sneak 3 days ago

This was conveniently omitted from both TFA as well as the linked “how I got here” post.

Where did you learn this?

  • greglansky 3 days ago
    • sneak 3 days ago

      This is an PDF of a bad court decision about an illegal search; he was not convicted of harming anyone. It contains no evidence of him harming anyone.

      • greglansky 3 days ago

        If police can determine there is probable cause they can immediately search without a warrant. It contains strong evidence of him committing harm directly to his gf at the time. It does not contain a legal decision or conviction, but that's not a lack of evidence - the report's existence itself is by definition evidence.

        • sneak 3 days ago

          That’s false. PC needs to be taken to a judge for a search warrant.

          What you are probably thinking of is what is called the “exigent circumstances” warrant exception, and it was misapplied here by over-zealous police who violated his rights.

          There is no evidence to support that the injuries sustained by the woman in his apartment were caused by him, according to that document.

  • keepamovin 3 days ago

    I’m basing my view on what he said in the blog. Where is this said?