Comment by walterbell

Comment by walterbell 5 days ago

11 replies

> build your understanding by evaluating a plurality of sources and perspectives and get to the answer in a statistical manner

A few thousand years of pre-LLM primary sources remain available for evaluation by humans and LLMs.

coryrc 5 days ago

You and I remember pre-AI famous works. "Hey, I'm pretty sure Odysseus took a long time to get home". Somebody goes and prints 50 different AI-generated versions of the _Odyssey_, how are future generations supposed to know which is real and which is fake?

  • walterbell 5 days ago

    > how are future generations supposed to know which is real

    Reality/truth/history has always been an expensive pursuit in the face of evolving pollutants.

    • coryrc 5 days ago

      That's definitely true. History has been thoroughly manufactured by humans. Naively, I thought the storage of computers might preserve first-hand accounts forever; it might, but it might not be discernible.

  • noosphr 5 days ago

    This is literally how the Odyssey was passed down for the 2000 years before the printing press was invented.

    Every work had multiple versions. All versions were different. Some versions were diametrically opposed to others.

    Have a look at Bible scholarship to see just _how_ divergent texts can become by nothing more than scribe errors.

    • coryrc 5 days ago

      They were real because they were made by people all along. Now you can't tell.

      I think you're right my analogy is imperfect. I'm only human (or am I? :P)

    • samtheprogram 5 days ago

      99.9999999% sure that was their point? Why else would they bring up that particular work?

      • burnished 5 days ago

        Because they thought it was an ancient and unchanging text.