mgraczyk 13 hours ago

No it isn't

Suppose you were running a computation that requires doing 33,000 multiplies. Later you find a way to do the same computation using only 1,000 multiples

That's basically what happened here

  • sameermanek 12 hours ago

    [flagged]

    • quantummagic 12 hours ago

      You've been here 15 years and made hardly any comments. Why do you feel so strongly about this now? Wasn't there a way you could have at least made it more constructive?

    • [removed] 12 hours ago
      [deleted]
  • playforclaude 12 hours ago

    33,000 multiples - (33 * 33,000 multiples) = -1056000 multiples

    • mgraczyk 12 hours ago

      Reducing something 33x means to make it 33 times smaller. It's a common way of saying this in English

      • globnomulous 11 hours ago

        "Reduce by 97%" is simple, clear, and accurate.

        "Reduce 33x" and "make 33x smaller" are ambiguous, unclear, and inaccurate. Is something that's "33x smaller" or "reduced 33x" 1/33 of the original total or is it 1/34? The question can't be answered in the absence of more information.

        These are common expressions, sure. They're also awful, belonging to the same category of error as:

        * The price is expensive

        * It's a good-quality piece

        * All but one of my friends speaks like this.

        * Here's an author whom we know cares about language.

        * As well, this is how some people write.

        That is, they're the errors of a normal native speaker.

        • mgraczyk 11 hours ago

          It's 1/33, I don't see how it could be 1/34. Nobody would ever make that mistake and it wouldn't matter, close enough