Comment by smileybarry

Comment by smileybarry 2 days ago

10 replies

It's gotten dramatically worse since premium started rewarding payouts for engagement/views, alongside zero moderation. Now there's an actual incentive to be a jerk, a spammer, and make repeated bad faith arguments / "just asking questions" -- people reply, your tweet is seen by more people, you get paid a share of ad revenue.

Then you have the regurgitated messages in replies (AI or otherwise) endlessly copied and distorted. Recently it's been 5+ pages until I see a real reply, while I have 3000+ accounts blocked by now. It's getting harder and harder to find the real person who wrote that witty reply, and not the endless blue check accounts who copy-pasted it to farm engagement on their visibility-boosted tweets.

Genuinely getting more and more unusable.

numpad0 2 days ago

Tangential but there's my disappointment to AI in there: they haven't found a way to build convincingly human bots, let alone a procedural content creation system.

Both AI believers and doomers insist generative AI could surpass humans by every single metric that matters in social media. All we've got is first Nigerian, then Indian, and now increasingly Pakistani spammers desperately reply bombing trending posts made by 10 years alpha users, as if whoever behind it completely failed to do it and has been wasting gullible human spammer candidates faster than Aperture Science.

  • rchaud 2 days ago

    > they haven't found a way to build convincingly human bots, let alone a procedural content creation system.

    The 'they' being the corporations that hired thousands of people from the very countries you're associating with spammers , to review, correct and train AI models?

wcarss 2 days ago

Why not, um... stop using it?

Mastodon has a lot of great people, and a lot less of all this stuff.

  • CaptainFever 2 days ago

    Not parent, but I did use Mastodon for about a year. I ended up moving back to Twitter because:

    1. I just couldn't vibe with the culture there. From my POV, Mastodon is made out of pearl-clutchers and politics.

    2. So much drama. The FediSearch drama. The Raspberry Pi incident. It's just so tiring and you feel like you need to walk on eggshells all the time.

    3. So much drama. You would just pray that your admin didn't get into a spat with another admin and get defederated. You could get a solo server, but that costs money and you might get blocked by a large server's admin anyway.

    4. So much drama. Pray that your server doesn't shut down, because you can't import your posts elsewhere. Solo, yes, but costs money.

    At least with Twitter, the rules are sort of well known, and you can follow anyone there unless they block you personally.

    I heard BlueSky is good, though. Haven't tried it yet. Nostr was also another one, to get around the admin drama issue, but it doesn't seem very popular.

    • shiroiushi 2 days ago

      >4. So much drama. Pray that your server doesn't shut down, because you can't import your posts elsewhere.

      I would have thought a well-designed decentralized system would allow you to, for instance, download/export all your posts, and then import them all to a new server, in case you have to move servers for some reason.

      • Nextgrid a day ago

        The server-oriented aspect of Mastodon was the second-worst decision ever (the first one was the name). Mainstream social media doesn't ask you to pick a server (nor deal with the consequences of it going down), its replacement shouldn't either.

  • smileybarry 2 days ago

    I have a Mastodon account, a Bluesky account, and apps for both. Mastodon doesn’t replace the comedy part of Twitter, and Bluesky is great but 99% of local social media is still on Twitter. So I’m “trapped” on Twitter until they move to Bluesky, but they won’t because a part of that crowd is addicted to the revenue share off their political tweets.