'm looking for an AT doc for devs that shows the absolute minimum for creating a client that is equally approachable as NIP-1.

  • danabramov a day ago

    Thanks, that’s helpful. I’ll see if I can write something in that spirit later.

    • hugs a day ago

      thanks. also, fwiw, i'm also a very a happy AT user (@hugs.bsky.social) besides also being a happy nostr user.

      i appreciate bsky's focus on user ux and community building and look forward to seeing more sharing of ideas between nostr and AT.

      edit to add: to nerd-snipe my brain into wanting to make stuff with AT (or any future protocol) is to focus on a quick-start or tutorial showing the absolute minimal client to send one message.

      once i can do that... i'm ready to learn all the rest of the vocabulary and server-side stuff, but not until i can send one simple message from a barely functional minimal client.

      • danabramov a day ago

        Would it be ok to use a library or is the requirement to keep it to raw primitives like curl?