Comment by philjohn

Comment by philjohn 3 days ago

17 replies

Yep - turns out the Nordic countries had it right all along. When you focus on rehabilitation and not just punishment you get lower redicivism rates. Who would have thought it?

gabeio 3 days ago

> When you focus on rehabilitation and not just punishment

From a book I recently read on the subject they seem not just to focus on rehab and lack of punishment. If there are disputes with others within the facilities the ones in the dispute must sit down and talk through their issues and find a resolution. This helps ingrain proper anger management & helps re-acclimate them to normal society where violence is rarely the best option. And it makes a ton of sense, if they never are taught how to talk out their issues they will go back to how they have handled those issues all along.

  • philjohn 3 days ago

    To be honest, that could certainly be filed under "rehabilitation". Giving people the skills they need to be productive members of society is definitely in that wheelhouse.

    • gabeio 3 days ago

      Fair I was thinking of the substance abuse definition, and hadn’t included enough into that word.

  • koolba 3 days ago

    [flagged]

    • const_cast 3 days ago

      Ugh, homogeneous population is overrated. When you remove axis of discrimination from humans they just go down a level or too and use that as the basis for prejudice.

    • wizzwizz4 3 days ago

      There's no such thing as a "homogeneous population". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realistic_conflict_theory#Robb...

      > From the study, they determined that because the groups were created to be approximately equal, individual differences are not necessary or responsible for intergroup conflict to occur.

      > Lutfy Diab repeated the experiment with 18 boys from Beirut. The 'Blue Ghost' and 'Red Genies' groups each contained 5 Christians and 4 Muslims. Fighting soon broke out, not between the Christians and Muslims but between the Red and Blue groups.

      • exoverito 3 days ago

        Continuum fallacy. Might as well claim that there's no such thing as blue or violet, since there's a gradient between them.

        Also you can establish homogeneity using genetic analysis such as the fixation index. Unsurprisingly, Swedes and Finns are extremely closely related.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_index#Autosomal_genet...

        There are many possible metrics to measure heterogeneity, such as linguistic and religious diversity, variations in value systems, etc.

    • presentation 3 days ago

      I don't have evidence to say that it is irrelevant, but people love using homogeneity as a cope for being unwilling to try things to improve the status quo. Hate this argument.

      • wizzwizz4 3 days ago

        I've mostly seem them use it as an excuse to try to make ethnostates.

    • kurikuri 3 days ago

      They were likely in a homogeneous population when they committed the crime that got them there in the first place, so that confounder might not matter much at all.

    • shrubble 3 days ago

      Yes, in the sense that higher social trust, enabled by homogeneity is helpful in many ways. Robert Putnam among others wrote about it; Putnam wrote “Bowling Alone”.

GardenLetter27 3 days ago

It depends on the crime IMO.

I live in Sweden and now the gangs are recruiting children because they don't get sentenced even for murder (maybe 2 years max).

The other side of prison is keeping the public safe - you also have zero recidivism with the Bukele approach.