Comment by brain5ide

Comment by brain5ide 21 hours ago

11 replies

View on Hacker News

Are we talking about structural things or about individual perspective things?

At individual perspective - AI is useful as a helper to achieve your generative tasks. I'd argue against analytic tasks, but YMMV.

At the societal perspective, e.g. you as individual can not trus anything the society has produced, because it's likely some AI generated bullshit.

Some time ago, if you were not trusting a source, you could build your understanding by evaluating a plurality of sources and perspectives and get to the answer in a statistical manner. Now every possible argument can be stretched in any possible dimension and your ability to build a conclusion has been ripped away.

walterbell 21 hours ago

> build your understanding by evaluating a plurality of sources and perspectives and get to the answer in a statistical manner

A few thousand years of pre-LLM primary sources remain available for evaluation by humans and LLMs.

Reply View 10 replies
  • coryrc 21 hours ago

    You and I remember pre-AI famous works. "Hey, I'm pretty sure Odysseus took a long time to get home". Somebody goes and prints 50 different AI-generated versions of the _Odyssey_, how are future generations supposed to know which is real and which is fake?

    Reply View 7 replies
    • walterbell 20 hours ago

      > how are future generations supposed to know which is real

      Reality/truth/history has always been an expensive pursuit in the face of evolving pollutants.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • coryrc 7 hours ago

        That's definitely true. History has been thoroughly manufactured by humans. Naively, I thought the storage of computers might preserve first-hand accounts forever; it might, but it might not be discernible.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • noosphr 20 hours ago

      This is literally how the Odyssey was passed down for the 2000 years before the printing press was invented.

      Every work had multiple versions. All versions were different. Some versions were diametrically opposed to others.

      Have a look at Bible scholarship to see just _how_ divergent texts can become by nothing more than scribe errors.

      Reply View 4 replies
      • coryrc 7 hours ago

        They were real because they were made by people all along. Now you can't tell.

        I think you're right my analogy is imperfect. I'm only human (or am I? :P)

        Reply View 0 replies
      • samtheprogram 20 hours ago

        99.9999999% sure that was their point? Why else would they bring up that particular work?

        Reply View 2 replies