Comment by mgraczyk

Comment by mgraczyk 12 hours ago

7 replies

No it isn't

Suppose you were running a computation that requires doing 33,000 multiplies. Later you find a way to do the same computation using only 1,000 multiples

That's basically what happened here

sameermanek 12 hours ago

[flagged]

  • quantummagic 11 hours ago

    You've been here 15 years and made hardly any comments. Why do you feel so strongly about this now? Wasn't there a way you could have at least made it more constructive?

  • [removed] 12 hours ago
    [deleted]
playforclaude 12 hours ago

33,000 multiples - (33 * 33,000 multiples) = -1056000 multiples

  • mgraczyk 12 hours ago

    Reducing something 33x means to make it 33 times smaller. It's a common way of saying this in English

    • globnomulous 11 hours ago

      "Reduce by 97%" is simple, clear, and accurate.

      "Reduce 33x" and "make 33x smaller" are ambiguous, unclear, and inaccurate. Is something that's "33x smaller" or "reduced 33x" 1/33 of the original total or is it 1/34? The question can't be answered in the absence of more information.

      These are common expressions, sure. They're also awful, belonging to the same category of error as:

      * The price is expensive

      * It's a good-quality piece

      * All but one of my friends speaks like this.

      * Here's an author whom we know cares about language.

      * As well, this is how some people write.

      That is, they're the errors of a normal native speaker.

      • mgraczyk 11 hours ago

        It's 1/33, I don't see how it could be 1/34. Nobody would ever make that mistake and it wouldn't matter, close enough