Comment by sam_lowry_

Comment by sam_lowry_ 2 months ago

1 reply

1. It breaks my heart to see indie dev spirit die even on HN.

2. it's brittle and too automated to my taste. There may be false positives that I'd fait to review if it was too automated.

3. There should be a very limited set of passwords for your main assets. For instance, one for infrastructure, one for a password manager, one for the safe at home. And they should never be rotated. They are meant to be ingrained in muscle memory and stay with you for many years.

rstuart4133 a month ago

> There may be false positives that I'd fait to review if it was too automated.

On my little vps fail2ban has added over 23,000 ipv4's to it's f2b-ssh ipset. There is no way I'm reviewing that manually.

For what it's worth I don't allow passwords, so there is not a lot of additional security to be gained from fail2ban. I don't use it for that reason. I use it because 100's of login attempts brings my very cheap vps with bugger all RAM to it's knees. I don't particularly care that it runs like a dog when it's on its knees, but the OOM killer taking out the services I actually use it for is a step too far.

> it's brittle and too automated to my taste.

That problem largely disappears when you get rid of passwords. Fail2ban triggers on failures, and allowing passwords means you must tolerate some failures. People don't mistype public keys.