Comment by jstummbillig

Comment by jstummbillig 4 days ago

37 replies

View on Hacker News

> They're battery acid poured on the human psyche.

At least as far as kids are concerned, current evidence does not readily support this common believe.

Sabine Hossenfelder writes: "The idea that social media causes children mental health distress is plausible, but unfortunately it isn’t true. Trouble is, if you read what the press has written about it, you wouldn’t know. Scientists have described it as a “moral panic” that isn’t backed by data, which has been promoted most prominently by one man: Jonathan Haidt."

Video for more insight, if you are interested: https://youtu.be/V95Vg2pVlo0

GeoAtreides 4 days ago

Sabine Hossenfelder is a physicist, she's not an expert on mental health. She might be right, she might be wrong, but she isn't a source of truth.

The chart with the number of suicides for children going up is not a moral panic, but a grim reality.

Reply View 9 replies
  • noboostforyou 4 days ago

    > she's not an expert on mental health. She might be right, she might be wrong, but she isn't a source of truth.

    It's FB but for the purpose of studying effects of social media on mental health it should suffice:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-tox...

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/sep/14/facebook-...

    https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-internal-report-sho...

    https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/how-social-medias-toxic-conten...

    Reply View 0 replies
  • zeroonetwothree 4 days ago

    Suicides were higher in the 1980s than now. I’m pretty sure we didn’t have any apps back then.

    Reply View 1 reply
  • xNeil 4 days ago

    The moral panic is social media being the reason for the suicides going up, not the fact that suicides are going up in itself.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • jstummbillig 4 days ago

    And correlation is not causation. If you disagree with her interpretation (it's mostly just presentation, really) of the data, feel free to be specific. Attacking the person is, as always, bad form and lame.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • GeoAtreides 4 days ago

      I haven't attacked Sabine, it was OP who used her as some some sort of authority in children mental health.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • NoGravitas 4 days ago

    Right, but correlation does not equal causation. Kids are also increasingly aware that they live in a neoliberal hellworld, and their chances of maintaining the lifestyles their parents and grandparents had are slim to none.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • grapesodaaaaa 4 days ago

      I’m losing family members to conspiracy theory YouTube channels.

      The crackpots had a greater barrier to transmit back in the day. They had to get an FCC license or know someone with a radio station. Even then reach was limited unless you could reach a deal to transmit nationwide.

      I personally believe our brains are primed on some level to buy into this stuff. It’s very hard to overcome.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • noboostforyou 4 days ago

        I agree completely, social media is essentially a dopamine addiction. Steve Jobs had an apt quote regarding what you said "our brains are primed on some level to buy into this stuff."

        > When you’re young, you look at television and think, There’s a conspiracy. The networks have conspired to dumb us down. But when you get a little older, you realize that’s not true. The networks are in business to give people exactly what they want. That’s a far more depressing thought. Conspiracy is optimistic! You can shoot the bastards! We can have a revolution! But the networks are really in business to give people what they want. It’s the truth.

        Reply View 0 replies
mola 4 days ago

So Hossenfelder is now a psychiatrist and a sociologist?

bah, I really dislike "scientist influencers". She isn't versed in the subject, she's no better than Haidt.

Reply View 4 replies
  • zorked 4 days ago

    From that point of view, the press and journalism should not exist.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • zeroonetwothree 4 days ago

    “Sociologist” is more of an anti-qualification. In any case let’s not rely on appeals to authority. I think we are intelligent enough to judge the evidence ourselves.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • stronglikedan 4 days ago

    No, but she doesn't have to be in this context. She's a very capable critical thinker who knows how to do very thorough research, which is all someone has to be to determine that there is, in fact, no data to support the claims.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • in3d 4 days ago

      She’s not a capable critical thinker, quite the opposite, in fact. Completely unimpressive.

      Reply View 0 replies
tedivm 4 days ago

They might not be causing literally mental health issues, but they're certainly radicalizing a lot of young folks into some really toxic behaviors and beliefs.

Reply View 0 replies
persedes 4 days ago

I don't really want to watch a video, but do you have a write up somewhere? The last rebuttal I've read (I think from the books that kill podcast) basically dismissed Haidts claims by saying that the increase in anxiety related disorders was due to increased self reporting. And the podcast seems to have ignored the graph on the next page in Haidts book, which showed a correlated increase in emergency room admissions due to anxiety related disorders.

Reply View 0 replies
lc9er 4 days ago

> Sabine Hossenfelder

Why would a physicist's opinion on mental health carry any weight?

Reply View 0 replies
paulddraper 4 days ago

What is causing the record level of mental health disorders in children?

Reply View 18 replies
  • llm_nerd 4 days ago

    In 1990 there were zero identified exoplants. Now there are 4000+. It isn't that there is the creation of lots of new planets, but that we started looking for them in earnest, and had the means to identify them.

    Being diagnosed is the likely reason there is an explosion in mental health disorders. We go to lengths to apply a diagnostic label on every child. The massive variation in humans means that a huge portion are going to fall to the sides of the curve on all sorts of gradients. Older HNers will remember having a wide variety of kids among their cohorts, with "nerds", depressives, the hyperactive, the super driven and focused, and the manic depressives, etc, but likely zero were actually diagnosed in any way. Now you could apply a diagnoses on literally all of them.

    This isn't judgmental, and it's good to know what people are dealing with, and to offer treatment or medication where possible.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • Jean-Papoulos 4 days ago

    Actually getting kids tested for them.

    Reply View 3 replies
  • Gormo 4 days ago

    Are children actually experiencing mental health disorders at a higher rate, or are we just classifying pre-existing variations in personality as behavior as mental health disorders at a higher rate?

    Reply View 6 replies
    • stevenAthompson 4 days ago

      The DSM used to break mental health disorders down into what it called the multi-axial system. Axis 1 being the least impacting diseases, and axis 5 the most severe. At some point we had so many disorders that more than 50% of the population was seen to have Axis 1 or higher mental health disorders. This meant that more of the population was regarded as mentally ill than were considered "healthy."

      Rather than accept that >50% of the population being classified as mentally ill might be a sign we were thinking about things in a backwards way they just got rid of the multi-axial system in DSM 5.

      Problem solved.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • aqme28 4 days ago

      I agree with your skepticism on this, but youth suicide rates have been steadily climbing. Unless we were misclassifying suicide, it seems like there is a rising mental health crisis.

      Reply View 4 replies
      • llm_nerd 4 days ago

        Teen suicide rates have been falling in Europe and most of the world. North America has edged back up to 1990 levels, and it's largely alone in that trend.

        Europe and the rest of the world has social media as well. And of course 1990 didn't have social media.

        There are a lot of reasons teens can feel hopeless, and I think the hyper-partisan political atmosphere / circus, coupled with the existential crisis and very real career crisis caused by AI, at least in the common understanding, the rapid heating of the Earth, etc. I would attribute all of those as dramatically more likely to lead a child to seek an out more than social media, even if the latter is much easier to blame.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • Gormo 4 days ago

        What skepticism did I express? There are two possible explanations for the value of a metric changing: either the thing being measured has changed, or the methodology of conducting the measurement has changed. I honestly do not know which is the case here.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • zeroonetwothree 4 days ago

        Suicide rates were higher in the 80s

        Reply View 1 reply
        • arkh 4 days ago

          And it got lower before going back up.

          You could use the exact same argument with the Earth temperature: it was higher 50 millions year ago.

          Reply View 0 replies
  • ta_011525 4 days ago

    [flagged]

    Reply View 3 replies
    • tokioyoyo 4 days ago

      All fairly US specific problems, but the problem with the youth is global. The biggest common factor among kids worldwide is prevalence of phones and social media in their lives.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • voidUpdate 4 days ago

      > The social championing and normalization of transgenderism (literally a disorder)

      The "disorder" is gender dysphoria. The "cure" for that is being able to live as your chosen gender, eg being transgender. People aren't trying to "spread" it anyway, what gave you that idea? All the trans people I've met haven't been trying to convince other people to be trans, they're giving people advice when they need it. You cant make someone transgender just by trying to convince them they are if they aren't

      Reply View 1 reply
      • Rooster61 4 days ago

        In my experience, most are terrified to make the change but do it anyways. A non trivial number of the general populace will loathe you on sight the second that change is made publicly. That'd scare me, too

        Reply View 0 replies