Comment by bluGill

Comment by bluGill 2 days ago

18 replies

View on Hacker News

A good algorithm is a good thing. However what a good algorithm is for me is often different from what it is for those who maintain them. Outrage gets attention and sometimes it is needed, but there is a level of too much, and also a lot of outrage unfairly represents the issues and so it makes me mad even though if I understood the details I wouldn't be mad just concerned.

I want an algorithm that surfaces things of interest to me, then says "you have seen it all, go outside" (with an option of if I'm confined to a hospital bed to go on). Algorithm maintainers want me to keep scrolling for more ad dollars.

ndriscoll a day ago

> you have seen it all, go outside

Or "you've seen it all. Bored? Click here to let your friends know you're looking for something to do/see who else is bored". Or "Bored? X needs volunteers!" Or some other positive suggestion to try to prevent a "eh guess I'll doomscroll something else" reaction.

Reply View 4 replies
  • gleenn a day ago

    That would be such a killer feature. And it could find other friends in the area and that are also free. Not like Meta doesn't have some kind of model for all that data already probably.

    Reply View 3 replies
    • miah_ a day ago

      Yes. I'd love to find other nerds into retro computing, UNIX, and pottery in my area without wading into groups or joining a forum. They know everything about me, match me up with some people I'd most likely get along with!

      Reply View 1 reply
      • _DeadFred_ a day ago

        Isn't this what ancient local BBSs did? Back in the 90's when in my teens/twenties that was how I found interesting local groups of people/organic raves (i.e. not ones organized by promoters) outside my established circles in Santa Cruz/the bay area. Also some of the most uncomfortable/awkward unsocial/nerdfest social evenings so not everything was a hit.

        I'm guessing that there are now Discords that fill this niche?

        Reply View 0 replies
    • Terr_ a day ago

      > That would be such a killer feature.

      "Alice, what if we made a button that improved overall human wellbeing, while somewhat reducing our ad-revenue and lowering the engagement-metrics we use to sell shares to investors?"

      "*sigh* We've been over this, Bob: We only build features for customers--not cattle."

      Reply View 0 replies
WantonQuantum a day ago

A long long time ago before reddit, facebook, digg, twitter, etc, there was usenet. It worked a bit like reddit but subreddits were called news groups.

There were many front ends for usenet, called news readers.

My favourite was "nn" short for "no news".

It showed you posts in groups you're subscribed to, allowed you to post comments, etc.

When you had finished getting up to date it would EXIT and print:

No news. (Is good news)

Reply View 2 replies
  • grumblepeet a day ago

    Ha! I had forgotten that message.Thank you for reminding me. I used to read comp.lang.lisp for the extensive and increasingly bizarre flame wars and for the wider philosophical discussions. Eventually I got to the point where I thought "OK I'm done now" and left and never went back.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • RalfWausE 19 hours ago

    The cool thing is: Its still there!

    Yeah, it may be not as populated as in the 80s to mid 90s, but there are still enough active groups in usenet to waste uncounted hours every day...

    Reply View 0 replies
8organicbits a day ago

You should read about OPML blogrolls [1], they are gaining traction in this space. Personally, I like the idea of manually exploring recommendations, so I built a browsable index [2]. But you can crawl the these as well and build all sorts of recommendations engines.

[1] https://opml.org/blogroll.opml

[2] https://alexsci.com/rss-blogroll-network/discover/feed-c550c...

Reply View 1 reply
EvanAnderson a day ago

I'd like to see an RSS item-level recommendation / discovery algorithm driven by recommendations made by a cohort of people who have similar likes to me. I wish there was a standards-based to publish a stream of my "likes" from my feed reader, and to "consume" the "likes" of others. When I add somebody's blog to my feed reader I'd expect it to pick up their "likes" (much like how people used to have a "blog roll" on their own site) and begin to consume the "feeds" from the sites they "like". It reminds me a bit of PHP's "web of trust".

Hacker News, arguably, functions in this capacity for me now. The cohort is the entire population (since we all see the same item rankings), though.

Reply View 2 replies
  • lonk11 a day ago

    What you are describing is similar to how https://LinkLonk.com works (my side project) - when you "like" a link you get connected to the RSS feeds that posted that link and other users that also liked it. Then you get content from feeds and users that you are connected to. The more links in common you have with a feed or a user the more weight their other links have.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • mjmsmith 16 hours ago

    Do any of the web-based readers offer discovery based on matching your RSS list to other users' lists? Mine (Feedbin) doesn't, but I'd like it as an opt-in option.

    Reply View 0 replies
nialv7 2 days ago

You said what I wanted to say.

I think there is a niche market for tools that allow individuals to train their own recommendation systems.

Reply View 0 replies
lrem a day ago

You seem to be behind on English as spoken. From what I can reconstruct:

Algorithm (n) - a secretive set of systems, procedures and data that Big Tech uses to maliciously manipulate unsuspecting general public. Example usage: "Algorithm-free music discovery app for DJs"

I'm not joking, that example usage is taken from a live example.

Reply View 0 replies
marcus_holmes a day ago

There's been some conversation on Mastodon (and here) about its lack of algorithm

I really prefer my feed with no algorithm. I really like that it's just ordered by when it was posted, and if someone spams too much I'll remove them, and if my feed gets too much I'll curate it down a bit.

Reply View 0 replies
tolerance 2 days ago

> I want an algorithm that surfaces things of interest to me, then says "you have seen it all, go outside" (with an option of if I'm confined to a hospital bed to go on).

[Acquire, or Employ your] good taste, sensibility & discipline.

Edit: For the record, "Employ your..." assumed that it if "good taste, sensibility & discipline" was not already acquired, it was already possessed and who I was responding to is able to put it to use.

Let those characteristics be your algorithm...or rather, your natural heuristic for living fair.

Has good faith met the end that it's said that chivalry saw?

Reply View 0 replies