garbagewoman 5 hours ago

The supreme court says a lot of things.

  • airstrike 5 hours ago

    So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.

    • Spivak 4 hours ago

      Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.

      It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.

      • airstrike 3 hours ago

        By definition, the Supreme Court's decision _is_ the canonical interpretation. Whether you disagree with the decision has no bearing on the matter.

        And of course it makes sense, because the legal system was created by the very laws it upholds. If you think it should be different, then you'll have to convince a lot of people to change a lot of laws and probably parts of the US constitution

  • HDThoreaun 3 hours ago

    And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.

cute_boi 3 hours ago

Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased.

  • monocularvision an hour ago

    What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?