Comment by HdS84

Comment by HdS84 3 months ago

One of our managers uses Ai to summarize everything. Too bad it missed important caveats for an offer. Well, we burned an all nighters to correct the offer, but he did not read twenty pages but one...

namaria 3 months ago

I don't know if this is the case but be careful about shielding management from the consequences of their bad choices at your expense. It all but guarantees it will get worse.

Reply View 16 replies

kortilla 3 months ago

Letting a thing implode that you could prevent is a missed opportunity for advancement and a risk to your career because you will be on a failing team.
The smarter move is to figure out how to fix it for the company while getting visibility for it.

Reply View | 10 replies
- bluefirebrand 3 months ago
  
  > Letting a thing implode that you could prevent is a missed opportunity for advancement
  No matter how many times I bail out my managers it seems that my career has never really benefit from it
  I've only ever received significant bumps to salary or job title by changing jobs
  
  Reply View | 1 reply
  
  kortilla 3 months ago
  
  That means you’re not getting visibility for it. When I say “get visibility”, it means to your manager’s boss and peers.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
- stavros 3 months ago
  
  I don't know what your experience is, but mine is the opposite. Nobody ever notices people who put out fires, and it's hard to should "hey guys! There's a fire here that John started, I'm putting it out!" without looking like a jerk for outing John.
  
  Reply View | 5 replies
  
  HPsquared 3 months ago
  
  Fewer still notice the fire-preventer.
  
  Reply View | 4 replies
- namaria 3 months ago
  
  You are right. I don't think the only alternative to shielding management from the consequences of their bad choices is letting things implode and going down with the ship.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
- spookie 3 months ago
  
  yup, an employee is more than just a gear, better keep the motor running than explode along with the other parts.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
bluGill 3 months ago

Management should be hiring lawyers for those details anyway...

Reply View | 4 replies
- HdS84 3 months ago
  
  Wasn't even legal but concerned the scope of the offer. Nuance, but nuance can be important. Like "rework the service and add minor festures" VS "slightly rework and do major features" - this affected the direction of our offer a lot.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
- namaria 3 months ago
  
  Yes. Reliable domain experts are very important.
  
  Reply View | 2 replies
  
  shermantanktop 3 months ago
  
  Should I mention that yesterday I just saw a diagram with a box that said “Legal Review LLM”?
  
  Reply View | 1 reply
  
  namaria 3 months ago
  
  Maybe you should point them to the news stories about that sort of thing blowing up spectacularly in court. Or maybe you could just let them learn that by themselves.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies

BeetleB 3 months ago

Did he pull all nighters to fix it? If not, it wasn't "too bad" for him. I doubt he'll change his behavior.

Reply View 0 replies

pjc50 3 months ago

Where's the IBM slide about "a machine cannot be held accountable, therefore a machine should never make a management decision"?

Of course, often it's quite hard to hold management accountable either.

Reply View 1 reply

checkyoursudo 3 months ago

Isn't a solution to assign vicarious liability to whomever approves the use of the decision-making machine?

Reply View | 0 replies