Comment by sneak

Comment by sneak 3 days ago

5 replies

This was conveniently omitted from both TFA as well as the linked “how I got here” post.

Where did you learn this?

greglansky 3 days ago
  • sneak 3 days ago

    This is an PDF of a bad court decision about an illegal search; he was not convicted of harming anyone. It contains no evidence of him harming anyone.

    • greglansky 3 days ago

      If police can determine there is probable cause they can immediately search without a warrant. It contains strong evidence of him committing harm directly to his gf at the time. It does not contain a legal decision or conviction, but that's not a lack of evidence - the report's existence itself is by definition evidence.

      • sneak 3 days ago

        That’s false. PC needs to be taken to a judge for a search warrant.

        What you are probably thinking of is what is called the “exigent circumstances” warrant exception, and it was misapplied here by over-zealous police who violated his rights.

        There is no evidence to support that the injuries sustained by the woman in his apartment were caused by him, according to that document.

keepamovin 3 days ago

I’m basing my view on what he said in the blog. Where is this said?