Comment by AustinDev

Comment by AustinDev 3 days ago

17 replies

The death toll isn't the goal. They're after the 2nd order effects, now there are ~3,000 operatives that are marked by a scar that is relatively distinctive. They also have substantially disrupted their communication protocols and caused psychological damage.

Agingcoder 3 days ago

Hezbollah members in Lebanon are not necessarily perceived as bad people - why would the scar be a problem ? Hezbollah claims it’s a resistance movement to Israel, they’re now wearing a scar caused by Israel in a mass coordinated attack, which will further legitimize Hezbollah.

I agree with the disruption of communication protocols and psychological damage though.

  • underdeserver 3 days ago

    I don't get it. Why does Lebanon need to resist Israel? When in recent history has Israel attacked Lebanon or threatened it in any way, except in retaliation or defense against Hezbollah acts?

    • mongol 3 days ago

      In the first Lebanon war, Israel invaded Lebanon to strike against PLO. At this time, Hezbollah did not really exist, or was at least small and insignificant. It grew as a force in opposition of Israel's occupation.

      • underdeserver 2 days ago

        If the ruling government of Lebanon allowed the PLO to strike Israel from Lebanese soil, what could they expect Israel to do?

    • Sawamara 2 days ago

      Please read some history man. I urge you to do it. Google it.

      • underdeserver 2 days ago

        I actually read quite a bit. Point me towards something specific if you will.

  • orochimaaru 3 days ago

    Is it all of Lebanon though? I think Christian and Druze Lebanese don’t like the Hezbollah much anyway. Sure the Shiite south does but no one else.

  • ars 3 days ago

    The scar marks an operative. Israel has a huge amount of video footage, now they work backward and see where that person went, and who they talked to.

aksss 3 days ago

This is on target. Tagging collaborators certainly has advantages, not so much for invoking a social glare at home but helping to identify them to intelligence sources, certainly.