Comment by mykowebhn

Comment by mykowebhn 10 months ago

22 replies

Yours is a heartfelt, sincere take on a successful 21st century career in tech, but I feel it is so one-sided.

Yes, you seem to have benefitted greatly, but your examples of efficiency and availability are flawed. For example:

"apps on phones that can know my tastes and preferences": I don't see any benefits. When Youtube recommends for the billionth time a stupid soccer short because I previously watched one soccer short, I want to scream. Also, privacy or lack thereof.

"hailing a cab virtually": made possible due to full-time workers who have none of the benefits of full-time workers, in other words, exploitation.

"a bonkers level of selection of goods to all consumers": One word that encapsulates the other side of your "bonkers level of selection"--Temu.

"low friction same-day delivery": Made possible due to our reliance on fossil fuels

"far greater access to online services including education and financing": I'm not sure about the financing part. Education? Yeah, if I want to learn about something like video-editing. But I could've bought a book on that in the past and probably learned it much more in depth. If I wanted to learn something like German Idealism, not so much.

I think your pocket book has benefitted immensely, but all of the other benefits don't seem like benefits to me on a macro level. But kudos to you for doing so well and believing the world partakes in your good fortune.

roenxi 10 months ago

There seems to be an argument here against markets, energy use and entertainment. While criticism is legitimate, little there is related to tech specificially and it is more a complaint against the construction of modern society from the 1700s onwards.

borski 10 months ago

That’s a pretty cynical view. In essence, what you’re saying is “all the things you care about are not things I care about and/or actually despise.”

And that’s OK - you don’t have to work at Amazon! But the implication is that the OP has the “wool over their eyes,” so to speak, and I think that’s unfair. They’re allowed to love their job and find it impactful, even if you don’t. :)

It’s possible I misread this somehow, so if that’s the case, apologies in advance.

  • azemetre 10 months ago

    It's not cynical to point out external costs, the alternative is to take corporate propaganda at face value without ever questioning if things are right or not.

  • j_maffe 10 months ago

    GP isn't arguing for subjective preference but objective value. People are of course allowed to find their work impactful. Doesn't mean it actually is.

hluska 10 months ago

What do you do that is so pure it doesn't have externalities?

  • arcticbull 10 months ago

    Let they who work on a product without externalities cast the first stone

    • yamazakiwi 10 months ago

      The opposite, as it is a privilege to work somewhere without externalities.

      • Ferret7446 10 months ago

        The privilege of ignorance? Because no such thing exists, unless of course you are ignorant of the externalities which is very likely.

        As they say, ignorance is bliss.

  • cwalv 10 months ago

    Academia or journalism. Or maybe a lobbyist

  • fwip 10 months ago

    Degree matters. Working at a missile factory is worse than working for Amazon is worse than working for a public library.

    • cm2012 10 months ago

      Working at a missile factory could be one of the best/most important things you do with your life. Anti-air interceptor missiles save innocent lives every week in Ukraine, for instance.

    • notinmykernel 10 months ago

      Well, if you are R&D, you may be working on a ~~missile~~ drone project for Amazon. So, one and the same.

    • fwip 10 months ago

      Whoops. Should have remembered not to offend the pro-war crowd here on HN.

    • CamperBob2 10 months ago

      Ask your friendly neighborhood Ukrainian refugees if they agree with that.

      • underlipton 10 months ago

        You want me on that wall, you need me on that wall, etc.

        Nicholson was still the bad guy.

    • Nimitz14 10 months ago

      You are stating as fact what is in fact your (naive) opinion.

      • fwip 10 months ago

        The fact is that the degree of harm matters. My opinion is that weapons of mass murder have made the world worse.