Comment by kzalesak

Comment by kzalesak 3 days ago

13 replies

I think that the biggest advantage of the spreadsheet is that it can be modified easily, even democratically and also on the go. No website offers that kind of ease of use for _adding_ information

acidburnNSA 3 days ago

You may be right, but it's still an indictment of the web. After all, the first browser was an HTML editor as well as viewer.

_Algernon_ 3 days ago

Wikipedia is literally a website that does this and has existed for >2 decades at this point.

  • wruza 3 days ago

    ### Regular _users_ cannot edit [Wikipedia](<url>)

    • _Algernon_ 3 days ago

      Refusal to learn != can't

      • wruza 3 days ago

        Learning is the last thing they want to do in a situation like “I want to update a document about losing homes”, and among the end of the to do list in general. One can argue as much as they want how it’s people’s fault, but the next catastrophe will create more google sheets and whatsapp groups and zero wikis and forum threads.

        I believe that developers could bridge this gap easily, if they weren’t in the denial about their own UI/UX issues themselves.

  • IanCal 3 days ago

    Yes, let me just go pop my personal contents and insurance details on wikipedia as myself and my family track, update and modify the structure of the page.

    • _Algernon_ 3 days ago

      Not sure why you feel justified in this level of snarkiness, given that i responded to a very specific claim:

      >No website offers that kind of ease of use for _adding_ information

      Obviously Wikipedia isn't great to upload your social security number to, but it does allow democratic adding of information which I cited it as an example of.

      Please read the HN guidelines. You seem to require a refresher:

      https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

      >Don't be snarky.

      • IanCal 3 days ago

        Perhaps it was a little snarky - it was intended with good humour to point out how drastically far away the suggestion was.

        Wikipedia is nothing like what this is for adding information in the way the comment says. Particularly because one of the very key points about this sheet is that you can copy it and add information. It's explicitly for that and Wikipedia absolutely does not offer the ease of use of filling in forms and adding your information on the go.

  • dewey 3 days ago

    Most wikis are not very user friendly (UI, not about the rules and moderation), most people have used Word / Google Docs before so it's much more natural.

teddyh 3 days ago

Have you heard of Wikis?

  • egberts1 3 days ago

    Have you tried to edit just a tiny section of a Wiki while being updated by thousands of Wiki editors?