airstrike 5 hours ago

So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.

Reply View 2 replies
  • Spivak 4 hours ago

    Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.

    It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • airstrike 3 hours ago

      By definition, the Supreme Court's decision _is_ the canonical interpretation. Whether you disagree with the decision has no bearing on the matter.

      And of course it makes sense, because the legal system was created by the very laws it upholds. If you think it should be different, then you'll have to convince a lot of people to change a lot of laws and probably parts of the US constitution

      Reply View 0 replies
HDThoreaun 3 hours ago

And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.

Reply View 0 replies