Comment by rstuart4133

Comment by rstuart4133 a month ago

0 replies

> There may be false positives that I'd fait to review if it was too automated.

On my little vps fail2ban has added over 23,000 ipv4's to it's f2b-ssh ipset. There is no way I'm reviewing that manually.

For what it's worth I don't allow passwords, so there is not a lot of additional security to be gained from fail2ban. I don't use it for that reason. I use it because 100's of login attempts brings my very cheap vps with bugger all RAM to it's knees. I don't particularly care that it runs like a dog when it's on its knees, but the OOM killer taking out the services I actually use it for is a step too far.

> it's brittle and too automated to my taste.

That problem largely disappears when you get rid of passwords. Fail2ban triggers on failures, and allowing passwords means you must tolerate some failures. People don't mistype public keys.