belorn 3 days ago

I wonder if it would endanger the plane. A 20g explosive sitting in the pocket of a person will clearly cause serious injury, but I am unsure if it has penetration power to actually go through the plane body. I am reminded of mythbusters experiments with small amount of explosives to block up doors, but I don't recall how much they needed in the end.

  • WalterBright 2 days ago

    Poking holes in the fuselage of a jetliner isn't going to take down a plane. Consider the cases of a turbine fan blade taking out a window, the case where the MAX door panel blew off, the cases where the cargo door came off, and the 737 "convertible" case. You'd have to take out a large part of the structure to bring it down.

    Take a look at all the photos of B-17s taking severe combat damage yet returning home. Jetliners are a lot more redundant today than the B-17s were.

    However, if the hole took out the flight controls, or set a fire, then the airplane has a big problem.

    • komali2 2 days ago

      In some of the cases you mentioned, there were passenger deaths due to being ejected from the aircraft. I'm on mobile or I'd link exactly which incidents but I remember at least two cases from when I was bored in a lecture and read through most of Wikipedia's "list of deaths in aircraft incidents" list or whatever it's called

      • WalterBright 2 days ago

        Yes, there are passenger deaths from some of those incidents. But the plane wasn't brought down.

    • shiroiushi 2 days ago

      >Poking holes in the fuselage of a jetliner isn't going to take down a plane. Consider the cases of

      These are all fake news. According to Hollywood, a single bullet from a gun will cause an airplane to break apart in mid-air. You can't honestly expect me to believe Hollywood movies get physics wrong.

      Similarly, as soon as a car's wheels leave the ground, it bursts into a fireball according to many TV shows I've seen.

      /s

  • Sindisil 2 days ago

    What about the person sitting next to the target?

    • belorn 2 days ago

      Naturally the close quarters will results in multiple people being harmed. The question is more about the physics and if the explosives has enough penetrating power to go through the walls of the plane.

      The bigger risk to the plane (and passengers) would likely be if the person carrying the explosive was working in the airport and the explosion occurred during a critical moment, like when a pilot is taxiing.

mattmaroon 3 days ago

Most of the flight would be out of range and I’m not even sure that explosion would take out a plane. Plus it would probably be powered off because Hezbollah is serious about flight safety.

  • hypeatei 2 days ago

    > I’m not even sure that explosion would take out a plane

    I take it you would have no problem being on a plane with one (or even multiple) of these pagers going off then? What kind of argument is this?

    • mattmaroon 2 days ago

      I wouldn’t want to be near it anywhere so what’s the difference between a plane and a grocery store?

      The comment implied Israel was risking blowing up an entire plane when we were discussing whether it was targeted or not.

      Go play in the other room, the grownups are talking.

knight_47 2 days ago

I was thinking about this, but then it probably wouldn't even get past a security xray scan. Which makes me think, in the 5 or so months these were reported to being in the wild, one never boarded a plane?

  • agapon 2 days ago

    Hamas terrorists boarding commercial airplanes? With their secret pagers on them?

    Somehow I don't think so.

jarsin 3 days ago

Do we know whether or not they embedded gps tracking into the bombs?

I would think they would have that ability, not just to avoid a horrible accident like blowing up a plane, but also to gather valuable tracking intel on a terrorist organization.

  • satori99 3 days ago

    My understanding is that pagers are typically radio Rx-only, and that it is not possible to track their location like a cellular device -- which is likely why Hezbollah chose to use them.

    Though it would be possible to add this ability when the hardware was intercepted, a transmitting device is also easy to detect.

    • jasonwatkinspdx 2 days ago

      Two way pagers have been a thing since the 90s. You're limited to replying with a very short alphanumeric message.

      That said, pagers don't continuously ping the tower like cell phones do. They can stay receive only until the moment you chose to send a message.

      • BuildTheRobots 14 hours ago

        The AR924's in question are POCSAG pagers; broadcast from base stations and receive only at the pager end. Two way pagers are a thing but use an entirely different protocol for communications.

alphan0n 2 days ago

A pager wouldn’t have been able to connect to any networks at altitude.

  • Terr_ 2 days ago

    From what I can find, the targeted pager-model can receive UHF messages in the 450~470MHz range. That could reach passenger jet cruise altitudes if the transmitter is strong enough.

    I think it's safest to assume Hezbollah are using strong transmitters, because they'll want to be able to broadcast across rather large areas and in a way that resists potential jamming.

    On the flip side, I'm having a hard time imagining these as threats to an entire airplane, given the tight constraints on how much explosive power can be secretly snuck into a functioning pager.

    • alphan0n a day ago

      Penetration of 450-480MHz through the shell of an airplane would, on the ground,require a transmission strength of approximately .4dB/m at a distance of 1 kilometer, which is doable by most measures, but would quickly become unrealistic as the plane gained altitude.

      https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/68269081/560768.pdf

  • blantonl 2 days ago

    Pagers don’t “connect” to networks.

    • alphan0n 2 days ago

      What do they do, then? Are you implying that connections can only exist as a two way relationship? Are rivers not connected to streams, tributaries, etc?

      Receiving data from a network is a connection, no matter how you want to define it.

      • blantonl a day ago

        Yes, I am definitely implying that a connection only exists in a two way relationship. Don't be obtuse.

        • alphan0n a day ago

          Don’t be vague then. What do pagers do, if not connect?

    • Taniwha 2 days ago

      The towers resend the message for a while so that they get through - some guy might be in a plane on approach to Beirut right now his pager coming into range as they land ....